Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Author Topic: fuelling map changes for a 4bar FPR BAM 1.8T with Bosch 550s  (Read 19092 times)
stuartdean
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 78



Hi,

I wonder if someone can point in to a thread to help with tuning for a 4bar FPR?

I have a TT with a AET VT262C (rated 370bhp), DW65V, Bosch 117s + the necessary Intake, and Exhaust upgrades.

I have been tuning with the default settings from this forum
KRKTE  --
0.06205

TEMIN  -- 
0.7493

TVUB   -- 
7.96           10        11.97   14.01   15.98
2.6990   1.5389   1.1201   0.7308   0.5227

I have been managing to stay ahead of the ignition retard - and been adjusting the lamfa and timing whilst upping PID to come in line with the desired boost.  I made some changes which for the first time I have found myself where there is clearly too much boost and the fuel injectors cannot keep up - for example I have desired 0.82 but it is struggling to reach this and is 0.88 - this has only started happening since increasing the boost onset (this is quite a move before I was reaching 200 g/s at 5K and 240g/s at 6K  - but these changes are getting 200g/s at about 4K and 240g/s at 5K - this is now causing ignition retard on each cylinder.  I have fitted a 4 bar FPR instead but I am trying to find out what settings I need to change to utilise the 4 bar FPR - or is the correct solution to upgrade to 630cc injectors?

I can see that KRKTE is supposed to be lowered slightly - alternatively, is there any other changes I can do fuelling wise on a 3bar FPR - the "ms on time" for the injectors were 14ms to 18ms during this issue with keeping up with the desired.

at the moment I am keeping my logs to under 5K RPM when testing changes.

Many thanks for any pointers.
Logged
stuartdean
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 78


« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2019, 12:54:41 PM »

so what I made change wise made it start horribly - until warming and struggle over 3K and also run pretty lean.

I think I will surrender and get the 630 @ 3bar injectors instead - switching back to the 3bar settings (although lowering the temin to 0.6ms to try and battle the clearly rich idling) 

doe other people actually map 4 bar FPRs as part of a re-mapping scheme or desperation to get a little extra out - as it seems to be a bit of a black art.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2019, 03:27:44 PM »

hardly a black art.

there really isn't anything special about 4 bar FPRs unless you're having fuel pump issues, especially if you have proper latency reference tables for whatever injectors you are using.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
BlackT
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1419



« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2019, 11:54:27 PM »

Some logs would be of help . If your IDC rise but AFR stay same then you pump can not deliver enought fuel
Logged
stuartdean
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 78


« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2019, 01:08:58 PM »

Hi,

Thanks for you replies,

The fuel pump is only a couple of months old and a genuine Dw65v - I hope it is not failing.

I think my issue is related to the PID alignment, I am going to return to a trusted bin which had very little ignition retard 1-4 and AFR Desired and AFR Current very close, but what I have seen when the Desired is not being met with the Current is the EffInjector is only for example 17.4ms at 4000RPM which is only about 58% injector duty cycle. (1/4000*60/1000 = 15ms * 2 = 30ms 100% IDC)  and then doesn't really get over 18ms up to 6K.

I am unsure about what the % of KRKTE is based on?   air mass percent?

for KRKTE from s4wiki it said to use 34.125 / injector size cc/min  (I originally put in 550 but I think these are actually 544 cc/min)  - but is the 34.125 specific to a S4 - as when I look at the VVVortex URL - it calculates it to a lower figure?

https://forums.vwvortex.com/showthread.php?5496661-Ongoing-DIY-Tuning-Bosch-ME7.5-for-1.8t

So I dont actually think I need to press on with the 4bar FPR until I am maxing out the 3bar FPR IDC's

tunerpro says that KRKTE is ms/%  and I had in 0.06205 in this and if I divide 17.4ms effinjector on time into 0.06205 it equals 280.42 so I dont understand is this related to load somehow?  my load was about 200, if this is related to the map sensor - I have gone over the limit and I wonder if this is the issue and I really need to drop the boost or the 5120 hack?  I thought there was a form of open loop in boost where the system used the Desired AFR and MAF to calculate the fuelling?

is the sensible thing at this stage simply get a 4bar MAP sensor and apply the 5120hack? 

