kenmac
Full Member
Karma: +6/-0
 Offline
Posts: 161
|
 |
« on: September 17, 2012, 11:25:13 PM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2012, 03:50:55 AM »
|
|
|
More than 10* igniton retard?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kenmac
Full Member
Karma: +6/-0
Offline
Posts: 161
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2012, 08:34:36 AM »
|
|
|
More than 10* igniton retard?
It's 9* on this particular pull, but it's typically around 5* - 6*. Boost was turned up a tad, but yeah I plan to tone it down a bit. Either way, I don't think it's the cause of the load plateauing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2012, 08:56:57 AM »
|
|
|
Instead of posting huge screenshots, please post your logs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2012, 08:59:26 AM »
|
|
|
It's 9* on this particular pull, but it's typically around 5* - 6*. Boost was turned up a tad, but yeah I plan to tone it down a bit. Either way, I don't think it's the cause of the load plateauing.
Why not? It does look like a hard cap, but I don't think you can max out rlsol_w. Did you log rlmx_w? If rl_w was capped below rlmax_w then I would think differently, but actual is following desired and desired is following corrected. Look at LDRLMX. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2012, 09:05:50 AM »
|
|
|
Instead of posting huge screenshots, please post your logs.
I like graphs. Also, look at KFLDHBN |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2012, 09:06:48 AM »
|
|
|
Could this be torque monitoring or something else? Or is this completely normal?
Torque monitoring does not alter requested load that I know of |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
littco
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2012, 09:14:21 AM »
|
|
|
whats your LDRXNZK set to? with that amount of timing pull could it just not be that the load is having to follow LDRXNZK?
On my S3 timing CF's went up to 12 but on my A4 it only goes to 9...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2012, 09:17:20 AM »
|
|
|
Torque monitoring does not alter requested load that I know of
I does, through milsol_w. MDKOL can lower the torque request input to KFMIRL. Edit: The fact that rlsol_w is following rlmax_w shows that it is being limited in LDRLMX and not from MDKOL. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 18, 2012, 09:21:18 AM by phila_dot »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2012, 09:30:17 AM »
|
|
|
whats your LDRXNZK set to? with that amount of timing pull could it just not be that the load is having to follow LDRXNZK?
On my S3 timing CF's went up to 12 but on my A4 it only goes to 9...
LDRXNZK is usually not the issue as it is often the same or higher load values than LDRXN. Also, I remember that the "continuous knock" condition is not as it sounds. IIRC, there is a seperate sub-function in LDRLMX for load limitation from KR. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2012, 09:46:01 AM »
|
|
|
I does, through milsol_w. MDKOL can lower the torque request input to KFMIRL.
Edit: The fact that rlsol_w is following rlmax_w shows that it is being limited in LDRLMX and not from MDKOL.
Interesting. At WOT, under what conditions would this occur? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2012, 10:40:02 AM »
|
|
|
Interesting. At WOT, under what conditions would this occur?
Honestly, I haven't looked to much into it because I've never had an issue (that I've noticed). It's mostly intervention from external requests...ASR, MSR, gear shift, NMAX, VMAX, idle speed control, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2012, 09:01:53 PM »
|
|
|
LDRXNZK is not a factor because it is disabled from the factory.
B_kfzk will never get set because CNOKT = 0 and KFSWKFZK = -96 in all cells.
Had to go back and look because I remembered that it could be disregarded but forget the details as to why.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
