Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 37
Author Topic: The 5120 hack - Running up to 5bar absolute pressure on ME7.x  (Read 331897 times)
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #315 on: July 23, 2013, 10:43:12 AM »

Hiccups are still there with halved KISRM. I am getting mysterious PS_W drop with associated RL_W and fueling going awry per my wideband O2 although ECU things everything is ok, of course. NWS switchover is at 4k and I see associated activity so I don't think this is the culprit, but here is the KFURL as requested.

Please look at my log, row 88 and 89. PS_W drops again and so does RL_W... I will welcome any suggestions.

Edit: I will log pvdkds_w to see if I am not hitting psmx_w (I don't have memory address for psmx_w, but pvdkds_w will suffice) and therefore limit the ps_w.

this is curious

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #316 on: July 23, 2013, 11:28:18 AM »

*FACEPALM*

Mystery solved... my KFMLDMX table was not adjusted from old stock sized intake tract and now with all RS4 or larger stuff my MAF is hitting new heights. I hit and exceeded flow threshold in this table. ECU switched to normalized flow and hence the fueling going off. Obviously I need to massage the tables for MAFless path, at least put them on the rich side so that engine doesn't blow up when maf readings are off.

Curiously enough, I remember getting beeps and check engine light combined with limp mode when I had this happening previously and I am not sure why this time around this didn't happen... maybe there is a certain threshold you need to go over to get that (too lazy to follow FR on this).

This issue is solved then.
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #317 on: July 23, 2013, 11:36:04 AM »

Def. work on those throttle maps. When calculated and measured are perfectly parallel, it makes me happy.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Axis
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #318 on: July 23, 2013, 11:47:07 AM »

Edit: I will log pvdkds_w to see if I am not hitting psmx_w (I don't have memory address for psmx_w, but pvdkds_w will suffice) and therefore limit the ps_w.
psmx_w  should be 0x382188  0.0390625   though I understand you'll do without it. Just working on my IDA skills.
Might help someone else.
Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #319 on: July 24, 2013, 06:04:23 AM »

psmx_w  should be 0x382188  0.0390625   though I understand you'll do without it. Just working on my IDA skills.
Might help someone else.

Thanks man.
Logged
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306


« Reply #320 on: July 25, 2013, 07:28:06 AM »

Does anyone know if the limit for KFLDHBN is 4 bar?
I think I've run into the limit of requested boost pressure ratio again.
The stock setting was 3 bar which I raised to 4, but now I'm requesting 4 bar and the max value it will take in TunerPro is 3.9844, which is FF in hex of course...

So this is a slight problem lol. Can we internally scale KFLDHBN?

And yes I'm really running up to and including 40psi on the street - which seems to be the limit of requested boost I can get lol.
Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-480
Offline Offline

Posts: 6034


« Reply #321 on: July 25, 2013, 08:26:41 AM »

Sure you can, shift pu left once before it gets multiplied by the kfldhbn value, done.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
Bische
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +25/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 397



WWW
« Reply #322 on: July 26, 2013, 01:44:11 AM »

Great job BT, do we need to start on the 10240 hack? Wink
Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #323 on: July 26, 2013, 07:48:21 AM »

Great job BT, do we need to start on the 10240 hack? Wink

He is dangerously close to that one... 48psi [Smiley]
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #324 on: July 26, 2013, 08:26:14 AM »

He is dangerously close to that one... 48psi [Smiley]

Just needs to find a 5 bar MAP sensor.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306


« Reply #325 on: July 26, 2013, 11:34:26 AM »

Just needs to find a 5 bar MAP sensor.

Incorrect the KFLDHBN is still limited to a pressure ratio of 4.
So even with a 5 bar requested boost will not go above 4... that's my problem lol.
Logged
matchew
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +47/-22
Offline Offline

Posts: 503


« Reply #326 on: July 26, 2013, 11:38:29 AM »

Incorrect the KFLDHBN is still limited to a pressure ratio of 4.
So even with a 5 bar requested boost will not go above 4... that's my problem lol.

What?
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #327 on: July 26, 2013, 11:42:11 AM »

Incorrect the KFLDHBN is still limited to a pressure ratio of 4.
So even with a 5 bar requested boost will not go above 4... that's my problem lol.

I'm fully aware of the 3.9844 limitation imposed by KFLDHBN, I was referring to bische's post about the 10k mod.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306


« Reply #328 on: July 26, 2013, 11:44:33 AM »

I'm fully aware of the 3.9844 limitation imposed by KFLDHBN, I was referring to bische's post about the 10k mod.

Fair enough lol yeah 5 bar map sensor is enough...
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #329 on: July 26, 2013, 11:50:37 AM »

Fair enough lol yeah 5 bar map sensor is enough...

I figured as much. 58.8psi is not an insignificant figure. I think to cross that threshold reliably we'll be taking about beryillium pistons, F1 inspired rods and a titanium crank.

What does setting KFLDHBN to 0 do?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 37
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.026 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)