silentbob
Full Member
Karma: +30/-1
 Offline
Posts: 141
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: May 08, 2012, 10:47:16 PM »
|
|
|
silentbob, what are these functions SAWE, LSD, DASHPOD? I couldn't find these functions in my funktiosnrahmen file....
ARMD I have disabled, but want to turn off all these other functions...
P.S> Those are all "comfort" functions? Are there any more that could intervene with torque limited by kfmirl (ldrxn) and kfmiop? I'm looking for a way to simulate drive by cable behaviour...
These functions all influence how torque is delivered in different dynamic stituations. It's all in MDFAW (page 605). SAWE = torque ramping when going into pull with fuel cutoff and when injection is enabled again LSD = torque ramping with positive load jump DASHPOD = torque ramping with negative load jump Theres also MDBG to limit the max torque gradient. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #61 on: May 08, 2012, 11:20:21 PM »
|
|
|
These functions all influence how torque is delivered in different dynamic stituations. It's all in MDFAW (page 605).
SAWE = torque ramping when going into pull with fuel cutoff and when injection is enabled again
LSD = torque ramping with positive load jump
DASHPOD = torque ramping with negative load jump
Theres also MDBG to limit the max torque gradient.
Thank you! So I'm trying to disable them all it this way: LSD: VLSD -> FF SAWE: NGFSAWE -> FF (not sure if this engine speed threshold should be 00 or FF though) DASHPOD: VDASH -> FF MDBGRG seems to be already disabled by default (VMIBGR -> FF) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
julex
|
|
« Reply #63 on: May 10, 2012, 07:15:34 AM »
|
|
|
Definitely. Maybe finally we can figure out to have really snappy engine instead of slow ramp up moderated by these functions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #64 on: May 10, 2012, 08:04:08 AM »
|
|
|
Definitely. Maybe finally we can figure out to have really snappy engine instead of slow ramp up moderated by these functions.
IMO that is the biggest issue with running ME7 on more wild setups. It is also IMO why K04 cars are generally faster then other BT/wild setups. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Snow Trooper
|
|
« Reply #65 on: May 10, 2012, 11:56:22 AM »
|
|
|
Exactly, my car flips out on good fuel when I try to be at the limit.
Even on pump 1-3 can be held back.
Along these same lines we also need a real edl turn off, esp and so on. Obviously only for occasional fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #66 on: May 10, 2012, 12:18:23 PM »
|
|
|
Exactly, my car flips out on good fuel when I try to be at the limit.
The only remaining intervention should be B_lsd I dont see a good reason to disable DASH or SAW, unless somebody shows me logs to the contrary. Along these same lines we also need a real edl turn off, esp and so on. Obviously only for occasional fun.
I hate both. Especially EDL. As far as i can tell, there is no way to disable it in the ECU (only the fuse 42 trick). We have to get into the ABS controller. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 10, 2012, 12:21:06 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #67 on: May 10, 2012, 01:55:22 PM »
|
|
|
What about FUEDKSA? Just saw today this function when I was translating maps... There are some maps mentioning de-jitter and limitation  P.S> FPWDKAPP map is VERY interesting... It allows us to force pedal = throttle plate or am I wrong? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 10, 2012, 02:11:40 PM by masterj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
marcellus
|
|
« Reply #68 on: May 12, 2012, 02:39:15 PM »
|
|
|
Looking at the G-box XDF, KFDMDARO is in location 0x1DE7E. You listed it as 0x1dE7C. Is the difference m-box vs. G-box?
"Upper threshold for torque engagement" - KFDMDARO
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #69 on: May 12, 2012, 02:42:01 PM »
|
|
|
Looking at the G-box XDF, KFDMDARO is in location 0x1DE7E. You listed it as 0x1dE7C. Is the difference m-box vs. G-box?
"Upper threshold for torque engagement" - KFDMDARO
Yes. Everybody already has a complete G-box, so there is no point in posting G-box locations. The m-box xdf that is floating around is probably mine; it is very incomplete since every map was found by hand. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
marcellus
|
|
« Reply #70 on: May 12, 2012, 02:54:03 PM »
|
|
|
What I am asking, since I am still trying to figure stuff out, is if the location is different because of the different boxes. I went to the location you said and didnt get the values you got. No where close. So I decided to look around before asking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #71 on: May 12, 2012, 04:37:49 PM »
|
|
|
What I am asking, since I am still trying to figure stuff out, is if the location is different because of the different boxes. I went to the location you said and didnt get the values you got. No where close. So I decided to look around before asking.
same situation here... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #72 on: May 12, 2012, 10:30:01 PM »
|
|
|
same situation here...
You're using g-box? I don't understand what you're saying :/ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #73 on: May 12, 2012, 10:31:22 PM »
|
|
|
What I am asking, since I am still trying to figure stuff out, is if the location is different because of the different boxes.
Yes. The binaries are all laid out differently (with very few exceptions), which is why they have different version letters. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #74 on: May 13, 2012, 10:36:54 AM »
|
|
|
Right, there's just too much ambiguity in how the table and axis are defined. I'm just going to wait until your xdf releases...
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 13, 2012, 10:38:48 AM by nehalem »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
