roman_tyk
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 87
|
 |
« on: January 19, 2014, 12:45:53 PM »
|
|
|
I got really strange problem which I have never experienced on any other ECU then BFB/BEX.
Problem exist whenever i want to run only on LAMFA map, values are not taken to the specified lambda.
Of course my KFFDLBTS is = 0 and KFLBTS = 1, in that situation fueling should be based only on LAMFA map, but in practise i still got lean lambda.
Is there any different map which is used for calculating lambda on this ecu?
i would like to turn of egt protection, bts and only run on well prepared lamfa.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2014, 02:26:02 PM »
|
|
|
What do you have for ZKLAMFAW?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
roman_tyk
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 87
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2014, 12:14:17 AM »
|
|
|
I got ZKLAMFAW stock, but as far as i know ZKLAMFAW is delaying the onset of LAMFA not determine specified lambda.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2014, 12:40:02 PM »
|
|
|
What is stock?
ZKLAMFAW is the alpha constant for the low pass filter and controls the rate of change. Enrichment will occur linearly towards the specified value using the rate of change set by ZKLAMFAW and may never even reach the target if the rate of change is low enough.
Do you have LAMFA defined correctly including the axis'?
There isn't a whole lot that can go wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2014, 12:41:51 PM »
|
|
|
I'm having the same problem on an 1.8t 032LP
ZKLAMFAW set to ffff
lamfa doesn't seem to kick in until BTS is triggered.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
roman_tyk
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 87
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2014, 01:12:07 PM »
|
|
|
My lamfa is defined correctly, i performed a lot of tests to check what is wrong but no success  i found KFZKLAMFA's maps at: KFZKLAMFAW_0_A at 26D88 8x6 16-bit KFZKLAMFAW_1_A at 26DE8 8x6 16-bit  Should i set those maps to 65535 ? are maps look ok? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 01:52:53 PM by roman_tyk »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2014, 01:56:05 PM »
|
|
|
TLAFA?
B_lamfas?
What variables can you log from the function? lamfaw_w? lamfaws_w?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
roman_tyk
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 87
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2014, 02:12:53 PM »
|
|
|
I am adding excell with logs from me7logger
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2014, 03:21:52 PM »
|
|
|
TLAFA?
B_lamfas?
What variables can you log from the function? lamfaw_w? lamfaws_w?
ME7L fails to detect a LOT of variables needed to debug this :/ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2014, 09:59:27 PM »
|
|
|
TLAFA
This could be the problem. Stock is 2s On my 2.7t files, stock is already 0 |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 10:07:42 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
roman_tyk
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 87
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2014, 12:16:16 AM »
|
|
|
i tried with TLAFA=0, reaction for actual lambda was faster but original problem still exist (car not running on LAMFA)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2014, 06:31:34 AM »
|
|
|
FF all of ZKLAMFAW.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
roman_tyk
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 87
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2014, 02:43:51 PM »
|
|
|
FF all of ZKLAMFAW.
Setting ZKLAMFAW 8x6 maps to FF solved the problem. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2014, 03:57:29 PM »
|
|
|
You can set them to something a bit lower than ffff to make it look a bit smoother... instead of a cliff...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kacza
Full Member
Karma: +20/-6
Offline
Posts: 213
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2016, 03:52:57 AM »
|
|
|
Hello. I looking TLAFA for ECU 8E0909518AQ 0010.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
