Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Help for nls lc me7.9.10  (Read 11678 times)
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« on: December 26, 2018, 09:26:52 AM »

hello everyone. can anyone help me with l
activation of the lls nls on this file? I made the changes by helping with ida and the files posted by woj.ma after several tests I can not even start the car.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2018, 12:36:27 PM by mauriGTI » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2018, 12:16:57 PM »

Split and moved.

Please don't shit in other peoples threads
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2018, 12:33:38 PM »


sorry bon I wanted to disturb the post .. I asked for help here since there was also talk of nls and lc ... this was suggested to me by another user. Then I did not want anything for free. Just some advice or advice ..
Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2018, 12:38:21 PM »

Sorry but my english...
Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2018, 07:00:35 AM »

no one who can help me? or at least some advice?
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2800



« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2018, 07:19:30 AM »

no one who can help me? or at least some advice?
the code on this forum is only for vag me7 cars not any me7. i think the reason none replied is because if you didnt put forth any effort to see that this site is 98% vag and youre asking someone to do the patching for you. free handouts are not really tolerated, i guess its kinda a unspoken forum rule. anyway good luck with your tuning and happy new year
Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
woj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2018, 10:50:45 AM »

the code on this forum is only for vag me7 cars not any me7. i think the reason none replied is because if you didnt put forth any effort to see that this site is 98% vag and youre asking someone to do the patching for you. free handouts are not really tolerated, i guess its kinda a unspoken forum rule. anyway good luck with your tuning and happy new year

You are not up to date mate Wink I did the code for 7.9.10, it is in the ME7.9.10 thread. With full source code, but I published address data for only one bin. Other bins are at the discretion of the willing and capable users or at a fee. Seems to be the fee that makes people to cry out for help.
Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2019, 07:09:02 AM »

You are not up to date mate Wink I did the code for 7.9.10, it is in the ME7.9.10 thread. With full source code, but I published address data for only one bin. Other bins are at the discretion of the willing and capable users or at a fee. Seems to be the fee that makes people to cry out for help.
it was not a question of free patches, it was simply a matter of wanting to do it myself and understanding my mistakes all that ...
 

Logged
woj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2019, 09:15:15 AM »

it was not a question of free patches, it was simply a matter of wanting to do it myself and understanding my mistakes all that ...

Well, let's see how to help you. I actually took the effort to download your files, I diffed them, I have the addresses for your bin (it is the same as my private one), and your patch is just different, not little different, totally different. Precisely how different - well, do not expect that anyone will reverse engineer what you did.

So, to get started, describe step by step exactly what you did, which patch you used as base, how you figured out the addresses and what they are according to you, how you patched your bin, which tools you used and how, and how did you try to check off-line that it is good (proper disassembly of your patched file to see that the patched code disassembles OK is a good start), other than trying to flash it and starting the car.

Then, maybe just maybe, it will be easier to spot what failed.

Another thing - it can be something as silly as unfixed checksums, code changes require a proper checksum procedure. Your posted modified file has one checksum missing, though it's the one that I personally believe does not matter, but you never know Wink
 
EDIT: OK, it's very different because I posted only the earlier simplified version of the code, not the one with bells and whistles. The required addresses for my bin which is code wise the same as yours, are also posted.

EDIT2: Now I made the comparison to the right version. Most variable addresses seem to be wrong, and also you got the little/big endian order wrong in your far calls / jumps. In one case it even results in a jump to an odd memory address, regardless of other things, this certainly locks the code. So, scroll back to above, tells what you have done and how, and we start from there.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2019, 10:13:39 AM by woj » Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2019, 11:32:03 AM »

Well, let's see how to help you. I actually took the effort to download your files, I diffed them, I have the addresses for your bin (it is the same as my private one), and your patch is just different, not little different, totally different. Precisely how different - well, do not expect that anyone will reverse engineer what you did.

So, to get started, describe step by step exactly what you did, which patch you used as base, how you figured out the addresses and what they are according to you, how you patched your bin, which tools you used and how, and how did you try to check off-line that it is good (proper disassembly of your patched file to see that the patched code disassembles OK is a good start), other than trying to flash it and starting the car.

Then, maybe just maybe, it will be easier to spot what failed.

Another thing - it can be something as silly as unfixed checksums, code changes require a proper checksum procedure. Your posted modified file has one checksum missing, though it's the one that I personally believe does not matter, but you never know Wink
 
EDIT: OK, it's very different because I posted only the earlier simplified version of the code, not the one with bells and whistles. The required addresses for my bin which is code wise the same as yours, are also posted.

EDIT2: Now I made the comparison to the right version. Most variable addresses seem to be wrong, and also you got the little/big endian order wrong in your far calls / jumps. In one case it even results in a jump to an odd memory address, regardless of other things, this certainly locks the code. So, scroll back to above, tells what you have done and how, and we start from there.

« Last Edit: January 02, 2019, 12:20:31 PM by mauriGTI » Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2019, 11:39:07 AM »



do not pay attention to my English, I'm using google translator.

I try to be clearer in describing my steps:

-I viewed your files well, patch, asm trying to interpret them as best I could.ov Obviously I do not have much experience with the dissambler .. even if it started to appasionarmi.

for my mod I used your patch as a base, even if I noticed the huge difference in the Rom area ...

using ida and taking a cue from your basket I found all the addresses described by your asm and I tried to adapt it to my sw with the appropriate changes (change many values) using a little logic I made all the substitutions ..

after which I corrected the cheksum with winols and the script in boot mode.

if you want I can post you my txt file that I created for the addresses ...

what was wrong ?? the addresses? the values I entered?

I know that I ask a lot but I want to try to understand ...
« Last Edit: January 02, 2019, 12:18:05 PM by mauriGTI » Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2019, 02:58:22 PM »

however disassembling your mod file and my mod I noticed a big difference already in the first address in sending to the routine ... the first function does not return me. making the same changes .. can you please kindly explain how to set up correctly?
Logged
gt-innovation
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +60/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 449


« Reply #12 on: January 04, 2019, 03:30:42 AM »

however disassembling your mod file and my mod I noticed a big difference already in the first address in sending to the routine ... the first function does not return me. making the same changes .. can you please kindly explain how to set up correctly?

It seems that you don`t pay attention to other people writing English too...He said that he can do that for you with a small fee...now if i was you and didn`t know what to do or what am i doing i would pay someone to do it for me and learn from that as well....
Logged
woj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


« Reply #13 on: January 04, 2019, 03:43:04 AM »

however disassembling your mod file and my mod I noticed a big difference already in the first address in sending to the routine ... the first function does not return me. making the same changes .. can you please kindly explain how to set up correctly?

Show us exactly what is going on, IDA screenshots, code listings, address values. "It does not work for me as it does for you" has no information in it Wink
Logged
mauriGTI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #14 on: January 04, 2019, 01:20:47 PM »

Show us exactly what is going on, IDA screenshots, code listings, address values. "It does not work for me as it does for you" has no information in it Wink
in sequence the first 2 images are your ori and your disassembled mod (dmd_loc)

the underlying are my gold and mod

already at the first address I do not return the function ...
(Dmd_loc)
« Last Edit: January 04, 2019, 01:28:02 PM by mauriGTI » Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.058 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)