Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: [FIXED] RS6 C5 crazy boost overshoot and oscillations, mechanical?  (Read 14717 times)
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400



Hey everyone! I need some collective wisdom here, been having all sorts of trouble with this particular car.

This is not the same car I posted here about. Smiley
This one is basically stock, but is also converted to MT.
The main issue is: it just won't control the boost correctly. It overshoots to the point of throttle cut, then tries to recover and so on.

I uploaded the bone stock binary just to see how it behaves at stock boost levels, and guess what - control is still out of whack. Log and ecuxplot attached.

2 main questions:
a) What can be at fault? We tried multiple different N75s to no extent, pressure tested, etc. Everything seems to behave normal, actuator arms move, etc. The only guess that remains now - that actuator arms are actually out of adjustment. Do the symptoms line up with that assumption?
b) How to deal with it? I mean - if it's indeed actuator arms, re-adjusting them with engine installed is almost impossible. So, can this be dealt with by re-calibrating PID? I mean, I obviously can lower the DIMX across the board to follow my requested boost level, increase Q2 etc. Or should I rather re-adjust KFLDRL? Or is it "proper" to re-calibrate whole PID like it's outlined in the according thread?

Where to dig, what to do with this beast? Some input would be awesome! Thanks!

EDIT: noticed that my ecuxplot screenshot has two purple lines - and I can't find the button to edit attachments. Anyways, the one at 100% is wdkba, and the one below is n75.
EDIT2: Modified the title to note that the problem is mostly resolved. Wastegate actuators out of sync.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2016, 11:49:03 PM by nubcake » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2015, 02:56:27 PM »

Easiest solution would be to bring up req load to around 140-150 and see what happens.

Not an RS6 expert though, so take with a grain of salt.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2015, 03:10:29 PM »

Well, that's where I started.
It still overshoots like crazy, to the point of throttle cut. My ecuxplot is still misbehaving, but in the second (TC) graph, the car is actually modulating boost by the throttle plate while n75 stays ~constant. I can fetch logs if that'll help with diagnosis. Basically, the similarity between behavior with stock and increased LDRXN had led me to the belief that it's rather a hardware issue.

Note, in this case, the tune already has DIMX lowered and Q2 increased. Only ~10-15% for both though, not much. Just tried to see if there will be any effect - and these slight changes didn't seem to matter much. Next step would be setting KFLDRAPP to zeros and seeing how it runs on just the WG cans, I guess.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2015, 03:59:41 PM by nubcake » Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2015, 03:12:48 PM »

That boost drop/then upturn around 5000 is KFPRG/URL. They are a mess from the factory. Appear to be the result of day drinking. The rest, you need to spend some time and properly calibrate the boost PID.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2015, 03:22:22 PM »

That boost drop/then upturn around 5000 is KFPRG/URL. They are a mess from the factory. Appear to be the result of day drinking. The rest, you need to spend some time and properly calibrate the boost PID.

Roger. Thanks!
Just thought it was quite weird to see that behavior with stock tune as well. But I'll just dig into PID then. Smiley
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2015, 03:49:20 PM »

Just thought it was quite weird to see that behavior with stock tune as well.

This. Not sure how common it is but it is somewhat odd, unless one of the wastegates are stuck closed.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2015, 04:04:58 PM »

This. Not sure how common it is but it is somewhat odd, unless one of the wastegates are stuck closed.

Actuator arms seem to move in sync when control line is pressurized. But, what actually happens inside the turbo, obviously remains unseen. I guess I'll just do the CWMDAPP=8/KFLDRAPP=0 test, to see what's happening without the N75. I'll update the thread with results.
Logged
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2015, 04:28:58 PM »

Actually now when you mention this, it all falls into place. You are 100% correct. I don't even have to test anything. It had always puzzled me - why did one MAF show higher readings than the second one. This is why. It had always stared me right in the face and I decided to ignore that fact. It wasn't that bad with tunes that requested a lot of boost (it was off by ~10-15%), but is extremely noticeable with the stock one. According to the graph, it appears to be WAY out of adjustment (Or maybe even stuck? But it appears to still respond to the control). Now I just need to figure which one it is.  Grin

Thanks and case closed.

Check this out:
« Last Edit: December 22, 2015, 04:45:53 PM by nubcake » Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2015, 05:12:17 PM »

Do your mafs match? Always replace in pairs. You can run the sensors out of any 2001+ wideband 1.8t as they are identical, just use the RS housings.

As for the boost, I didn't realize this was stock. Yes, something is not right. They don't behave this way stock.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2015, 05:24:31 PM »

Do your mafs match? Always replace in pairs. You can run the sensors out of any 2001+ wideband 1.8t as they are identical, just use the RS housings.

As for the boost, I didn't realize this was stock. Yes, something is not right. They don't behave this way stock.

No-no-no, MAFs themselves are perfectly fine. It just shows that one turbo behaves as expected and the other one spins out of control increasing the MAF readings on that side. Smiley
By the way, 955 cayenne turbo has the same MAFs as well, same housings and same MLHFM curve. The only difference is - cay ones have an aux temp sensor.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2015, 05:28:27 PM by nubcake » Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #10 on: December 22, 2015, 07:16:04 PM »

No-no-no, MAFs themselves are perfectly fine.

You say that, but if you swap them side to side are the readings identical?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #11 on: December 22, 2015, 08:35:46 PM »

Does the RS6 have independent wastegate lines?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2015, 11:26:22 PM »

Does the RS6 have independent wastegate lines?

One reference line from drivers side turbo, single N75 control T'ed to WGs.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2015, 11:40:19 PM by nubcake » Logged
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +124/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2179


« Reply #13 on: December 23, 2015, 01:31:41 AM »

So the wastegates should move identically to each other, and hence make exactly the same boost as each other?  (In theory!).

But, they're not?  Actuator adjustment?  Surely messing with software is only going to mess with the other turbo, rather than fixing the hardware issue?  Or did I miss something?
Logged
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #14 on: December 23, 2015, 03:38:00 AM »

So the wastegates should move identically to each other, and hence make exactly the same boost as each other?  (In theory!).

But, they're not?  Actuator adjustment?  Surely messing with software is only going to mess with the other turbo, rather than fixing the hardware issue?  Or did I miss something?

At this moment, I'm not 100% sure on what is the final cause. I have a strong feeling that this might be a heavily pinched boost control line to the "MAF2" turbo. Gonna re-test it.
"Fixing" it with software changes is out of question unfortunately, yeah.

Run with N75 electrically disconnected:
« Last Edit: December 23, 2015, 09:22:07 AM by nubcake » Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)