Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Preferred method of increasing threshold for positive deviation detection  (Read 18826 times)
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



Big, laggy turbo, trying to numb positive deviation diagnosis. Other than EDLDRP, what are the preferred methods, specifically for ME7.5?

My file is attached.

I'm leaning towards 1A231
« Last Edit: August 18, 2013, 01:10:26 AM by ddillenger » Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW

How different is that file's positive deviation process from the 2.7t?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



So the address I thought might have been it (directly after DLUL) I now believe to be DPLPLGD

Nye: superficially, very different. DLULS is 8x1, with the addition of DLUL (single byte). Also, on the subject of deviation, anyone know the names of the time constants for overboost and underboost detection?
« Last Edit: August 18, 2013, 01:12:57 AM by ddillenger » Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



Anyone?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763



Its at 19A2F in my file I believe.

Schwelle Regelabweichung für Diagnose LDR-Regelabweichung positiv (1x1)

/hPa

      -
      0
-   0    300.0
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



Its at 19A2F in my file I believe.

Schwelle Regelabweichung für Diagnose LDR-Regelabweichung positiv (1x1)

/hPa

      -
      0
-   0    300.0

Acronym? Also, I forget which file's yours.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763



That one above is EDLDRP




This one is @109A1
(TSFLDRA)Fehlersummenzeit: Ladedruckregelabweichung (1x1)

1 : 1 Umrechnug (dez/hex)/

      -
      0
-   0   255.00


out of my 032HS
Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763



19A38 (TDLDRA) Time threshold for Dia LDR - control deviation - Zeitschwelle für Dia LDR - Regelabweichung (1x1)

/s

      -
      0
-   0   3.0000
Logged
Bische
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +25/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 397



WWW

27E8B
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



27E8B

Bische:

That address isn't accurate for the file I posted. That looks like KLDLULS (overboost deviation, which I have at 27F47). I'm not looking to disable overboost diagnosis, but rather underboost.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2013, 01:33:50 AM by ddillenger » Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Bische
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +25/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 397



WWW

Bische:

That address isn't accurate for the file I posted. That looks like KLDLULS (overboost deviation, which I have at 27F47). I'm not looking to disable overboost diagnosis, but rather underboost.

Oh, I misread the SW version #.

But, im not quite sure I follow here. You have set a target boost that cannot be reached, and then you want to disable the diagnosis throwing a code for underboosting?  Smiley

Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



I'm just having issues with underboost codes periodically on part throttle. I have boost following requested perfectly on WOT runs, I'd just like to numb deviation detection a bit so the code doesn't pop up during casual driving.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Bische
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +25/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 397



WWW

I have never had that problem, how big turbo are we talking?

But that would be handled in the map on my screenshot anyway.
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



Bische: I checked the map posted, my file has different values (Factor 5*x).

Also, is the axis right before it? Factor? I assume it's HPA (the axis) not U/Min like I've seen.

DLUL is deviation detection in general, not just for overboost like KFDLULS?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640



So I have the underboost sorted by setting LDRXN to something a bit more reasonable for such a laggy turbo. I'm still getting code P0234 (overboost), mainly when letting off after a run. Looks like the N249 being missing may be the issue here, but I need to eliminate it. I have FF'd KLDLUL (or what I believe to be 27F47, 8x1), and DLUL (1 byte), but still getting the code. Thoughts?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.02 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)