Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: DSG Fix limiter on med9 Ecu how to ??  (Read 14174 times)
romano21
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« on: October 02, 2019, 08:01:40 AM »

Hello all !

 i work on golf 6 R20 270hp and after good remap i have a only little gain.

i can feel hesitation du to my DSG Torque limiter.

i know it's possible to tell the DSG computer you are making less torque
I can scale/edit the torque values ( factor ) to appear lower in the med9 ecu.

do you know wath function or factor i need mod for that ?

sorry for my english !

Thank's in advance


Logged
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-114
Offline Offline

Posts: 1070


« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2019, 08:17:28 AM »

If it was a good remap, you would have BIG gains, not only "little gain". you need to work harder and go back to the basics of the ECU.
Logged

I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
cherry
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260


« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2019, 01:27:45 PM »

Change torque limit in DSG. All other solutions is just not correct...

CDLF should have about 350NM from factory and in these cars DSG is limited to 380NM. You can also see torque limitation in measured blocks, should be 122.4
Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2019, 05:23:31 PM »

Change torque limit in DSG. All other solutions is just not correct...

CDLF should have about 350NM from factory and in these cars DSG is limited to 380NM. You can also see torque limitation in measured blocks, should be 122.4

DSG software is 350Nm limiter, not 380.

Reducing MDNORM from 500 to 340 is enough for a stage 1. It's not true that this is an "incorrect" way to do it as a stage 1 won't require higher RPM or torque handling that a TCU flash will give.
Logged
cherry
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260


« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2019, 08:10:22 PM »

DSG software is 350Nm limiter, not 380.

Reducing MDNORM from 500 to 340 is enough for a stage 1. It's not true that this is an "incorrect" way to do it as a stage 1 won't require higher RPM or torque handling that a TCU flash will give.

Don´t claim something if you didnt check it...
There are few versions with more than 350NM allowed. In attach a DQ250 file from Golf R and other DQ250 file from Passat TDI. I think you will find the offsets yourself. Btw ori shift rpm should be 6700...

I still think it´s not a good idea to cheat torque and let the tcu calculate with 100NM less, maybe think about clutch slip regulation and wear. Change tcu torque limit is 5min job.

Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-480
Offline Offline

Posts: 6035


« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2019, 12:11:22 AM »

DSG software is 350Nm limiter, not 380.

Reducing MDNORM from 500 to 340 is enough for a stage 1. It's not true that this is an "incorrect" way to do it as a stage 1 won't require higher RPM or torque handling that a TCU flash will give.

Of course it's incorrect, since all torque reported to the gearbox is wrong. 500 to 340 is especially stupid.
Torque is I feedforward in DSG, and you're reducing feedforward by over 30%, causing permanent clutch slip all the damn time.

If you want to cheat torque there is absolutely nothing required to do with mdnorm in the first place.

This thread is idiotic too - "I can feel" bla bla - no you can't feel shit. Log.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2019, 12:14:17 AM by prj » Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
msundercober
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2019, 04:30:23 AM »

Of course it's incorrect, since all torque reported to the gearbox is wrong. 500 to 340 is especially stupid.
Torque is I feedforward in DSG, and you're reducing feedforward by over 30%, causing permanent clutch slip all the damn time.

If you want to cheat torque there is absolutely nothing required to do with mdnorm in the first place.

This thread is idiotic too - "I can feel" bla bla - no you can't feel shit. Log.

+1
Logged
cherry
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260


« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2019, 05:44:11 AM »

...and if you do not have tool for DSG there are services now which offer you DSG tuning in sgo format. So you can flash with normal tools, e.g. VCP, AVDI, VVDI or some cracked VAS tool...
Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2019, 05:10:18 PM »

Don´t claim something if you didnt check it...
There are few versions with more than 350NM allowed. In attach a DQ250 file from Golf R and other DQ250 file from Passat TDI. I think you will find the offsets yourself. Btw ori shift rpm should be 6700...

I still think it´s not a good idea to cheat torque and let the tcu calculate with 100NM less, maybe think about clutch slip regulation and wear. Change tcu torque limit is 5min job.



You should check yourself. That 380 is max torque is an upper protection tripwire mmr_MMaxGetriebeschutz_ko.

MmrTemperaMmax_kl caps TQ at 350 up until 138deg C then the TQ limit drops to 15Nm.
Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2019, 05:11:28 PM »

Of course it's incorrect, since all torque reported to the gearbox is wrong. 500 to 340 is especially stupid.
Torque is I feedforward in DSG, and you're reducing feedforward by over 30%, causing permanent clutch slip all the damn time.

If you want to cheat torque there is absolutely nothing required to do with mdnorm in the first place.

This thread is idiotic too - "I can feel" bla bla - no you can't feel shit. Log.

Incorrect is thus subjective. There is no clutch slip in a sensible stage 1 with TQ output called at 340. As for saying it has nothing to do with MDNORM, it absolutely does. The ECU will never report more than what MDNORM is capped to.
Logged
cherry
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260


« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2019, 06:45:34 PM »

You should check yourself. That 380 is max torque is an upper protection tripwire mmr_MMaxGetriebeschutz_ko.

