Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: RLSOL_W and RLMAX_W are << RLMX_W what is block it?  (Read 6662 times)
pieros_net
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« on: January 04, 2021, 12:44:10 PM »

goodevening guys,
I'm facing problem on engine load.
I want to command aroud 340%-350% and by kfmirl,kfmiop,ldrxn all should be ok in order to reach it.
but, as you can see on attached log, even if specified load is there (350) the requested remain around 310%

someone can help me to understand from where coming this limit. no any ignition retard faced.

thank you

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2021, 01:48:35 PM »

ldrlts
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
pieros_net
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2021, 02:11:08 PM »

ldrlts

KFLHBN via ldrlts.
I set values maximum possible (3.98bar)
even desidered pressure are more high than actual.

maybe the problem is on my hack 5120?


Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2021, 04:06:33 PM »

given that every single load variable is doubled? Ya, I'd say you screwed something up, or your .ecu is wrong.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
tao13
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +17/-47
Offline Offline

Posts: 471


« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2021, 06:44:33 AM »

what boost fo you have on the gauge? in log maximum boost is 1.9bar.
Logged
pieros_net
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2021, 10:47:19 AM »

2.4 bar on the gauge!
What maps on hack 5120 I  have to scale for alignment ?

Thanks
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2021, 04:18:20 PM »

Again, why are you ignoring the fact that your load readings are totally wrong?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2021, 04:19:24 PM »

log ps_w and it will be immediately obvious this is very very wrong.

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
pieros_net
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2021, 01:04:19 AM »

Again, why are you ignoring the fact that your load readings are totally wrong?
Goodmorning,
Right now I'm modifying properly the .ECU file of me7logger. I did as per your "my_8D0907551M-5120.ecu ".
For all variables mbar I multiplied by two.
afternoon I will log in order to see if engine load will read properly.
load should be showed scaled as the boost pressure?
Logged
tao13
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +17/-47
Offline Offline

Posts: 471


« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2021, 10:01:08 AM »

like nyet said and i asked you about boost, something wrong in your file.ecu or in the 5120 hacked file. ldrxn is "aproximatly" your boost if you apply WIKI formula but in your last log it is wrong.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2021, 10:51:06 AM »

Wait, did you just change the .ecu file w/o doing 5120 ASM changes?

that's not going to work, because it doesn't look like the 5120 change (if you have it) is handling load correctly.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
pieros_net
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2021, 02:46:01 AM »

HI friend,
I fixed .ecu file in order to read correctly boost.
I logged even ps_w, but i'm not able to interpretate it and in case of any adjustment really I dont know where mod.
I need your help.
I reckeck even all hack 5120 mod as per guide and all is ok.
boost logged is same of boost read on gauge.

attached my last log.
waiting some suggestion...
thank you in adavance
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2021, 10:40:52 AM »

looks good but you are def limited by ldrlts

the hbd -> ldrlts (load) calculation is the inverse of req load -> req boost, but you can see it is significantly lower than rlmx, you're at the max of the hbn map. You will likely need to hack it out or scale hbn even more, or convert hbn to a direct load limit.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
pieros_net
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2021, 02:19:10 AM »

thank you to everybody.
right now I solved it by increase 10% the values on KFURL.
requested load now is properly high than real engine load.



Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2021, 02:37:46 AM »

thank you to everybody.
right now I solved it by increase 10% the values on KFURL.
requested load now is properly high than real engine load.


this may have other unintended consequences.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.019 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)