|
prj
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2013, 02:25:45 PM »
|
|
|
Desired load is used for the filling adjuster (FUEDK).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2013, 02:40:08 PM »
|
|
|
Thanks, now I see... Btw PID is completely stock as is turbo (K03). Yet I can't understant why wastegate DC isn't at 95 whenever I press gas pedal 100% and load haven't reached the target?
the PID driven by lde (ld error) not load deviation. Please review the FR :/ "ld" is NOT load.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #17 on: May 17, 2013, 02:51:38 PM »
|
|
|
Desired load is used for the filling adjuster (FUEDK).
I can never tell whether your disagreeing or not, but exactly. Charge control or filling adjuster (FUEDK) as part of load realization (FE). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2013, 02:58:47 PM »
|
|
|
Desired load is used for the filling adjuster (FUEDK).
but actual/desired load deviation does not drive LDRPID :/ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2013, 03:16:20 PM »
|
|
|
I should correct my previous statement.
rlsol is evaluated against rl, but only for calculating throttle angle.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #20 on: May 17, 2013, 03:40:52 PM »
|
|
|
Um, guys, so KFLDRL is there to configure how much wgdc ecu can use on each pid correction? Ie: If duty cycle from PID returns as 10% KDLDRL maps it to whatever RPM/10% cell is? In my case it would be 38% @ 4000 RPM? Right? So basically this maps allows us to configure how fast PID will get to the target pressure? As in step size of corrections?
If we set this whole map to 95% then even smallest wgdc requested from pid will result in 95% and thus fastest achievement of target charge but also sinusoidal PID? Or am I completely wrong on this?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #21 on: May 17, 2013, 06:01:23 PM »
|
|
|
Um, guys, so KFLDRL is there to configure how much wgdc ecu can use on each pid correction? Ie: If duty cycle from PID returns as 10% KDLDRL maps it to whatever RPM/10% cell is? In my case it would be 38% @ 4000 RPM? Right? So basically this maps allows us to configure how fast PID will get to the target pressure? As in step size of corrections?
If we set this whole map to 95% then even smallest wgdc requested from pid will result in 95% and thus fastest achievement of target charge but also sinusoidal PID? Or am I completely wrong on this?
If you aren't already at 95% during spool *even with a stock KFLDRL* you are doing it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #22 on: May 18, 2013, 02:02:15 AM »
|
|
|
I should correct my previous statement.
rlsol is evaluated against rl, but only for calculating throttle angle. That is basically why I said what I said  Specifically because desired/actual does exist, since it subtracts rl from rlsol and that goes into throttle angle set point. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 18, 2013, 02:03:56 AM by prj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brs
Full Member
Karma: +3/-11
 Offline
Posts: 61
|
|
« Reply #23 on: September 13, 2019, 11:56:37 AM »
|
|
|
Hi all,
i know this is old topic but i didn't want open a new topic.
My issue,rlsow_w not ever following to rlmax_w and rlmx_w
rlmx_w seems 254 but rlsol_w seems max ~220 in my logs.
is this a torque intervention? or something else ?
maybe my kp axis wrong (KFMIOP) , i don't know..
KFMIOP
@166DE x-axis@13074 and y-axis@16840 in my .kp
Log and ori attached
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #24 on: September 13, 2019, 12:22:18 PM »
|
|
|
Are you sure that your turbo can make more power? Where is WGDC?
Look at you KFMIRL values, they have smaler value than a LDRXN.
I must go, but tomorow i will explain better
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brs
Full Member
Karma: +3/-11
Offline
Posts: 61
|
|
« Reply #25 on: September 13, 2019, 12:31:07 PM »
|
|
|
Are you sure that your turbo can make more power? Where is WGDC?
Look at you KFMIRL values, they have smaler value than a LDRXN.
I must go, but tomorow i will explain better
Turbo is a gt28 with external wg. checked repeatedly, KFMIRL values they haven't smaler value than a LDRXN |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #26 on: September 13, 2019, 12:52:01 PM »
|
|
|
Turbo is a gt28 with external wg.
checked repeatedly, KFMIRL values they haven't smaler value than a LDRXN
Post a pic of KFMIRL and LDRXN |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brs
Full Member
Karma: +3/-11
Offline
Posts: 61
|
|
« Reply #27 on: September 13, 2019, 12:59:16 PM »
|
|
|
Here
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #28 on: September 13, 2019, 03:39:58 PM »
|
|
|
LDRXN go to KFMIOP, you get "misol"... "misol" go to KFMIRL and values you get after conversion are lover than a LDRXN values
So raise KFMIOP or KFMIRL values at "misol" you get from log
What about your KFLDHBN? Can you log it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brs
Full Member
Karma: +3/-11
Offline
Posts: 61
|
|
« Reply #29 on: September 13, 2019, 03:45:20 PM »
|
|
|
KFLDHBN @1EE7E and all FF
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
