|
nyet
|
 |
« Reply #450 on: February 17, 2016, 02:52:14 PM »
|
|
|
dzwlamfaw, rl -> KFLAMKRL
nmot, rl -> KFLAMKR
 There's your answer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
Jim_Coupe
|
|
« Reply #451 on: February 18, 2016, 01:52:37 AM »
|
|
|
 Thanks for guidance.. I guess i need to re-read whole thread once more and try it on my experiment car..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
E85oholic
|
|
|
|
Jim_Coupe
|
|
« Reply #452 on: February 23, 2016, 11:56:18 AM »
|
|
|
I think i understand how it works. "Think".. I post this just to see how much i have understood.
1. I looked into CWLAMFAW and its: 00110000. First bit = 0 (Default from factory)
2. I changed tha axis data.
3. Enterd some values into KFLAMKRL..
4. Edited KFLAMKR with "0" and left the rest "1.00".
now.. as in can understand the lowes lambda will be the boss.. KFLAMKRL will now act as a Load based 6x6 map above 40% load.
Can someone comfirm this..
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 23, 2016, 12:02:27 PM by Jim_Coupe »
|
Logged
|
E85oholic
|
|
|
|
armageddon
|
|
« Reply #453 on: February 23, 2016, 02:42:17 PM »
|
|
|
you should edit your lamfa axis something like 50 60 70 80 90 95
you only want krl enrichment starting at 9.75 ignition retard?
also, KFLAMKRL and KFLAMKR shares the same load axis.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jim_Coupe
|
|
« Reply #454 on: February 23, 2016, 03:11:32 PM »
|
|
|
you should edit your lamfa axis something like 50 60 70 80 90 95
you only want krl enrichment starting at 9.75 ignition retard?
also, KFLAMKRL and KFLAMKR shares the same load axis.
Thanks bro! i noticed ive forgot to change that axis.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
E85oholic
|
|
|
|
golfputtputt
|
|
« Reply #455 on: March 05, 2016, 10:02:10 AM »
|
|
|
Why did he set his CW to 48?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DT
Full Member
Karma: +20/-1
 Offline
Posts: 184
|
|
« Reply #456 on: March 05, 2016, 12:21:22 PM »
|
|
|
I could really do without these last 2+ pages or atleast have them transferred to n00b forum, they are OT and not even interessting since you will not see E85 knock until it's too late. Why do you think that e85 ignition tuning is done by looking at torque instead of knock.
Jim as said many times, you need to read more before asking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jim_Coupe
|
|
« Reply #457 on: March 09, 2016, 01:41:17 AM »
|
|
|
Why did he set his CW to 48?
Take a calculator and switch over to "programmer" > select "Dec" > type 48 > select Bin.. There you have it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
E85oholic
|
|
|
|
Jim_Coupe
|
|
« Reply #458 on: March 09, 2016, 01:43:14 AM »
|
|
|
I could really do without these last 2+ pages or atleast have them transferred to n00b forum, they are OT and not even interessting since you will not see E85 knock until it's too late. Why do you think that e85 ignition tuning is done by looking at torque instead of knock.
Jim as said many times, you need to read more before asking.
Ok with me.. "Moderator! fire at will".. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
E85oholic
|
|
|
|
dream3R
|
|
« Reply #459 on: April 13, 2016, 05:32:15 PM »
|
|
|
Wideband it's useful.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #460 on: September 26, 2016, 02:03:47 PM »
|
|
|
Don't know if anyone already suggested it but there is one more alternative to already known fueling methods.
More info @ lamfaw-lamwl. I am currently succesfully using this method.
Basically set KFLAFWL to whatever enrichment offset (from 1) you want.
For example if lambda 1.0 -> 14.7 AFR then KFLAFWL @ some cell with value -0.1 would mean final lambda value of 0.9. Easy, right? Only catch is you have to ensure all the other LAMFAW variables (lamfaws_w, lamfawkr_w, lamrlmn_w) are set to 1.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jim_Coupe
|
|
« Reply #461 on: September 28, 2016, 04:12:57 PM »
|
|
|
Interesting. You have tested it and it works?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
E85oholic
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #462 on: October 03, 2016, 03:33:31 AM »
|
|
|
Interesting. You have tested it and it works?
Yes. That is what I am using right now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #463 on: October 07, 2016, 11:04:12 AM »
|
|
|
Don't know if anyone already suggested it but there is one more alternative to already known fueling methods.
More info @ lamfaw-lamwl. I am currently succesfully using this method.
Basically set KFLAFWL to whatever enrichment offset (from 1) you want.
For example if lambda 1.0 -> 14.7 AFR then KFLAFWL @ some cell with value -0.1 would mean final lambda value of 0.9. Easy, right? Only catch is you have to ensure all the other LAMFAW variables (lamfaws_w, lamfawkr_w, lamrlmn_w) are set to 1.
Please just stop. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
