Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Followup on CWMDAPP tuning -> turbo conversion - questions & other things.  (Read 8712 times)
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




Hello,

So  I have been messing up about with tuning my car after I successfully converted it to a t04e small frame from NA with the OG ecu - as you could read in the other thread - for about 2-3 weeks now.
So first of all CWMDAPP is set to 3 , which means pedal drives the Throttle plate angle using the map FPWDKAPP - right now throttle plate is about 3-7% higher than the pedal position - might change this later on cause of driveability issues for now @ idle its 3.13% AND timing is simple not torque based.

Trims - there are still no fuel trims , I'm unsure why, I didnt think cwmdapp would disable fuel trims but it seems like it does because before OG flash read it had trims. Some people suggested I should check out NORLA value but I am unable to do because it is not defined yet, and finding single bits is quite hard for me still even if I know the "Region" it resides in - some help would be appreciated Smiley

Fueling and Idle - So since I got no trims I am adjusting fuel based on lambda control in closed loop obviously.
 since cwmdapp there is no idle control so my idle RPM is around 1000-1300 flucutating cause of lambda control and rich condition , if I disable o2 regulation it doesnt. So today I changed FKKVS, after reading some more because originally in the FR it says the axis is tevfa_w , which you will see in logs ranges from 0-0.68 ms in my case, but the FKKVS map ms axis goes up till 12ms on this NA soft, so I though it must be the calculated injector on time. - adjusted FKKVS at the low ms injection time and the rpm I was seeing and you will see what happens Tongue vs the non adjusted map ( last link of the logs)

Limp - so originally I would get epc light at part throttle real fast cause of torque monitoring( because it is still active regardless of cwmdapp ) , so I have adjusted my requested load ( which caps out at 100% sadly it seems) and torque requests and KFPED ( and the load/rpm in KFMIRL) BUT not KFMIOP . This seems to have fixed most of these issue, but however today I had it again , as you will see one of the logs -  gonna have to adjust that still. Still have to match some areas in requested/actual load but for the most cause they are "aight" - I think  Cheesy

Any tips , help etc is much appreciated as long as its constructive Tongue Thank you if you read it all. There is still much to do.

Idle log after FKKVS adjustment - https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MQARslVrlNf1HSV8M-NibmzUqwdLHWwO

Some pulls log and limp mode(above) at 50 second markish ( I think) - https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GSoUY_mTfZ5ZWAtZupLGF3PWoo_OocHX

First start of the day ( without FKKVS adjustment ) and light driving until pull location - https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Uubz3doYqq-dSnyJIRw_aSQBmMNR16ke

« Last Edit: May 19, 2019, 09:32:05 AM by Blazius » Logged
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




Anything ? Also had to upload logs on Drive since for some reason it does not let me upload them as attachments  Huh
Logged
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




The Torque monitor limit 2 thing seems to happen at a very specifc pedal pos / torque request and actual load/requested load so I havent gotten it recently. However after 9 versions I am gonna branch off here.

The first one I'll leave it like this KFPED values mostly stock, torque requests and requested load is matched to actual load - however I am gonna try something different.

For the second one I am going to use the ME7 tuner wizard to generate a KFMIRL map , the corresponding IOP and disable torque monitor 2. And match the KFPED / torque requests to the requested load -> actual load if that makes sense - even though load caps out at 100% this way the torque request will correspond to the actaul load and I can adjust AFR with the LAMFA ( since again NA doesnt have bts fueling) , instead of adjusting the requests from Kfped so I can adjust afr from lamfa.

However I am still having issues with idle. It idles at quite high rpm so Ill try finding idle RPM map and change but I dont think it has any effect at all. I would want to lower RPM to about 1k max. Currently at 0% pedal pos the throttle plate angle is 3.13% , I could reduce this to lower the RPM BUT I am afraid it will give issues when the car is in neutral  or on gear shifts.
Not to mention on warmup lambda control is interfering so RPM is fluctuating since on warmup its enriched so its trying to correct it but it cant.

