Hi!

Well - power is nice, but much of the driveability comes from the proper pedal map (KFPED).
Can't seem to find much discussion on that around here.
You all happy with whatever you've got?

For anything but a drag racer, probably the most important map in the car.

I dislike most of the production maps. In my mind, the pedal angle is an expression of need for power, nothing else. 10% larger pedal (absolute) should give you 10% larger power (relative).  Moreover, the power may increase a little with engine speed (say 10% per 1000 RPM) which gives the car a lighter feel. However, you do not get exactly the same power in the next gear when you shift.

How do you reason when you make your pedal maps?

Cheers

/K

Well, What I'm normally doing is semi linear response in kfped. First I find out idle engine load and that becomes my kfped = 1. Everything else up to kfped = 100 is linearization of this number and 100.

For example at idle I have ~20 load then kfped=1 (lowest number in axis) I set to 20.

KFPED:
0 - 0
1 - 20
20 ..
30 ..
40 ..
50 ..
60 ..
70 ..
80 ..
90 ..
100 - 100

I'm doing this because I want to have full pedal range. And lower than idle load you will not feel, that's why I'm doing linearization from 20 and not 0

I've tried both a linear and stock-type, not sure which I like better.

I know Julex prefer's to linearize his KFPED.

Torque request not load.

KFMIRL converts the torque request to load request.

Yes, and this is why I always favor numbing low end throttle response in my tuned maps. Makes driving around the city a bit more manageable IMO.