Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MED9.1 biger maf calibration  (Read 7814 times)
teobolo
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


« on: December 06, 2017, 01:22:41 AM »

Hi to all , i m about  to calibrate a 90mm custom maf in a Audi s3 -tfsi car .I have read the ME7.5 wiki in which maps to touch but i think i m missing somethinng.To be more specific i have not manage to found any MLHFM map on the med.1 i only found KLAF & MSHFMTPH should i start from those maps? and then finalize idle and low loads corection with KFKHFM ? i m open to any income .
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2017, 09:48:11 AM »

MED9.1 does not have the map MLHFM. I can't comment 100% on the proper method (yet) but I should have some answers shortly. Did you search through the forum yet?
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-115
Offline Offline

Posts: 1070


« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2017, 10:32:02 AM »

MED9.1 2.0 TFSI has MSHFMTPH, because it uses mshfm_w instead of ml_w. Also the MAF output isn't a voltage anymore (uhfm_w) but a PWM signal (tpmshfm_w).
Logged

I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
teobolo
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2017, 01:17:33 AM »

MED9.1 does not have the map MLHFM. I can't comment 100% on the proper method (yet) but I should have some answers shortly. Did you search through the forum yet?
i have search but i have not found anything
Logged
teobolo
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2017, 01:20:08 AM »

MED9.1 2.0 TFSI has MSHFMTPH, because it uses mshfm_w instead of ml_w. Also the MAF output isn't a voltage anymore (uhfm_w) but a PWM signal (tpmshfm_w).

so i should start with MSHFMTPH ? Should i calculate how much % biger is the maf housing diameter accoriding to oem housing and then multiply that value to MSHFMTPH?This is the way i calculate biger maf calibration in to japanese cars .
Logged
littco
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 903


« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2017, 03:59:14 AM »

so i should start with MSHFMTPH ? Should i calculate how much % biger is the maf housing diameter accoriding to oem housing and then multiply that value to MSHFMTPH?This is the way i calculate biger maf calibration in to japanese cars .

There is a dos app that will load the map automatically find the maf scalar automatically , ask for the old size and the new size and increase and dump the modified file..
Logged
teobolo
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2017, 06:12:18 AM »

There is a dos app that will load the map automatically find the maf scalar automatically , ask for the old size and the new size and increase and dump the modified file..

can you point it to me where to find it  ?
Logged
focalpoint519
Full Member
***

Karma: +29/-65
Offline Offline

Posts: 148



« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2017, 09:48:22 AM »

maybe not usefull for your application, but good for voltage vs g/s maf rescaling

https://github.com/vimsh/mafscaling

http://www.romraider.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10481
Logged
vanrhj
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 55


« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2018, 03:44:25 AM »

Is your maf calibration sorted?
Logged
teobolo
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2018, 01:05:45 AM »

Is your maf calibration sorted?

Yes, with the maps o mention and some fine tuning from FKKVS it is fine
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.034 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)