Also some minor issue is that sometimes the car is buckling when in gear deacceleration from 2000 to 1500 RPM.
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2795




RLVMXN

RLVSMXN
Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




RLVMXN

RLVSMXN


Hm I found KFMIZUOF yesterday , and setting it to 100% on all points should disable torque monitor 2 + the 2 temp scalars  from I've read on this forum and s4 wiki, should I also find these maps and change them ? Only torque monitor 2 is giving issues. Ill try finding them.

Btw how do you find single bits properly ? Even If I find them I am not sure if they are right, is there any way to confirm this, changing them randomly is scary because ususally there are multiple single bits next to eachother.
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2795




1 change at a time upload your original file and I'll see what I can find. Removing load caps and mxn smxn should get you boosting without limp
Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




1 change at a time upload your original file and I'll see what I can find. Removing load caps and mxn smxn should get you boosting without limp

http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=15390

here is the original bin.

But thats the thing. There is no actual load cap on NA, my actual load correctly goes above 100% , fueling follows it and no limp in boost , limp only happens in a very certain pedal position, ( about 20-30% pedal post and about 2.5k rpm - I assume because of torque caps so Ill remove those). However something caps requested load at 100% - somebody said its hard capped at compile ,even though torque request can go above 100%( so I can use lamfa to fuel properly) but not requested load, if I could make it go above 100% I could match it to actual load , just so it looks nice on logs Cheesy.

Also for fuel trims I was looking for NORLA but its hard for me that find that cause its a single value thats why I asked Smiley
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2795




load caps are at 4D*** AND 4D***. Set both to matching same offset factor as irl  Wink
« Last Edit: May 23, 2019, 05:08:58 AM by Marty » Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




load caps are at 4D*** AND 4D***. Set both to matching same offset factor as irl  Wink
wow thanks!
heh I ve seen that you edited post. I checked out those adresses and they gave me 3.984 with kfmirl's factor? so I assume they are not right , unless I did something wrong.
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2795




should be right addresses need to look at em in 16bit low high
Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




should be right addresses need to look at em in 16bit low high

Nice, I changed them to 16bit low high and they are showing 99.987 which is true. Thank you so much.

So I am safe to set this to the actual load I am getting max like 143 ?
Logged
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




should be right addresses need to look at em in 16bit low high

No bueno, I changed them to 140 , yet my most current log still shows that requested load gets capped at 99.984.( Actual is fine like I said before)
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2795




No bueno, I changed them to 140 , yet my most current log still shows that requested load gets capped at 99.984.( Actual is fine like I said before)
I'll check again when I get back to my computer
Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




I'll check again when I get back to my computer

Sure.

Meanwhile here is the latest log: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-DjGYC9Is2xCKs-cenKYQn4I0iczJAfC

Ive adjusted KFPED/torque requests even more to match the load , gonna flash that tommorow.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2019, 11:09:23 AM by Blazius » Logged
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282




So today actually I forgot to flash the "fixed" file and got limp again at 2.5k rpm'ish Cheesy Its fine you just have to cylce the key. Hopefully I wont forget to flash it tommorow.

example:



So a couple of other things. My cluster reads that either I am "eating" gas way too fast or idk but the gauge is dropping very fast. I assume this could be related to KVB which I found ( hopefully right 1A00C - I would appreciate if someone could verify) , so I am going to try to change it to my actual injectors ~370cc. as the stock value is about 185 cm3/s , when I flash a file , the gauge actually goes up but after start and a bit of driving it drops so thats why I am guessing KVB has an effect.

I still cant properly find NOLRA value and its bugging me cause no fuel trims Sad anyway  I am thinking using FKKVS fixer to fix lambda control.

Also probably gonna turn torque based ignition back to get a bit more control that way over idle and lower 0% pedal position throttle plate angle to about 2.5 % from 3.13% because it seems like its too much.
Which is probably also related to KISRM. I was thinking and probably should change this because I have switched to the 1.8t intake obviously, which is probably smaller than the NA one with the changeover too - also on changeover the KISRM value changes according to the FR , so probably should also take a look at that.

What do you think ?
« Last Edit: May 24, 2019, 03:42:49 PM by Blazius » Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)