Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Author

Topic: Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque (Read 6154 times)

elRey

Hero Member

Karma: +32/-1
Offline

Offline

Posts: 565

	Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque « on: March 06, 2012, 04:35:57 PM »

Any tried skipping the whole requested torque model and use the PED = requested torque?

function MDFUE

Set bit 2 in CWRLAPPL = 1
then set factor FWPEDRLS to reach your desired torque

If PED max = 100 and desired max torque = 250, then FWPEDRLS = 250/100 = 2.5

Be warned, this by-passes max requested torque limits like LDRXN, KFLDHBN, etc

Thoughts?


	Logged

julex

Hero Member

Karma: +79/-4
Offline

Offline

Posts: 923

	Re: Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque « Reply #1 on: March 06, 2012, 04:52:19 PM »

Quote from: elRey on March 06, 2012, 04:35:57 PM

Then you use KFLDHBN which is the way I control my boost anyway. I like it, if it works. You tried yet or is this all theoretical?


	Logged

elRey

Hero Member

Karma: +32/-1
Offline

Offline

Posts: 565

	Re: Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque « Reply #2 on: March 06, 2012, 05:29:27 PM »

Quote from: julex on March 06, 2012, 04:52:19 PM

You tried yet or is this all theoretical?

theoretical


	Logged

nyet

Administrator
Hero Member

Karma: +608/-168
Offline

Offline

Posts: 12270

	Re: Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque « Reply #3 on: March 06, 2012, 06:01:34 PM »

i like it.

does this also theoretically bypass all of the torque monitoring too?


	Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex

matchew

Hero Member

Karma: +47/-22
Offline

Offline

Posts: 503

	Re: Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque « Reply #4 on: March 06, 2012, 08:40:39 PM »

Good luck with getting a good idle with this.


	Logged

phila_dot

Hero Member

Karma: +173/-11
Offline

Offline

Posts: 1709

	Re: Skip KFMIRL and request torque model all together -> direct PED = torque « Reply #5 on: March 08, 2012, 01:06:28 PM »

Quote from: julex on March 06, 2012, 04:52:19 PM

Then you use KFLDHBN which is the way I control my boost anyway.

This skips rlmax entirely. KFLDHBN is not considered.

Quote from: nyet on March 06, 2012, 06:01:34 PM

i like it.

does this also theoretically bypass all of the torque monitoring too?

It bypasses the torque path entirely in the calculation of desired load. I don't think this will disable torque monitoring or torque monitoring level two, but it basically disables all forms of load intervention. It looks like all other forms of intervention via the torque path will still apply.

I like inventive solutions, but I wouldn't use this.

Does anyone really have a problem with desired load?


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Navigation

Personal Tools

November 26, 2024, 08:42:09 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Navigation

Personal Tools

Search