NefMoto > Technical > Tuning > gear dependant boost
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »
Author Topic: gear dependant boost  (Read 34922 times)
Vdub-dub
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 136
« Reply #30 on: January 01, 2013, 04:28:36 AM »
Quote from: userpike on December 30, 2012, 10:49:07 AM
how does the ECU know which gear you are in if your car is manual??? On my '02GTI 1.8t AWP HS box/o2j tranns there are no sensors going to the tranny except for the reverse light nor sensors connected to the gear shifter inside the car. Please explain.

May need to change NVQUOT-- if change box/ratios
But if use VCDS and meas blocks notice picks up each gear very quickly
Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763
« Reply #31 on: January 01, 2013, 08:29:34 AM »
Quote from: Vdub-dub on January 01, 2013, 04:28:36 AM
May need to change NVQUOT-- if change box/ratios
But if use VCDS and meas blocks notice picks up each gear very quickly

Good to know as I have the parts in my shed to put together an 02j trans with a 4.23 ring and Eurospecsport close ratio gear set with .81 5th. just need to do it ha!

Which measuring block number/s or you talking about. I would like to see this for myself!

Thank you for your input Vdub-dub!
Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763
« Reply #32 on: June 20, 2013, 06:31:17 PM »
Seems pointless to leave the post I did to start a thread that had already been started. so its cleaned up even more now. wow the words can glow...this is about useless but for some reason entertaining. I guess it's the simple things...lol
« Last Edit: June 21, 2013, 05:20:02 PM by userpike » Logged
k0mpresd
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +146/-54
Offline Offline

Posts: 1655
« Reply #33 on: June 20, 2013, 07:04:18 PM »
im thinking there already a thread about this and map for it as well.
Logged
carsey
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +7/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 401
« Reply #34 on: June 20, 2013, 07:05:03 PM »
Theres a topic in the reverse engineering section (i think) that discusses this.   map selection Wink
Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709
« Reply #35 on: June 20, 2013, 07:18:51 PM »
There's numerous threads on this topic.

Use MDBGRGA not KFMDBGRG, unless you like wonky timing
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640
« Reply #36 on: June 20, 2013, 07:22:47 PM »
I was going to link him to it until I noticed he was posting in there, so obviously aware of it.
Logged
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763
« Reply #37 on: June 20, 2013, 10:23:08 PM »
Quote from: ddillenger on June 20, 2013, 07:22:47 PM
I was going to link him to it until I noticed he was posting in there, so obviously aware of it.

I totally forgot about this thread...thanks for moving mine over to it.
Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763
« Reply #38 on: June 20, 2013, 10:26:03 PM »
Can anyone answer my question to Vdub about the measuring blocks in VCDS? I checked the Ross-Tech site and didn't find anything about this.
Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763
« Reply #39 on: June 21, 2013, 05:23:14 PM »
edited because it was no longer valid.
Logged
automan001
Full Member
***

Karma: +47/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 153
« Reply #40 on: October 02, 2013, 01:43:24 AM »
Quote from: phila_dot on June 20, 2013, 07:18:51 PM
Use MDBGRGA not KFMDBGRG, unless you like wonky timing
When first time looked at MDBGRG definition I thought there should be no difference between influence of these two tables to timing.
Then I've noticed mibgr_w which goes from KFMDBGRG into MDKOG function.
Is this the reason why KFMDBGRG table is not preferrable? How exactly does it change timing, just reduces when it hits the limit?
« Last Edit: October 02, 2013, 02:09:53 AM by automan001 » Logged
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306
« Reply #41 on: October 04, 2013, 01:40:31 PM »
Quote from: automan001 on October 02, 2013, 01:43:24 AM
When first time looked at MDBGRG definition I thought there should be no difference between influence of these two tables to timing.
Then I've noticed mibgr_w which goes from KFMDBGRG into MDKOG function.
Is this the reason why KFMDBGRG table is not preferrable? How exactly does it change timing, just reduces when it hits the limit?

When I tried it I ended up with very crippled timing... it was very low.
So now I'm going to use MDBGRGA
Logged
hammersword
Full Member
***

Karma: +31/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 136

Revlimit ECU tuning


WWW
« Reply #42 on: October 04, 2013, 04:40:06 PM »
check

Alfa Romeo 1.8TBi 200hp file and you will see how Bosch makes boost per gear
Also in 207 1.6THP there is the 2nd gear torque limiter, you can learn from this also

It is an excellent feature that Bosch includes in Motronic software but requires a perfect calibrated torque model and not the
300% IRL - 100% IOP - 300% LDRXN
Logged
www.revlimit.gr
The Motronic Specialists....
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Navigation
Personal Tools
  • November 27, 2024, 07:36:53 PM
  • Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?

    Login with username, password and session length
Search
 
Advanced Search
About Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved 2010 Nefarious Motosports
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)