Kacza
Full Member
Karma: +20/-7
 Offline
Posts: 216
|
 |
« Reply #360 on: March 06, 2018, 03:35:36 AM »
|
|
|
Can someone say what is in this area?
I have 2 files with the same SW and HW, and this area is different.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lepatron972
Full Member
Karma: +3/-17
Offline
Posts: 92
|
|
« Reply #361 on: March 06, 2018, 03:37:54 AM »
|
|
|
6c00 is the immo area
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk Pro
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
lepatron972
|
|
|
Kacza
Full Member
Karma: +20/-7
Offline
Posts: 216
|
|
« Reply #362 on: March 06, 2018, 05:29:39 AM »
|
|
|
IMMO in flash memory?
I always thought MED9 was just like EDC16. That they IMMO have in mind the eeprom.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #363 on: March 06, 2018, 05:57:29 AM »
|
|
|
search the forum for 6c00 6fff and you will find more about this
do we know what is stored in this immo block?
is there a way to rebuild the immo block in the flash based on the eeprom file?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #364 on: March 08, 2018, 10:39:51 AM »
|
|
|
Is there something like me7check for med9?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MyTunes
Full Member
Karma: +9/-5
Offline
Posts: 83
|
|
« Reply #365 on: October 20, 2018, 07:07:06 PM »
|
|
|
Is there something like me7check for med9?
Yes, the late daz aka ddellinger has a post with med9 check that he and someone else made (sorry other person can't remember off the top of my head) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
andrax
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #366 on: July 07, 2019, 08:50:48 AM »
|
|
|
Hello All,
I have something strange happening to me.
Car is an A6 2.0 TFSI 170hp ECU 0261S02291 w/ 386852
After changing the basic maps, I got correct boost values but engine load is not reaching the requested values.
Boost pressure is about 1.15bar but the specified engine load (175) is not reached and only goes to 155.
I thought both values were correlated since we are aiming for engine load which is achieved through boost.
Changed were KFMIRL, KFMIOP, LDRXN, LDPBN and KFLDHBN.
I also found KFMIOPS (at least I thing is the right one) but since I haven´t found KFMIRLS on this software I left it stock. Can this be the reason for limited load?
Can someone confirm if this version has KFMIRLS?
Any thoughts on this behaviour?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
andrax
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #367 on: July 07, 2019, 01:17:28 PM »
|
|
|
Can also anyone help me to find CWSAWE? I thought it was on 1C5758 but it is only working with clutch which proves this is the wrong address
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #368 on: September 25, 2019, 11:43:26 PM »
|
|
|
When trying to clone older med9 ecu to newer med9 i stumbled over different eeprom sizes.
The 8kb files contain 4 times the same information so it is 4x2kb blocks.
Will the car work with the new ecu if i only add 4 times the old 2kb eeprom content or is the whole structure of the eeprom content different?
Right now i dont have a car to try.
AXX or semething
MPC Family : MPC562 ( 0x35200800.1ff - int.flash 0B )
Ext. Flash : M58BW016D(F)T ( 0x208835 - ext.flash 2MB )
Ext.Eeprom: 95160 SPI ( 2kB ).
BTW A4 newer TFSI
MPC Family : MPC562 ( 0x35200800.1ff - int.flash 0B )
Ext. Flash : M58BW016D(F)T ( 0x208835 - ext.flash 2MB )
Ext.Eeprom: 95640 SPI ( 8kB ).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
1 6 D
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 1
|
|
« Reply #369 on: August 24, 2021, 01:48:00 PM »
|
|
|
Hi,
Does somebody know how in Passat R36 MED9.1 could be turnd off using of electric handbrake? After swap to Eos there is error with no connection to J540.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
agron25
Full Member
Karma: +1/-19
Offline
Posts: 65
|
|
« Reply #370 on: June 19, 2022, 09:20:47 AM »
|
|
|
hello
I am looking for the krkate address for
SW 1037386675
hw 0261S02113
thank
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 19, 2022, 09:52:40 AM by agron25 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nitefly
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-6
Offline
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #371 on: August 30, 2023, 10:41:23 PM »
|
|
|
Hello
I am working on my tuned file. I have the golf mk5 GTI Edition 30 engine (BYD) and I am comparing data from that(1k0907115L) to the data from the Audi S3, BHZ engine.
Question, both data having 3 different KFZW and 3 different KFZW2 maps. Variant 1 and 3 on both KFZW and KFZW2 are the same but data variant 2 on both KFZW and KFZW are different, they share not the same data (edition 30 vs S3). The second variant KFZW and KFZW2 maps from thr Audi S3 have more advanced ignition i noticed compared to the GTI Edition30.
Why does the second variant of KFZW amd KFZW between those two engines differ?
According to the FR (if i understood it correct) the difference between KFZW and KFZW2 is when intake runnerflaps are used or not, is this correct??
Another question, since i plan to run an maximum of ~190 in load, how well are the ignition angles in the KFZW and KFZW2 maps along the 190 load y-axis? Do the need to be adjusted? What have you guys done?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #372 on: August 30, 2023, 11:01:05 PM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nitefly
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-6
Offline
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #373 on: August 31, 2023, 12:35:45 AM »
|
|
|
thank you.
How about those stock ignition values for higher load, like the last row of 190 in load? Can one trust them or do the need to be adjusted?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #374 on: August 31, 2023, 02:27:22 AM »
|
|
|
too much theory, too less logging  just log your car and check the ignition retard. if there is no retard you can advance the timing |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
