Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
Author Topic: ME7.5 differences from ME7.1  (Read 92235 times)
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #60 on: October 04, 2011, 11:28:09 AM »

I am seeing your req AFR is almost always lambda 1? That can't be right.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #61 on: October 04, 2011, 02:28:57 PM »

Also, I think you need to recheck your wastegate and N75 - you should have no trouble holding 20psi to redline.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
rayce
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


« Reply #62 on: October 05, 2011, 08:40:20 PM »

I am seeing your req AFR is almost always lambda 1? That can't be right.

Stock LAMFA image...
Logged

04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
rayce
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


« Reply #63 on: October 05, 2011, 08:55:16 PM »

Also, I think you need to recheck your wastegate and N75 - you should have no trouble holding 20psi to redline.

Please tell me you have a log of a K04 showing higher than mine. If you see a few replies back, I've been over every part of my car and even purchased a new N75 that was supposed to be an updated part. Pressure tested from metal elbow to throttle body and waste gate spring is fine. No leaks and different N75 as well as bypassing ECU control of my BOV and went straight to intake manifold. I even completely disabled the waste gate which gave 100% boost and map is still the same. I’ve been smoothing it out by working on timing which led to scaling the MAF as I stated before.
There is supposed to be I believe three different K04 models. If I knew for shure that it is suppost to hold higher boost, I would replace it but I can't justify replacing such an expensive part if It won't help.
 
Logged

04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #64 on: October 05, 2011, 09:25:05 PM »

Why is one of your axis' messed up in LAMFA?

Also, i'll try to get you a 1.8t log. I don't tune 1.8t, but I know few guys who do, and they all tell me 20psi should be no problem.

ETA: Turns out, I'm wrong. I guess that is expected for your setup...

So, lets forget about boost for a moment, and fix your fueling Smiley

BTW you might want to lower rlmax if you are on the ragged edge of your turbos.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2011, 02:51:23 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
rayce
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


« Reply #65 on: October 06, 2011, 04:31:39 PM »

The whole map is 1.0001 except for that edge which was .98. I made an edit to bring it down to .86. I felt it was too high at max load.

I know there may be a chance of damaging the turbo but isn't it the same as lower boost but higher rpm? E.g max the boost but stock rpm = bad same as lower boost but 1k more rpm
« Last Edit: October 06, 2011, 04:44:51 PM by rayce » Logged

04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #66 on: October 06, 2011, 04:35:29 PM »

No, your axis data is screwed up.

I can't really make it out because whatever you used to resize the photo really fucked up badly.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
rayce
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


« Reply #67 on: October 06, 2011, 05:09:57 PM »

The .csv logs are in the zip, I can send you the link to download ECUxPLOT if you need it.;-)
Logged

04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #68 on: October 06, 2011, 05:56:17 PM »

No, i mean your LAMFA table axis values in WinOLS.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
rayce
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


« Reply #69 on: October 06, 2011, 09:06:43 PM »

No, i mean your LAMFA table axis values in WinOLS.

Here is my LAMFA and the damos to compare...
Logged

04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #70 on: October 06, 2011, 11:03:18 PM »

Look at the last row. its '0' on one. I can't see the other, you have a up over it.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
rayce
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


« Reply #71 on: October 07, 2011, 07:36:10 PM »

They both have zero, I'm not sure if the distribution points are correct, I can shift them one digit hex and get a much better range but the damos is the same. I agree, they don't make sense like this but I copied the damos regarding the locations which is basically saying if mine is wrong, so is the damos.
X Distribution Points Range Shifted is: 50, 60, 90, 95, 98, 100 with 50 in the place of the zero you noticed.
Logged

04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +613/-171
Offline Offline

Posts: 12354


WWW
« Reply #72 on: October 08, 2011, 09:50:22 AM »

if mine is wrong, so is the damos.

Damos files often have many, many errors.

In any case, you'll need to figure out why your req afr isn't following lamfa..
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
rob.mwpropane
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +32/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 370


WWW
« Reply #73 on: October 09, 2011, 04:59:09 AM »

if mine is wrong, so is the damos.

Damos files often have many, many errors.


Most of the Damos files that I have have something messed up in them. I don't think I've ran across one yet that hasn't, at least not for a 1.8t. At first I thought maybe it's just different in some, but no, some are just plain off. I try to open a few at a time to look at. Just my 2 cents.
Logged

This has nothing to do with cars but you can see my glorifying job at,

www.MWPropane.com
Giannis
Full Member
***

Karma: +11/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 176


« Reply #74 on: October 14, 2011, 11:38:15 PM »

try to double click the load axis of LAMFA to go into its properties and change from 16bit(LoHi) to 16bit(HiLo) then the load axis of the map will be ok  Wink
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.044 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)