oldcarguy85
Full Member
Karma: +15/-1
 Offline
Posts: 247
|
 |
« on: October 15, 2013, 05:20:22 PM »
|
|
|
Hey all,
I'm using the 032DL xdf from the def file section. The LDRXNZK map in the included OEM map is completely linear. This can't be right, can it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oldcarguy85
Full Member
Karma: +15/-1
Offline
Posts: 247
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2013, 05:22:46 PM »
|
|
|
also, i know this shoudl probably be a seperate topic, but what is the calculation for "max requested pressure ratio?" I realize this needs to be increased, but what do the numbers mean? I know i've read it here before, but i'm having trouble finding it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
k0mpresd
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2013, 05:42:14 PM »
|
|
|
zk is not linear. i would assume your address is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2013, 05:45:15 PM »
|
|
|
LDRXNZK=1EB14
That definition isnt right for that version.
As for KFLDHBN, leave it alone for a K03.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 16, 2013, 06:22:17 PM by ddillenger »
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
oldcarguy85
Full Member
Karma: +15/-1
Offline
Posts: 247
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2013, 06:28:21 PM »
|
|
|
LDRXN=1EAD2
That definition isnt right for that version.
As for KFLDHBN, leave it alone for a K03.
thanks -- LDRXN is correct in the XDF. It's LDRXNZK i'm concerned with. Also, i appreciate the advice with KFLDHBN, but would you mind explaining the meaning of the numbers in the table (i'm just curious). Thanks for all the help! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2013, 06:38:45 PM »
|
|
|
It's a ratio. Basically multiply those numbers by atmospheric, and you have the maximum pressure the ecu will request to meet desired load.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 16, 2013, 06:21:19 PM by ddillenger »
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
k0mpresd
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2013, 08:35:48 PM »
|
|
|
LDRXN=1EAD2 thanks -- LDRXN is correct in the XDF. It's LDRXNZK i'm concerned with. his point was that zk is directly below ldrxn. therefore telling you where ldrxn was located, he also directed you to the location of zk. the definition is wrong. fix it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oldcarguy85
Full Member
Karma: +15/-1
Offline
Posts: 247
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2013, 05:58:53 PM »
|
|
|
his point was that zk is directly below ldrxn. therefore telling you where ldrxn was located, he also directed you to the location of zk.
the definition is wrong. fix it.
Thanks. Had no idea that was it was always below ldrxn. Good to know |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2013, 06:23:15 PM »
|
|
|
Thanks. Had no idea that was it was always below ldrxn. Good to know
Honestly, I missed the ZK part. I edited my original post, but K0mpresd is right, LDRXN is always right above LDRXNZK (leave LDRXNZK alone). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
k0mpresd
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2013, 08:36:44 PM »
|
|
|
lol. well i just assumed tons on that one.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oldcarguy85
Full Member
Karma: +15/-1
Offline
Posts: 247
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2013, 12:58:48 PM »
|
|
|
Thanks everyone -- i fixed the XDF and found correct LDRXNZK. it, as expected, looked like a normal LDRXNZK map.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
