julex
|
|
« Reply #270 on: March 09, 2012, 07:06:13 AM »
|
|
|
Bit 0 of CWLAMFAW does not enable or disable this function. It only changes how dzwwl and wkrma are evaluated.
Let's not be anal about it. The net effect is that it is effectively disabled due to the way it is calculated with bit set to 1
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Snow Trooper
|
|
« Reply #271 on: March 09, 2012, 06:46:14 PM »
|
|
|
So, are we tuning the kr map or not? Julex have you tried a stock kr table and seen what your krl changes do?
|
|
|
Logged
|
cartoons? 6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #272 on: March 09, 2012, 09:09:08 PM »
|
|
|
Let's not be anal about it. The net effect is that it is effectively disabled due to the way it is calculated with bit set to 1 Just trying to make the point that you can see enrichment regardless if CWLAMFAW bit zero is set or not. It just will not be very predictable. So, are we tuning the kr map or not? Julex have you tried a stock kr table and seen what your krl changes do?
KFLAMKR needs to be modified. In stock form KFLAMKRL is useless.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #273 on: March 10, 2012, 11:24:20 AM »
|
|
|
too much information on this thread! everyone is confused... lol!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Snow Trooper
|
|
« Reply #274 on: March 10, 2012, 01:03:38 PM »
|
|
|
KFLAMKR needs to be modified. In stock form KFLAMKRL is useless.
OMG... I know in stock form the RL map is useless. There has been mixed info in KR this whole time. People keep exhanging them as one in the same.
|
|
|
Logged
|
cartoons? 6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #275 on: March 10, 2012, 02:11:10 PM »
|
|
|
OMG... I know in stock form the RL map is useless. There has been mixed info in KR this whole time. People keep exhanging them as one in the same.
I was trying to say KFLAMKRL is useless with stock KFLAMKR. lamfawkr_w = 1-(1 - (KFLAMKRL + DLAMTANS) * KFLAMKR)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #276 on: March 10, 2012, 02:32:58 PM »
|
|
|
CWLAMFAW = 0 dzlamfaw = min(0, min(0, dzwwl) + wkrma) This is the x axis for KFLAMKRL dzwwl = KFZWWLRL + (KFZWWLNM * FZWWLRLN) KFZWWLRL - nmot, tmot (coolant temp) FZWWLRLN - rl, nmot KFZWWLNM - nmot, tans (iat)
|
|
« Last Edit: March 10, 2012, 02:37:17 PM by phila_dot »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #277 on: March 10, 2012, 02:46:20 PM »
|
|
|
I was trying to say KFLAMKRL is useless with stock KFLAMKR. lamfawkr_w = 1-(1 - (KFLAMKRL + DLAMTANS) * KFLAMKR) ok almost there. now we need to take julex's advised set of tables and create a similar picture. lemme see if the info is here yet...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #278 on: March 10, 2012, 02:54:12 PM »
|
|
|
please verify julex.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #279 on: March 10, 2012, 05:00:55 PM »
|
|
|
KFLAMKR table screenshot forgot to mention the following conversions: row: 3*x/4 column: 40*x
map-pack will be updated soon.
phila_dot can you please include table definition information for DLAMTANS? julex, is your DLAMTANS all 0? if not please upload the screenshot.
very close to cleaned up here...
|
|
« Last Edit: March 10, 2012, 05:10:59 PM by nehalem »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Snow Trooper
|
|
« Reply #280 on: March 10, 2012, 06:01:54 PM »
|
|
|
row is .75 * X conversion on kflamkr
|
|
|
Logged
|
cartoons? 6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
|
|
|
Snow Trooper
|
|
« Reply #281 on: March 10, 2012, 06:08:04 PM »
|
|
|
I was trying to say KFLAMKRL is useless with stock KFLAMKR. lamfawkr_w = 1-(1 - (KFLAMKRL + DLAMTANS) * KFLAMKR) ok thank you, I finally correctly defined it and it makes sense to me now. you must mod both to get knock based dynamic fueling. I had to find tonys conversions
|
|
|
Logged
|
cartoons? 6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #282 on: March 10, 2012, 10:50:16 PM »
|
|
|
phila_dot can you please include table definition information for DLAMTANS?
DLAMTANS (Air temperature-dependent enrichment) - 0x1C36B signed conversion X*0.007813 x (tans) - 0x1C367 4 columns conversion X*.75-48
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
julex
|
|
« Reply #283 on: March 11, 2012, 09:41:50 AM »
|
|
|
dlamtans stays stock 0 all across.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #284 on: March 11, 2012, 11:39:15 AM »
|
|
|
dlamtans stays stock 0 all across.
Unless you want to offset lambda for IAT...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|