I have seen someone elses 1.8T K04(stock - with stock injectors) log where they have 25ms effectiveinjector ontime on at 4K RPM so to achieve this the tuner had managed to handle over 18ms effectiveinjectorontime and would have been 25(ms) / 0.08347 (KRKTE) which is 300%, the load in the log was about 210 and the actual boost and desired boost were also at the map sensor limit. 

So I am wondering if there is a "max effective injector on time" somewhere set as 18ms?  I have put this into my ME7Logger config so will do a short run tomorrow with the reduced PID - aligned more with desired.

I am sure all these queries sound a bit stupid, but I am still trying to learn this - every time, I can see how something seems to be working in parallel with the s4wiki, some other input attribute interferes with my understanding Cheesy

my actuator is too stiff so my WGDC range is limited in my current testing, but apart from easily going over the 22.5psi - I dont think that is causing the lack of IDC?  If the PID is the main culprit for this issue, once I have it aligned I will up the load to try and keep them aligned to see if the IDC increases/

Thanks for your patience and any pointers Smiley



Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2019, 01:14:21 PM »

The sensible thing is to set the MAF, KRKTE and TVUB to theoretical (you can scale all three from stock value based on the % change from stock hardware - diameter, injector size and fuel pressure, fuel pressure respectively), and trial/error scale KRKTE or MLHFM until your part trims are zero.

Then tweak TVUB until your idle trims are zero.

Then adjust KFLF, KFKHFM, or FKKVS for individual lean/rich spots.

You should never have to alter the fueling PID unless there is something extremely non-stock about your fueling/O2 set up.

I have no idea what PID "alignment" is, and if you actually mean the boost PID, which has nothing to do with fueling.

Going over the MAP limit doesn't affect fueling, but hitting the ps_w max does. I'd avoid worrying about any of that if you can't even get fueling right. Stick to 20-21 psi until you do. You are juggling way too many things at once. Stick to fixing one problem at a time.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2019, 01:20:39 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
BlackT
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1419



« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2019, 03:12:12 PM »

I think you didn't understand how KRKTE, and If I can remember there is map for max injection time but it doesnt stop on 18mS,
And I have totaly wrong settings for MAF and injectors, but ECU was still trying to reach desired AFR. So as nyet said, solve one by one. Or you will get chougt in circle without exit

Sorry tiping from my mobile phone
Edit:
Take a look at this you will make things more clear about KRKTE
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,320.msg6774.html#msg6774
« Last Edit: July 08, 2019, 03:51:22 PM by BlackT » Logged
fknbrkn
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +177/-18
Offline Offline

Posts: 1401


mk4 1.8T AUM


« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2019, 07:48:33 PM »

550s should easily holds up those 240gs
Why are you not making a logs? O2 correction,  fuel trims etc?
 Maybe it's just too low maf readings causing a lean condition

Absolutely awkward story here
Start from basics and read how the motronic works
If you reducing boost with a PID settings I'm not surprised you had similar problems with a fuel due to lack of knowledge
Logged
Awaken
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 84


« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2019, 01:23:28 AM »

I would advise to not use TVUB to adjust idle, as it reflects physical properties of the injectors. As a matter of fact the values that go in this table should be given by Bosch. I would use FKKVS for idle.
Logged
stuartdean
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 78


« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2019, 01:24:50 AM »

Thanks for you replies,
the reason I am adjusting the boost PID is because the actuator is stiffer.  I tried to run fixed WGDC to set up pre-control, but couldn't get over 20% without getting ignition retard.