MmrTemperaMmax_kl caps TQ at 350 up until 138deg C then the TQ limit drops to 15Nm.

Attached Passat CFGB is 380NM from factory, can you explain this? ;-) In my opinion this map is active from 138° only, not before. But i dont have FR for it.

Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2019, 12:18:01 AM »

Attached Passat CFGB is 380NM from factory, can you explain this? ;-) In my opinion this map is active from 138° only, not before. But i dont have FR for it.



First of all, we're talking about Golf R DSG boxes here, you've thrown in a random Passat file. Secondly, mmr_MMaxGetriebeschutz_ko in that Passat file is 390Nm, and the vehicle output is officially 170PS/350Nm. The temp limiter MmrTemperaMmax_kl is still 350 though.

As for your opinion on how active that map works, that's wrong. See attachment. From 0-138deg, it will allow 350Nm. Between 138 and 145, it will interpolate between 350 and 15Nm, dropping TQ all the way to 145.
Logged
jochen_145
Full Member
***

Karma: +9/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2019, 03:01:32 AM »

Incorrect is thus subjective. There is no clutch slip in a sensible stage 1 with TQ output called at 340.
Only, if your stage1 has NOT more 340Nm indicated.

Quote
As for saying it has nothing to do with MDNORM, it absolutely does. The ECU will never report more than what MDNORM is capped to.
that´s correct:
ECU will limit all communicated torque to 340Nm.

Problem on this:
MO1 and M06 torque is indicated, so flywheeltroque is mutch less then 340Nm

All torque higher than 340Nm indicated are cutted and all feed forward torques are worng.

As well as all adapted torque-to-pressure values ...

Only mirco-slip-controler will learn, but has mutch trouble, if differend learn value for same communicated torque higher then 340Nm indicated.

So even on stage1 tuning this way is a VERY BAD idea !


to keep it short:
all ideas, NOT to tell actual torque correctly to DCTs is CRAP.


« Last Edit: October 05, 2019, 03:33:38 AM by jochen_145 » Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2019, 03:54:18 AM »

Only, if your stage1 has NOT more 340Nm indicated.
that´s correct:
ECU will limit all communicated torque to 340Nm.

Problem on this:
MO1 and M06 torque is indicated, so flywheeltroque is mutch less then 340Nm

All torque higher than 340Nm indicated are cutted and all feed forward torques are worng.

As well as all adapted torque-to-pressure values ...

Only mirco-slip-controler will learn, but has mutch trouble, if differend learn value for same communicated torque higher then 340Nm indicated.

So even on stage1 tuning this way is a VERY BAD idea !


to keep it short:
all ideas, NOT to tell actual torque correctly to DCTs is CRAP.




With this hysteresis around accurate torque reporting, you would think that 1Nm over "reported" would cause the clutches to slip. I understand how the DSG generates clamping pressure and how the microslip controller works, but a healthy DSG gearbox produces enough clamping pressure at reported 340Nm to hold much more. At the end of the day, there are thousands of DSG cars with MDNORM reduced running absolutely fine. I would never recommend running this with much more torque, but stock DSG with 340Nm reported is more than capable of holding stage 1 torque. The whole issue around the reported number is semantics at this point.
Logged
jochen_145
Full Member
***

Karma: +9/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2019, 04:20:25 AM »

With this hysteresis around accurate torque reporting, you would think that 1Nm over "reported" would cause the clutches to slip
Depending on actual situation and amound of troque you are running.
On launch and high speed gradients, you will get in trouble, if the actual torque differs less the 10Nm to communicated torqure, even if the inertia of the engine is low.

Quote
I understand how the DSG generates clamping pressure and how the microslip controller works, but a healthy DSG gearbox produces enough clamping pressure at reported 340Nm to hold much more.

Yes, if you are in status "fahren" and the micro-slip-control adapt to mirco-slip-speed-limit and press "correct" to actual troque.
So it will work in this special condition. But you will see, micro-slipp-controller needs some time to reduce slipping.
All controled situations will get in trouble, if the communcated torque is incorrect. So off-going clutch during torque-hand-over e.g. or most importanted: launches poweron-downshifts.

Quote
At the end of the day, there are thousands of DSG cars with MDNORM reduced running absolutely fine. I would never recommend running this with much more torque, but stock DSG with 340Nm reported is more than capable of holding stage 1 torque. The whole issue around the reported number is semantics at this point.
Cannot match to this !
Take a look at clutch slip of the shafts and calculate the energie you loose by slip, you will see how mutch stress you will put into the system, when you running at torques higher MDNORM indicated.

Running alltime short-hard shifts and fast launches, you will not sense the shocks, you will get by incorrect troque, because the kind of application shocks by physiks.

But if you want to have a smoose and findly clutch control even on high torque, you need to tell correct torque to DCT.

And this will not happend, if you cut the high torque communicated on you "stage1" tuning.

The point is:
as long as you are running lower the MDNORM indicated, the DCT will work with proper communicted torque and work well.
This will be the cause of most times running a stage1 tuning.

But racing or mutch time running above MDNORM, will have bad impact to livetime of clutches and DCTs
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.05 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)