Well, I didnt want to say that but thr car was previosly on dyno, without advanced ignition for lpg. It made 7hp and 15nm less than on gasoline. I think thats a good result for gasoline ignition, considering the fact, that for the same lambda lpg is 6% less to burn than gasoline.
Not my experience, I have had multiple LPG cars on dyno and the difference was much more than 7 hp for me.
I did the first cars with LPG and mapswitching over 10 years ago I think on old 2.2T ecu.
Even if they are, prj used it as a confirmation of what he said.
I did not. I used it as an illustration that LPG burn rate is more susceptible to lambda change than gasoline, nothing else.
But hey, as I said. Do whatever you want. I stopped calibration 2 years ago, it's not relevant for me anymore.
All I can do here is give advice based on my previous experience, which most likely has a sample size that is a magnitude larger than yours, since I did this professionally for a long time.
Thats my 4th car with lpg, previous ones were 1.8t and none of them got valvetrain damaged, even if i made each of them 100-150kkm…
You probably didn't drive them with stock ecu map WOT or the LPG switched to gasoline at WOT.
If you drive 1.8T with stock mapping and especially those that have ATR active at WOT on LPG you will damage the engine.
If you set up KFDZWKG correctly, then that's already 90% of the problem solved, the other thing is limiting ATR target leaner.