Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FPR and KRKTE  (Read 7765 times)
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367


« on: February 08, 2016, 11:33:11 AM »

Ultra noob question here.

1.8t AWP me7.5

Have 3 bar FPR, changing to 4 bar

If injector on time = ('roughly') Load*KRKTE*req_lambda

I would lower KRKTE correct? it's currently something like .11564...some numbers, I don't remember. .11 is correct though, ms/%
How much would I lower it by? What do you gauge this scale by? (difference of amount to dial back for 4 bar as opposed to 5 bar) I assume when logging, I would change this and check injector on time and IDC. Anything else?

When upgrading FPR, does anything else need to be changed other than KRKTE?

sorry if this is a repetitive question that every noob asks.... Cry

Logged
fknbrkn
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +185/-21
Online Online

Posts: 1450


mk4 1.8T AUM


« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2016, 11:36:59 AM »

krkte & kvb
iirc 0.0854 & 341
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12256


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2016, 11:37:50 AM »

krkte * 3/4

Did you bother reading the s4wiki page?

http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Fuel_injectors

And the tuning page

http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning#Primary

which links here
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,320.msg6774.html#msg6774

which says:
KRKTE = 50.2624*(Liters/Cylinder)/(operating flow rate in cc/min * .684 constant )
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 11:41:14 AM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367


« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2016, 11:49:12 AM »

Whoa, alright, I didn't know about the first and last pages, I didn't know they existed. my bad.

2nd link: I did know about that one but I wasn't sure if it applied from a 2.7t to a 1.8t and I also didn't really understand how to convert ms/% to cc/min. wasn't sure if it was cc/min/%.....
The info kinda tripped me up.

Yea i dunno, I guess my ability to find this information is pretty sub par. I'm tryin' here. I'll read all that info. my bad dudes.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 11:57:02 AM by golfputtputt » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12256


WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2016, 12:09:59 PM »

convert ms/% to cc/min

If you are good at dimensional analysis you can do this from first principles.

ms->min is easy.

1 minute = 60 * 1000 milliseconds.

100% = 100% load  = how much fuel to go with one cylinder full of air at STP.. so figure out how much air mass is in a full cyl of air at STP, then divide by 14.7 etc... in grams. Then convert that to cc (density of gasoline).

I would go through the whole calc but if you are bored you can try for it.

converting cc/min to different values based on spec pressure vs actual fuel pressure is covered in the injector page.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367


« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2016, 11:32:08 AM »

Did the calculations and am posting here mainly to show ya'll that I'm not dumb  Tongue

found info on my injectors and needed to scale the flow up for 4 bar FPR. I'm sure others have posted this before but whatever. If anyone else has these injectors:

2002-2004 AWP 180 317cc 3bar 06A 906 031 BA 0 280 156 061 EV6

using equation from s4wiki:

365.925=(√(58.0/43.5))*316.9

316.9cc @ 3 bar
365.9cc @ 4 bar

50.2624*0.4452/ (317*.684)=
50.2624*0.4452/ 216.828=
22.3768205/ 216.828=
.10320079 - old KRKTE (.10301 in bin)

50.2624*0.4452/ (365.9*.684)=
50.2624*0.4452/ 250.2756=
22.37682048/ 250.2756=
.0894087177 - new KRKTE

someone confirm my math?

Also, not sure if anyone has this document for ev12 and 6 injectors but info for EV12s and 6s are not on the wiki (not sure if they pertain to s4's) attached.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 12:54:13 PM by golfputtputt » Logged
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +116/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2016, 02:27:11 PM »

lots of people over-complicate this.  Here's my approach.

1) find your increase in flow due to new injectors or FPR

1 - (316.9 / 365.9) = .134 flow increase

2) subtract from current constant based on flow increase

.10329978 - (.10329978 * .134) = .089458

That should get you darn close.  Go for a drive and note the partial load LTFT afterward.  Increase or decrease KRKTE based on LTFT.  Rinse and repeat in needed.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 02:31:26 PM by SB_GLI » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12256


WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2016, 02:45:26 PM »

lots of people over-complicate this.  Here's my approach.

1) find your increase in flow due to new injectors or FPR

1 - (316.9 / 365.9) = .134 flow increase

2) subtract from current constant based on flow increase

.10329978 - (.10329978 * .134) = .089458

That should get you darn close.  Go for a drive and note the partial load LTFT afterward.  Increase or decrease KRKTE based on LTFT.  Rinse and repeat in needed.

x - (x * (1 - k)) = x*k

You can just .10329978 * (316.9/365.9) dude.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +116/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2016, 05:45:42 PM »

hooray math  Grin
Logged
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367


« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2016, 10:44:06 AM »

how sensitive is this?
to the
.00000 degree?
.0000 degree?
.000 degree?
.00 degree?
.0 degree?

meaning, at what placement should I begin my adjustments if needed?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2016, 10:45:56 AM by golfputtputt » Logged
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +116/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2016, 12:57:19 PM »

thousandths
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12256


WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2016, 07:00:50 PM »

how sensitive is this?
to the
.00000 degree?
.0000 degree?
.000 degree?
.00 degree?
.0 degree?

meaning, at what placement should I begin my adjustments if needed?

Generally, 3 or 4 sig figs.

So
XXXX
XXX.X
XX.XX
X.XXX
0.XXXX
0.0XXXX
0.00XXXX

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_figures
« Last Edit: February 10, 2016, 07:02:57 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12256


WWW
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2016, 07:03:38 PM »

thousandths

at 0.0XX that is only 2 sigfigs... not good enough, IMO.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.022 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)