Look at MDFAW, specifically DMFABEG again. mifa can not be larger than mimax, ever.

Hmm...something strange going on here. I'm going to try to recreate the conditions in a new log.

At WOT between 2k - 4k RPM there's a handful of records (14 total not all sequential, but same pull) where mifa > mimax. Most of them (10) mifa > mivbeb, but a few (4), mivbeg, mivbeb and mifa are all equal and > mimax.

There was no reaction at all though, ECU couldn't have cared less.

I'm going to bump this. Without the ability to rescale the IOP axis for the increase in IRL (8 bit limitation FTL), how are people with (strong) stage3 cars not getting intervention? Underscaled MAFS? Disabling torque monitoring altogether? It would seem that without the ability to properly scale IOP to reflect changes in IRL actual torque>requested torque which would in turn trigger intervention.

I've begun the task of transferring my work to the K-box with 5 bar support to avoid this, but I'd like to understand the solution.

IOP axis is 16 bit, rlmax_w for mimax_w and rl_w mibas_w.

Rescaling the load axis is not the answer to intervention however.

I don't know if I can explain any better than I did in the post above yours.

You basically need to use KFMIOP to keep mifa and mibas in check (below miszul) under 60% wped without limiting air charge via mifa/mifal.

Log the variables and tweak as needed.

Ask any specific questions you have after reading this post and the one above yours.

The main trigger outside of KFMIOP is dmar_w != 0.

I keep these a bit more up to date

https://github.com/nyetwurk/ME7L/tree/master/ecus

Ok, so I am attempting to tune my KFMIOP. I see that mibas is exceeding miszul in my logs.

Nyet says: "Just always log those 5 things, and if you see that rule violated, look at rlmax and determine where in KFMIOP you are.... and then see if mimax is resulting in an unusually low miszul or an elevated mifa."

I am going to have to assume my miszul is unusally low (not sure what "unusually low" refers to?) since my mifa is in check.

I am seeing an rlmax = ~210-252 where the mibas exceeds miszul which puts me in the 191 and 225 load columns in KFMIOP. RPM is going to be in the 3000 and 3520 rpm rows. So my KFMIOP values of concern are 69.2, 69.9, 76.1, and 77.3.

I have a few questions. I understand the KFMIOP map uses a fit and interpolates the data it needs.

1. Do I need to adjust cells in KFMIOP outside the 4 that I have identified in my IRL/IOP screenshot image? Should I just scale both columns?

2. Reviewing the FR, I see KFMIOP's output miotl1_w multiples by etazwb to become mibas_w. So when I adjust KFMIOP, my goal is to lower mibas so that it is below miszul?