Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
 Offline
Posts: 19
|
 |
« on: March 14, 2018, 01:01:46 PM »
|
|
|
Hi there, I would to run my BAM with 064 in MAFless setup but according to this topic, such settings don't work properly. http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=12708.0With CLALM set 1 I have blinking checkengine. With CLALM set 0 no check but also no TCS. Everything else done like in tutorial above. What I do wrong? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
teobolo
Full Member
Karma: +24/-6
Offline
Posts: 112
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2018, 01:55:06 PM »
|
|
|
This solution is not working to all Me7.5
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2018, 02:13:21 PM »
|
|
|
So anyone could help me with my map? Or give the adresses and proper sets to have working TCS in such soft?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 14, 2018, 02:31:27 PM by Fawor »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2018, 02:29:35 PM »
|
|
|
del
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nubcake
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2018, 04:14:33 PM »
|
|
|
What I do wrong? Run alpha-N emergency load calculation in place of a main one. If you want proper ECU functioning - pay someone to do a speed-density patch for you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jjuuaannk
Full Member
Karma: +1/-1
Offline
Posts: 89
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2018, 07:36:17 PM »
|
|
|
So anyone could help me with my map? Or give the adresses and proper sets to have working TCS in such soft?
Hello, I was reviewing your file and found it interesting What configuration do you use other than k04-064? injectors? How does your cupraR move with that configuration? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Leon Cupra R 1M
|
|
|
|
adam-
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2018, 12:44:35 AM »
|
|
|
Why? Run an inlet like on the TFSI and use a MAF. The 064 inlet is on top, literally a 90* bend and put a MAF on it. Loads of space.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2018, 01:12:49 AM »
|
|
|
Run alpha-N emergency load calculation in place of a main one.
If you want proper ECU functioning - pay someone to do a speed-density patch for you.
I would to do this alone - this is why I'm asking here  Any tutorials how to do it right? Adam-: Space is not a problem here. Probably with my bad luck - second MAF has screwed up. First one has readed 260gram, second for a while was good (210-220gram) but went to 185....with every bad results different then 21x gram I feel that car is more lazy and doesn't pull so strong (dynoed 337PS/405Nm with proper MAF). I want to tune it without MAF interference to have one stable setup without thinking "interesting does my MAF is now ok or not"  jjuuaannk - car with goodworking MAF is for me an ultimate streetcar Runs really well and 'wakes up' earlier then with 023. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2018, 02:28:45 AM by Fawor »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
adam-
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2018, 01:14:42 AM »
|
|
|
Vibration? I've got an 064 and only killed 1 in three years because it fell off. No issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2018, 04:23:10 AM »
|
|
|
Any ideas...this one which was showing 260gram was from my old 023 setup and probably already in 023 wasn't working perfectly. Second one from Bosch-exchange was living 2 weeks..maybe an incident. But I would like to not have any such incidents more  All welding and install solutions are made analog few other setups from this tuner so I don't think so that this is a case why MAFs are dead. So: anyone could help me? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nubcake
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2018, 04:32:39 AM »
|
|
|
Speed-density conversion is quite involved and requires assembly patches to the ECU code.
If any of those words sounds unfamiliar to you - you won't be able to do it yourself, unfortunately.
A healthy alternative is fitting another proper MAF (not a Chinese knock-off, but a new original) and properly calibrating it.
Again, just making the ecu run Alpha-N will accomplish nothing, unless it's a "WOT-only" dragster. Part-throttle load calculation will be very wonky.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2018, 07:00:49 PM »
|
|
|
I want to tune it without MAF interference to have one stable setup without thinking "interesting does my MAF is now ok or not"
I have no idea why you think alpha-n is better than making sure you have a working MAF. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mister t
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2018, 07:43:05 PM »
|
|
|
I have no idea why you think alpha-n is better than making sure you have a working MAF.
Agreed, from what I know, the only reason to be running a speed density setup is if you have a massive HP car (i.e. over 600 HP). Why have you eliminated the MAF? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2018, 09:34:07 PM »
|
|
|
Agreed, from what I know, the only reason to be running a speed density setup is if you have a massive HP car (i.e. over 600 HP).
Why have you eliminated the MAF?
I don't really have a problem with speed density, but that is impossible to do on ME7 without a ton of work. Problem is, noobs seem to consistently confuse alpha-n with speed density :/ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2018, 12:58:23 PM »
|
|
|
It's not a ton of work once you've written the code and tested it. Well yes, it's a ton of work until then.
You need to modify main load calc, and also you need stuff like a digital filter on the MAP signal to prevent your load becoming a sawtooth and ESUK going bonkers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
