dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
 Offline
Posts: 118
|
 |
« Reply #660 on: November 07, 2016, 08:54:40 AM »
|
|
|
Hey all,
- Changed LAMFA to look more like the table in this thread
- Increased LDRXN
Now:
- Fueling looks weird now.
- Boost isn't following LDRXN. Looks stock actually suspect it's KFMIOP/KFMIRL
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #661 on: November 07, 2016, 11:34:21 AM »
|
|
|
- Boost isn't following LDRXN. Looks stock actually suspect it's KFMIOP/KFMIRL
No, IRL looks fine. IOP will limit timing, not boost request. possibly HBN? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #662 on: November 07, 2016, 11:50:07 AM »
|
|
|
No, IRL looks fine. IOP will limit timing, not boost request.
possibly HBN?
Actually i take that back. by 70% mrfa in IRL you should be requesting a lot more load |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #663 on: November 08, 2016, 12:32:40 PM »
|
|
|
The log I've attached isn't good, but from what I see requested load is still following stock. I've modified IRL and IOP to match this current bin.
EDIT:
Intake air temperatures are high, ambient is like 23 C
I also have a vehicle speed sensor error. Hope that doesn't make the ECU behave different
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 08, 2016, 12:37:46 PM by dokalanyi »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #664 on: November 08, 2016, 12:37:34 PM »
|
|
|
Your misol still looks very low. Don't forget rlmax->IOP will limit mrfa that goes into KFMIRL
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #665 on: November 08, 2016, 01:01:19 PM »
|
|
|
I don't quite follow, let's take 3000rpm.
LDRXN = 153
Through IOP, Extrapolating in the 3000 rpm column last 2 rows:
(77+99)/2 = 88 Torque % request to IRL
IRL: Between 160 and 183, so I'd think it's requesting enough load.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #666 on: November 08, 2016, 11:50:13 PM »
|
|
|
On second thought, I think it's following LDRXNZK, because there is lots of knock happening. I'm using what I think is the best fuel available -- Shell V Power.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #667 on: November 09, 2016, 12:00:14 AM »
|
|
|
mifa is CRAZY low though.
Any chance you can log mrfa?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #668 on: November 09, 2016, 01:33:21 AM »
|
|
|
Alright, going to flash and log the attached values from BAM ECU. With mrfa logged
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #669 on: November 09, 2016, 01:39:12 AM »
|
|
|
Hadn't copied over IRL.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #670 on: November 09, 2016, 09:01:53 AM »
|
|
|
I logged twice today. I'll split into two posts for easy separation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #671 on: November 09, 2016, 09:07:59 AM »
|
|
|
I tried to log again, which I couldn't complete, but I saw the trend was the same so didn't try to get the full log. I made IOP aggressive (or so I thought)
Boost is still following stock. I suspect it's following LDRXNZK, but I don't want to change LDRXNZK, since it's a safety measure.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #672 on: November 09, 2016, 11:40:39 AM »
|
|
|
Yea, I'd say IRL and IP look fine, the problem is definitely rlmax.
I don't get why it would be following LDRXNZK, you aren't seeing much ignition retard at all.
Not sure which file or mappack you are using, but is it possible you are modifying the wrong LDRXN? Many have more than one (not just also LDRXNZK)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dokalanyi
Full Member
Karma: +4/-1
Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #673 on: November 09, 2016, 11:50:09 AM »
|
|
|
I'm using and xdf and kp I found here. I've attached.
Also, I'm seeing ignition retard of up to -6 degrees. Unless I'm reading the log. Most other logs on the forum have 0. That's why I thought there was knock and retard. If you say there is barely any, I'm going to modify LDRXNZK and test the theory.
I made the XDF based on the .kp. I found it on here somewhere.
I'll match LDRXN and LDRXNZK tomorrow and log.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #674 on: November 09, 2016, 12:03:19 PM »
|
|
|
If you say there is barely any, I'm going to modify LDRXNZK and test the theory.
That seems entirely reasonable. You should be fine for testing. That said, at those boost levels you shouldn't be seeing that much knock.. so at some point that does have to be addressed. You might want to add some fuel to be extra safe. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 09, 2016, 12:06:03 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
