Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Author Topic: Boost builds slow log inside  (Read 26923 times)
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2014, 02:07:44 PM »

huh , lol p result zero . not sure what you mean
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2014, 02:08:48 PM »

Exactly. Why are you using a tune you don't know anything about?

Please, do not try to fix other people's tunes. Do some research and do it yourself from scratch. Make sure you know what EVERY change does.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2014, 02:47:47 PM »

im not using a tune i don't know anything about , i don't know a whole lot about tuning either. That's why i'm here .
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2014, 02:50:11 PM »

im not using a tune i don't know anything about

Go through each map changed and explain what they each do, why they need to be changed, and what the changes are meant to do.

Once you do that, you'll know what is wrong with the PID output..
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2014, 05:30:18 PM »

ive been trying , i just found what you were talking about in the log. That log was from a friend using me7logger . i have been using visualme7logger and using the mark-p.cfg file.I dont have those logged when im doing my logs.

I don't know what the p-result should look like either. ive been using a stock map , a stage 2 map (currently on my stg 2 car and running great) and tony's stg 3 map  for references.
seeing what was changed and trying to go from there. I dont have a computer backround which it seems like alot of you do , hands on learner over here
Logged
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2014, 11:32:51 PM »

I'm going to set all my boost maps back to stock and start over. My fueling is pretty spot on right now from what I can tell (wideband) and e85 timing map is good so far - haven't pushed it to much . kinda stopped when I tried to get boost under control .
Logged
sweegie
Full Member
***

Karma: +10/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2014, 07:44:34 AM »

Good stuff. Get the car running right at std pressure levels using e85. Once youre happy, move onto the pid controller for the n75 in conjunction with upping requested load.
Logged
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2014, 08:08:04 AM »

that's the plan now. only problem is i've read the boost portion of the tuning wiki many times and not gettnig anywhere Smiley maybe the 20th time ill get it
Logged
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2014, 08:55:29 AM »

for k04's the rs4 map has a better base correct . If i went through and swapped over ll the rs4 boost maps would that work for a better place to start?
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +638/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2014, 08:56:56 AM »

for k04's the rs4 map has a better base correct . If i went through and swapped over ll the rs4 boost maps would that work for a better place to start?

No. RS4 uses different PID control.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2014, 11:30:54 AM »

got it . well time to start over  , thanks
Logged
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #26 on: December 24, 2014, 05:19:31 PM »

ok so everything was set back to stock and im starting my changes

http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=1375.0
using berTTos kfmiop tool i changed my kfmirl and kfmiop - so load and optimal torque map have been changed

http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=6765.0
and using what ddillinger said here i changed the axis of my kfmiop map accordingly

So now i need a ldrxn for k04's , this isn't my daily so aggressive is cool . How is this looking so far ? Where should i go next
Logged
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2014, 05:37:36 PM »

? should i flash and lag ? or is there something else i need to do first that im missing
Logged
sweegie
Full Member
***

Karma: +10/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #28 on: December 26, 2014, 07:48:56 PM »

you will not hit 229 load at 1500 rpm... start with scaling a stock profile, then analyse the logs and see where you can ask for more. you need to use realistic values here....
Logged
tnel20
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #29 on: December 26, 2014, 08:30:45 PM »

finding good boost profile imags isnt easy they are mostly of crap lol , ill go through my most recent log and try to match it
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.021 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)