Ridiculous statement at every level.

I constantly see "professional" tunes worse than this ....what I cannot understand with flat KFLDHBN ...is it really so hard to calculate and have a normal limiter...also lambda's are really bad

Hello jurebv and Bitshifter !

Thank you for your inputs !
Of course you are right I wanted to say roughly 300 hp with stage 1 ! My bad, 320 will be when later I intend to remove the cat and go for a stage 2.
Also, you are both absolutely right, I have still to work on lambda.. but I need a little help on that topic  

But first concerning KFLDHBN, I was having same thought : "flat modifying seems not to be a good way to tune" just deactivating limitation, so any advice on how I should adjust the values ?
Should I try to transfer a K04 flow map into KFLDHBN?

Concerning lambda;I have read the basano thread many times, great thread ! And I will continue to do so to see what I miss.
But on lambda I still didn't find any simple explanation or good example of modded maps... can you maybe give me an advice or point towards what I did wrong and didn't understand ?

What I understand so far is that lambts is triggered very easily when EGT is calculated too high (which happens even with the original software) so I am not sure what I should do... it seems at WOT lamfa is never used making it useless to modify without altering the "mechanism" of lamfa/lambts too.

So should I raise the threshold for BTS?
Take the single value threshold of EGT,(I think it is called TAIKRBTS) which is at 800° and make it higher like 850 ? Also I saw the lamfa delay which it seems is making lamfa not used while this time.
=> So a good tune involves making this EGT single upper and zeroing the time delay? Or is it still completely wrong and stupid?

Then are my values OK for lamfa and lambts if I raise the threshold for BTS switching ? Or is it too lean , or too rich or or or ??  
(For now I have values roughly like : Lamfa 0,9-0,85 and lambts 0,91-0,84 on high loads)


Thank you guys for your help

Don`t run to lean! If you don`t know real EGT, stay safe. Edit Maps @ high load and high rpm and give them 0.8! Later you can touch them, if necessary.

It is just an example:

That is the wrong way to tune your car, start from scratch!

Read your topic angain...the direction was wrote here

Concentrate your energy to understand basics. ME7 is similär MED9!

Here is your way!


https://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning

All right? 

Also learn how it calculates fuel.  Look at that table - it does not target 1.25.

I am still willing to know how to properly tune my fueling, but in the meantime as it seems no fueling modification is necessary for a stage 1 tune, I will simply put lamfa back to stock, and kflbts too (or almost stock, maybe a little leaner at high rpm/load).

Concerning boost, I got help from someone who suggested that my KFMIRL might be making the load drop ! And I will dig into that on my next tune, since it is true that on KFMIRL the load is dropping with rpm. So I will try to up the load output from KFMIRL at high rpm to see if it requests more load/boost.

If not sufficient should I look into KFLDRL and KFPLGUB ?

As a reminder my target is to request more boost at high rpm to follow more closely the load from LDRXN, because for now the requested boost is dropping, and so actual boost is dropping too of course, and eventually actual load dropping since boost is low.