Quick question as I read through this 20 times already.    On the kflamKR table does it matter which axis has rpm?  Mine is backwards as compared to all the screenshots I have seen.  I have rpm on the y instead of x.  I have input the values in there coresponding cells of x and y location.  Just wondering if the axis being reversed matters.

Hi

I try to use KFLAMKR and KFLMAKRL based fueling on my 4B0906018CG ecu but during road test i am guite sure that those maps are located wrong on .ols which i am using.

Can somebody please check data and axis locations for those values?

hi
I dont understand problem with LAMFA axis , I had read this topic and Wiki 1.8 T tuning :/
ori file in attache
x axis is 1D8E6 factor 0.003052 16 bit LoHi 
and I have got on axis  85.01 87.51 90.01 92.51 95.01 97.51
but in Wiki is written :
" the stock LAMFA load axis is (incorrectly) restricted to 0.5%-1.0%"

fixed, hopefully.

I'm trying to understand how does BTS work, but a little confused by 26 pages of the thread 

lambts = KFLBTS + ([KF]DLBTS * KFFDLBTS)

For example LAMKR is disabled, LAMFA = 1, retardation is 0 CF
I attached BTS maps.

So here are my calculations (rl = 138 on 6000 RPM)?

lambts = 0.9219 + (0 * 0.8672) =  0.9219

for retardation 12 CF:
lambts = 0.9219 + (-0.2813 * 0.8672) = 0.9219 + (-0.2439) = 0.6779

Am I right or totally wrong? I think I'm wrong because it doesnt work for 190 load. Please throw me a bone.

This, it's ignition angle efficiency.

You can have no timing retard and poor ignition angle efficiency.

Yep. Sounds about right to me.