NefMoto

Hey guys,

Well after about a month of intensive learning from this site and the wiki, I've mapped my bin and (I think) I have a basic understanding to perform some mild adjustments in line with a stage 1 tune.

My post is to confirm I have correctly located the main maps I need, and that I'm not missing anything obvious (or obscure for that matter)!

A couple of things I noticed whilst mapping my bin from the golf DAMOS (attached) that I found on one of the threads here, and questions regarding how I dealt with that.

• 1. Where the DAMOS had one map for some maps, my car had 3. The way I dealt with that was to re-align the map and duplicate the map settings. This seemed to work fine - Winols would find the x and y axes at the identical offset. Is that the best way to do it, or am I missing something?
• 2. The (y) axis in my LAMFA maps is not linear. Looking in both the DAMOS and my file (see image), the y axis is not plotted in a straight line - Is that the correct location for it or is it located elsewhere?
• 3. I have translated alot of my maps to english, some from an English MED7 FDEF, and the rest with google translate. Do they all look accurate or are there some dodgy interpretations in there?
• 4. Finally (for the moment  :D) Do I have any reason for concern flashing my car ('09 TT 8J) using an Mpps clone cable? I've read about the issues with the b7 A4, but have not come across anything saying there will be an issue, but just thought I would double check

I'll finish up by saying I am brand spanking new to all this stuff - I have always had a keen interest in learning how to tune, and I didn't realise what I was in for in learning MED9 as my first foray into tuning  :D
Any help and guidance is greatly appreciated, and I'm open to learning from everyone that knows this stuff back to front  :)
I've also read the forum guidelines but please let me know if I'm breaking any rules.

I'm having issues attaching my files so I will do so over a couple of posts-

Jeremy

My mapped bin and the DAMOS I mapped from attached ;D

Also, looking at my LAMFA maps, on the 3D view there was one point that looked out of place (LAMFA map 2 on the left in picture - I modified all maps after capture). Moving the map one byte resulted in it looking more realistic (LAMFA map 1). Do I have it correct or should I put it back?

LAMFA looks right but the load axis is still wrong. As far i know you need to move it one byte too.

Legend!

I was trying to move it one byte using the L/R arrows and it was jumping 2 bytes. I moved it using cursor location and viola! Linear y axis!

Thankyou  :D

More housekeeping.

Looks like got these 2 maps slightly wrong.

LDRXN and LDRXNZK look like they are in pairs, not consecutively like I had them.

It also looks like they were labelled incorrectly in the damos - Values were higher in ZK than in LDRXN.

Axis factor was also incorrect - was 0.1, copied from LDRXN to 0.25 (rpm originally went from 400-2720)

With the exception of the mid range of the 3rd ZK map, all ZK map values are now lower than RXN.



Does this look ok (besides the axis labels, which I just noticed)?

Values in ZK are in some files set higher, so the lack of power because of KR will not be too noticable.

Ah I see. I will probably have to Re- rename them then  :D

as far as i know this is just a theory.

personally i have never seen it switch to ZK no matter how much knock.

but yes, ZK is "always" set a little higher.

Thanks guys  ;D Names changed back to RXN being first.