SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 79
|
 |
« on: June 25, 2013, 12:14:26 PM »
|
|
|
1.8T 4bar MAP scaled. More then 2bar boost gtx3071. I have this situation. But I do not understand why ECU cuts requested load. Only with high specified load. If LDRXN a little lower - all is ideal. I want to exceed the regulated threshold of 2 bar.
No ignition retards. Intake temp 32 C at this moment. Good fueling. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 25, 2013, 12:46:23 PM by SeRiLLo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2013, 12:17:51 PM »
|
|
|
You should use RPM as x axis, and put things with very different values (req boost is very different from req load) on different y axes.
that graph is almost unreadable.
I assume KFLDHBN is the first thing you looked at?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2013, 12:20:57 PM »
|
|
|
this is KFMIRL and KFMIOP
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2013, 12:23:59 PM »
|
|
|
You should use RPM as x axis, and put things with very different values (req boost is very different from req load) on different y axes.
that graph is almost unreadable.
I assume KFLDHBN is the first thing you looked at?
i read it like that. Blue an red line. Intake temp 32 C with meth injection this is kfldhbn. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2013, 12:34:06 PM »
|
|
|
You should use RPM as x axis, and put things with very different values (req boost is very different from req load) on different y axes.
that graph is almost unreadable.
image changed in first post |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2013, 02:17:02 PM »
|
|
|
If your tmot is 92C, what do you think the output of KFLDHBN will be?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
B234R
Full Member
Karma: +11/-0
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2013, 02:30:08 PM »
|
|
|
Temperature input should be tsel (tans or tumc), not tmot, on ME7.5.
(Maybe I'm wrong)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2013, 02:32:51 PM »
|
|
|
If your tmot is 92C, what do you think the output of KFLDHBN will be?
KFLDHBN Y-axis is intake temp (tans), not engine tamp. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2013, 02:37:42 PM »
|
|
|
ah my mistake. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2013, 03:04:22 PM »
|
|
|
Torque intervention or KFMIRL is whack
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2013, 03:09:19 PM »
|
|
|
Am I the only one that looked at his IOP?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2013, 01:59:58 AM »
|
|
|
but why after 6000 rpm rlsol_w meet rlmax_w anyway ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2013, 02:05:36 AM »
|
|
|
Am I the only one that looked at his IOP?
you mean X-axis max 200? Do you think it could affect? Then why after 6000 rpm rlsol_w meet rlmax_w anyway ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2013, 03:22:28 AM »
|
|
|
Your IRL and IOP are absolutely ridiculous. Tune them correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SeRiLLo
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2013, 08:11:41 AM »
|
|
|
Your IRL and IOP are absolutely ridiculous. Tune them correctly.
На первый взгляд вроде все не так плохо ) Are you sure? Ok. I`ll try that |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
