|
nyet
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: September 16, 2014, 05:02:04 PM »
|
|
|
That make sense, thanks. So, in the non probably case that I'm getting 50 units smaller actual load than requested, doesn't really matter if my actual boost matches requested boost?
Yep. Do you think my "shitty" first remap is ok? or I was right when I said is too rich and it's too much load to the engine to pruduce?
Don't have time to dig through somebody's tune. Much rather look at their logs  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
 Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #46 on: September 16, 2014, 05:07:59 PM »
|
|
|
Don't have time to dig through somebody's tune. Much rather look at their logs That's logic mate, I mean only looking at my logs. All of you are doing a great job giving help. So if you (as community, not only you) give me your opinion, when you can and want to, looking at the logs is far enough and I'm gratefull for that |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 05:09:47 PM by diegogpb »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #47 on: September 16, 2014, 05:11:01 PM »
|
|
|
Of course! Post ME7Logger csvs and I would be happy to take a look.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #48 on: October 20, 2014, 03:30:22 PM »
|
|
|
Hi mates
My HexWorkshop has expired and I'm about to get a new hexadecimal editor... What do you guys use? (Ones that haven't purchased WinOLS)
HexWorkshop can flip bytes, but can't (At least I don't know how to) show the values in decimal. Is there any well oriented editor to me7 tuning?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #49 on: October 20, 2014, 03:46:21 PM »
|
|
|
Hi mates
My HexWorkshop has expired and I'm about to get a new hexadecimal editor... What do you guys use? (Ones that haven't purchased WinOLS)
HexWorkshop can flip bytes, but can't (At least I don't know how to) show the values in decimal. Is there any well oriented editor to me7 tuning?
You mean other than tuner pro? I haven't really found a free windows hex editor I like yet .. I use bvi on linux but it is super lightweight and doesn't have a lot of features. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #50 on: October 30, 2014, 06:38:19 PM »
|
|
|
Hi mates I'm about to correct kflbts and zero kffdlbts to control lambdas at wot via only kflbts. I'm making myself a XDF for tunerpro, and as I'm already working I decided to touch a couple of things more: a)Ignition timing (I'm in Europe, Spain... I say this for the petrol quality) b)Limitations in boost a) I'm looking for it in s4wiki but the only I found in relation with timing is vvt... and I want to tune Ignition timing: Coud any one tell me which are these maps? Does any other thing than knocking intervene in timing? (eg: egt, intake temp...). Just for adding info, With my current remap I'm getting 0 ignition retardation and with 95 octane petrol, but I think the advance angle is quite low (15-18 degrees when WOT@6000-6500rpm). What do you think? b) Apart from ldrxn and ldrxnzk... KFLDHBN limitation in altitude (temperature). I see values like 2100, 1900. I don't really know if it's absolute boost pressure or relative. If it's absolute it's limitating me. Should I rise it? should I FF it? Does any other map limit boost? Ps: If you want my XDF just tell me and I'll upload it, but I recon there are better ones and mine is in spanish  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 30, 2014, 06:49:24 PM by diegogpb »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #51 on: October 30, 2014, 10:32:30 PM »
|
|
|
a) I'm looking for it in s4wiki but the only I found in relation with timing is vvt... and I want to tune Ignition timing:
KFZW and KFZW2 are the timing tables. Please consult the FR. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #52 on: November 01, 2014, 09:51:19 AM »
|
|
|
KFZW and KFZW2 are the timing tables. Please consult the FR.
I read it wrong, s4wiki says kfzw/kfzw2 depending on vvt activation, but are ignition timing base maps. Tanks nyet |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #53 on: November 01, 2014, 11:02:36 AM »
|
|
|
I read it wrong, s4wiki says kfzw/kfzw2 depending on vvt activation, but are ignition timing base maps. Tanks nyet No problem. I will try to clarify the wiki page. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #54 on: November 03, 2014, 12:46:55 PM »
|
|
|
I've put all 0 in KFFDLBTS to ensure requested lambda is only managed by KFLBTS once exceeded EGT threshold. Tuned KFLBTS like this  Having in ming my reached load, do you think it's OK? Is it "safe"? I'm open to opinions and advices Ps: It's not flashed to the car yet, only modified in my PC. Notice that stock KFLBTS has lambdas bigger than 1 in several areas... I've put it to 1 even knowing that the ECU always selects the richest option between LAMFA and KFLBTS. But I'm more comfortable this way. Is it OK? In essence, where Lambdas were bigger than 1, I set it to 1, where Lambdas were smaller than 0.83, set it to 0.83-0.82 |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 03, 2014, 01:22:26 PM by diegogpb »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #55 on: November 03, 2014, 12:58:37 PM »
|
|
|
One more thing:
I've read in ecuconnections that setting a cell to 1 disables that cell. Setting a map to 1, dissables that map.
I don't think so, I think It depends on different algorythms and each map is disabled one way in order to make no effect via this algorythm. Not just Bosch saying: In every situation, a 1 = disable.
Can anyone confirm who is right/wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #56 on: November 03, 2014, 01:09:01 PM »
|
|
|
Absolutely untrue that "1" disables anything.
For a map that is used as a multiplicative correction factor (KF), 1 simply means no correction, which is the same as "disabled", I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #57 on: November 03, 2014, 01:18:15 PM »
|
|
|
Absolutely untrue that "1" disables anything.
For a map that is used as a multiplicative correction factor (KF), 1 simply means no correction, which is the same as "disabled", I suppose.
That's exactly what I was thinking. Didn't know KF means multiplicative correction, that makes sense jaja What do you think about my KFLBTS nyet? I really have your oppinion in mind Ps: me7sum works like charm, lots of thanks and congratulations |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dgpb
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 176
|
|
« Reply #58 on: November 04, 2014, 03:27:02 AM »
|
|
|
I've put all 0 in KFFDLBTS to ensure requested lambda is only managed by KFLBTS once exceeded EGT threshold. Tuned KFLBTS like this Having in ming my reached load, do you think it's OK? Is it "safe"? I'm open to opinions and advices Ps: It's not flashed to the car yet, only modified in my PC. Notice that stock KFLBTS has lambdas bigger than 1 in several areas... I've put it to 1 even knowing that the ECU always selects the richest option between LAMFA and KFLBTS. But I'm more comfortable this way. Is it OK? In essence, where Lambdas were bigger than 1, I set it to 1, where Lambdas were smaller than 0.83, set it to 0.83-0.82 Any oppinions mates? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
adam-
|
|
« Reply #59 on: November 04, 2014, 04:54:34 AM »
|
|
|
I'd modify the axis if it were me. There's no resolution under higher loads..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