I think I need to rollback to the beginning, the Turbo has a "Turbo Smart IWG75" I am unsure of what that is supposed to be for cracking pressure (some articles suggest 1 bar, others 11psi), with 2 turns of preload 0% WGDC was returning about 16psi.


here are a couple of logs showing the AFR following okay and another one where the actual was way off once the boost leading to ignition retard.

the AFR_BAD  file is all in 3rd gear - what I see quite often is under heavy load I get the selected gear showing up as gear 2 - I thought it might be the clutch slipping or something - but I check Vehicle Speed versus RPM in ECUPlot and it is a straight line.

I set the FKKVS table using the tool from here.


Thanks  I will also look at the KRKTE article referenced above.



Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2019, 08:48:42 AM »

I would advise to not use TVUB to adjust idle, as it reflects physical properties of the injectors. As a matter of fact the values that go in this table should be given by Bosch. I would use FKKVS for idle.

Disagree. In fact, FKKVS should be fine as all ones unless the fuel system is returnless.

Incorrect TVUB results in idle fueling being off (offset affects low pulsewidth more than anywhere else), which is why adjusting it may be required, especially if you only have reference values for a different fuel pressure.

In any case, ALL maps reflect physical properties. If the theoretical values were correct, none of the maps would need tuning.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2019, 08:50:46 AM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1277



« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2019, 10:34:24 AM »

Disagree. In fact, FKKVS should be fine as all ones unless the fuel system is returnless.

Incorrect TVUB results in idle fueling being off (offset affects low pulsewidth more than anywhere else), which is why adjusting it may be required, especially if you only have reference values for a different fuel pressure.

In any case, ALL maps reflect physical properties. If the theoretical values were correct, none of the maps would need tuning.

Btw. My original NA soft has KFKHFM all ones , and instead FKKVS is modified. also it has 4 bar fpr by factory and return system ofc.
Logged
Awaken
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 84


« Reply #12 on: July 09, 2019, 02:58:40 PM »

Disagree. In fact, FKKVS should be fine as all ones unless the fuel system is returnless.

Incorrect TVUB results in idle fueling being off (offset affects low pulsewidth more than anywhere else), which is why adjusting it may be required, especially if you only have reference values for a different fuel pressure.

In any case, ALL maps reflect physical properties. If the theoretical values were correct, none of the maps would need tuning.

Disagree about what exactly? TVUB should be correct, of course idle will be off if it is wrong, never said or implied it should be wrong. When I say that it reflects physical properties I mean it is more like a description of the injectors' physical open delay based on voltage more than it is a setting to play with to adjust idle. I think it should be set to whatever the manufacturer is recommending and not be used for idle corrections only because it happens to take more effect on idle and sounds like the best choice. I had much better results adjusting FKKVS in low rpm/ms area with my idle and simply think it's the better choice.

Adjusting TVUB essentially tells the ECU what time the injector needs before it opens and starts letting fuel in. If you change it, yes it affects idle, but it just gives the ECU false data, which in my opinion is not the best solution to idle problems given there's a cleaner alternative.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2019, 03:10:00 PM by Awaken » Logged
Awaken
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 84


« Reply #13 on: July 09, 2019, 03:03:51 PM »

Here is some reading material from Bosch about their injectors, including TVUB, I think it is interesting... probably already seen by many, but still...
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2019, 07:12:33 PM »

I had much better results adjusting FKKVS in low rpm/ms area with my idle and simply think it's the better choice.

This depends on entirely on two things

1) the source of the error
2) if you want to correct the source of the error in the "correct" map or you want to use the map that you are most comfortable editing and/or ends up with the best results.

FKKVS is the returnless fueling correction map. It can be used to correct for other things
KFLF and KFKHFM can also be used to correct fueling that isn't lambda req or MAF related.

If part/full throttle fueling is dead on correct but idle fueling is off, the most common reason is TVUB is calibrated incorrectly (most often due to aging injectors or non-stock FPRs which move latency around)

YMMV, can agree to disagree, there are a zillion ways to skin a cat.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2019, 07:14:25 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.026 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)