|
airtite
|
 |
« on: September 04, 2019, 04:10:05 AM »
|
|
|
Please can someone confirm cdkat is at 181A0 in the following file. The value I am seeing is already 0 which I thought you had to set to 0 to disable rear cat? http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4445.0;attach=28860So new topic for a new car/project. Car is a 2005 Misano red saloon with 145000km. I have had the car for about 3 months now and just been doing odds and ends on her..... gearbox service, cam belt and accessories. I have an airbag light on and after lots of digging and checking have traced that to a airbag control unit which is on its way from someone in germany. Car is in having a complete 3" full stainless exhaust built and I need to code out the cats and then start playing properly with the tune. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2019, 08:01:46 AM »
|
|
|
cdkat at 181A2?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2019, 09:24:07 AM »
|
|
|
That file has tuner protection.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2019, 09:42:02 AM »
|
|
|
Thanks Nyet, I see the posts about it. I have made a few changes and I havent had the mil yet. I see everyone says use an older software version is that file on here somewhere? a link would be great
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2019, 01:36:19 AM »
|
|
|
question everyone says use software 366304 but there seems to be quite a few differences between the files which I dont think are related to the tuner protection but actual maps... screenshot below of the 1st fee differences.
1st off so I should be able to just load up a 366304 original file straight to my ecu with no issues?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2019, 08:08:03 AM »
|
|
|
yes you should be able to
note that i was *told* B has tuner protection, I don't know this for a fact. If it works for you and you have the maps for it, i'd stick to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2019, 08:42:50 AM »
|
|
|
Its not my daily so havent put so many miles onto it so it might trip the mil.... I have modified it enough to blow my intercooler hoses off twice now  re the maps I am not 100% sure about the xdf that I have so I am having to double check alot.... cdkat for example is not right. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2019, 05:03:02 AM »
|
|
|
full 3inch turbo back stainless with x pipe... sounds amazing and not as loud as expected.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SQT
Full Member
Karma: +2/-4
 Offline
Posts: 57
Respectfully SQT ;)
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2019, 06:06:09 AM »
|
|
|
full 3inch turbo back stainless with x pipe... sounds amazing and not as loud as expected.
straight pipe, without silencers? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
a6 2.7
sorry for my English
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2019, 09:12:21 AM »
|
|
|
i also have a bit of a better mappack for the non-letter RS6 ... ill post it if i get a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2019, 02:07:11 AM »
|
|
|
straight pipe, without silencers?
Yup |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2019, 02:11:25 AM »
|
|
|
i also have a bit of a better mappack for the non-letter RS6 ... ill post it if i get a chance.
please that would help alot... I seem to have lost quite a bit of top end with the new exhaust. However low down torque and spool is alot more. Need to do some logging tonight. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2019, 08:40:24 AM »
|
|
|
However low down torque and spool is alot more.
Be careful with that unless it is a 6sp |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Blazius
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2019, 08:46:07 AM »
|
|
|
I was under the impression that smaller exhaust provides a bit more lowend and loses on topend than vs a 3inch ( a 2.5 for example) , this obviously depends on engine size and setup but from what Ive seen on youtube, thats how it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2019, 03:21:15 PM »
|
|
|
I was under the impression that smaller exhaust provides a bit more lowend and loses on topend than vs a 3inch ( a 2.5 for example) , this obviously depends on engine size and setup but from what Ive seen on youtube, thats how it is.
How about learning some basics about forced induction engines? What a load of BS. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
