totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 14, 2019, 03:42:27 PM »
|
|
|
Use values of IMX from this file i dont see here overboosting But what i see is bad tuned KFMIRL
Your LDRXN at 5250 RPM is 175 % load --> 175% load and 5250 RPM tru KFMIOP in your map is about 90% tourqe request --> 90% tourqe at 5200 RPM tru KFMIRL in your map is around 160-165%
Soo at first you are requesting 175% load, but tru tourqe maps ecu calculated to request 165% load. And there all shit start to hapen, it has nothing to do with your IMX
So I should change LDRXN to 165 to limit rlmax?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 14, 2019, 03:53:46 PM »
|
|
|
Sorry but can't anwer you precise without log with variables I tell you to log Also log ldrlts
|
|
« Last Edit: August 14, 2019, 03:58:05 PM by BlackT »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 14, 2019, 04:11:08 PM »
|
|
|
Use values of IMX from this file i dont see here overboosting But what i see is bad tuned KFMIRL
Your LDRXN at 5250 RPM is 175 % load --> 175% load and 5250 RPM tru KFMIOP in your map is about 90% tourqe request --> 90% tourqe at 5200 RPM tru KFMIRL in your map is around 160-165%
Soo at first you are requesting 175% load, but tru tourqe maps ecu calculated to request 165% load. And there all shit start to hapen, it has nothing to do with your IMX
Forget about this calculation, without mifa and misol it can't be calculated it this way
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 14, 2019, 09:53:03 PM »
|
|
|
Sorry but can't anwer you precise without log with variables I tell you to log Also log ldrlts
I've logged all of the variables what you mentioned.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #34 on: August 14, 2019, 10:52:01 PM »
|
|
|
Ahhhh.... Step 1 Change IMX to values you already have in you map when you don't have overboost Step 2 Flash you file to car Step 3 Take logs Step 4 post your logs and bin here
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #35 on: August 15, 2019, 01:12:53 AM »
|
|
|
Ahhhh.... Step 1 Change IMX to values you already have in you map when you don't have overboost Step 2 Flash you file to car Step 3 Take logs Step 4 post your logs and bin here
Ok that was my fault. I thought that you need these variables to tell the LDRXN value. I will do a log with the modified IMX table.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #36 on: August 18, 2019, 09:23:53 AM »
|
|
|
HI,
I cannot reproduce the behaviour. Currently I've this logs with the bin.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #37 on: August 18, 2019, 10:38:46 PM »
|
|
|
I don't think your IRL is requesting enough load, rlsol is dropping off below rlmax
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #38 on: August 19, 2019, 03:55:11 AM »
|
|
|
I don't think your IRL is requesting enough load, rlsol is dropping off below rlmax
Why should I change IRL? What about change rlmax to lower? The requested boost curve is what I need.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #39 on: August 19, 2019, 09:36:24 AM »
|
|
|
Why should I change IRL? What about change rlmax to lower? The requested boost curve is what I need.
Sure, if you like. its better to implement taper with rlmax than IRL because IRL can get bumpy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #40 on: August 19, 2019, 10:05:55 AM »
|
|
|
Sure, if you like.
its better to implement taper with rlmax than IRL because IRL can get bumpy.
Thanks, so I should change LDRXN? If I know well this is the rlmax variable.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #41 on: August 19, 2019, 10:11:37 AM »
|
|
|
Yep.
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #42 on: August 19, 2019, 10:48:18 AM »
|
|
|
Why should I change IRL? What about change rlmax to lower? The requested boost curve is what I need.
Look at page before, i show you what values you need to change
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #43 on: August 19, 2019, 11:32:09 AM »
|
|
|
Look at page before, i show you what values you need to change
Thanks. But I don't want to more load at 6000rpm, that's why I would like to change rlmax(LDRXN) a little bit down.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #44 on: August 19, 2019, 11:38:36 AM »
|
|
|
If you change rlmax, your misol will drop down. And that will result even worse intervention. You will need to put higher values in KFMIRL. Than you can lover down LDRXN
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|