Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy  (Read 16815 times)
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« on: October 02, 2011, 12:31:39 PM »

I think this info will help out a lot of people.



Lambda   E85 AFR   Gas AFR
0.500   4.880   7.350
0.510   4.978   7.497
0.520   5.075   7.644
0.530   5.173   7.791
0.540   5.270   7.938
0.550   5.368   8.085
0.560   5.466   8.232
0.570   5.563   8.379
0.580   5.661   8.526
0.590   5.758   8.673
0.600   5.856   8.820
0.610   5.954   8.967
0.620   6.051   9.114
0.630   6.149   9.261
0.640   6.246   9.408
0.650   6.344   9.555
0.660   6.442   9.702
0.670   6.539   9.849
0.680   6.637   9.996
0.690   6.734   10.143
0.700   6.832   10.290
0.710   6.930   10.437
0.720   7.027   10.584
0.730   7.125   10.731
0.740   7.222   10.878
0.750   7.320   11.025
0.760   7.418   11.172
0.770   7.515   11.319
0.780   7.613   11.466
0.790   7.710   11.613
0.800   7.808   11.760
0.810   7.906   11.907
0.820   8.003   12.054
0.830   8.101   12.201
0.840   8.198   12.348
0.850   8.296   12.495
0.860   8.394   12.642
0.870   8.491   12.789
0.880   8.589   12.936
0.890   8.686   13.083
0.900   8.784   13.230
0.910   8.882   13.377
0.920   8.979   13.524
0.930   9.077   13.671
0.940   9.174   13.818
0.950   9.272   13.965
0.960   9.370   14.112
0.970   9.467   14.259
0.980   9.565   14.406
0.990   9.662   14.553
1.000   9.760   14.700
1.010   9.858   14.847
1.020   9.955   14.994
1.030   10.053   15.141
1.040   10.150   15.288
1.050   10.248   15.435
1.060   10.346   15.582
1.070   10.443   15.729
1.080   10.541   15.876
1.090   10.638   16.023
1.100   10.736   16.170
1.110   10.834   16.317
1.120   10.931   16.464
1.130   11.029   16.611
1.140   11.126   16.758
1.150   11.224   16.905
1.160   11.322   17.052
1.170   11.419   17.199
1.180   11.517   17.346
1.190   11.614   17.493
1.200   11.712   17.640
1.210   11.810   17.787
1.220   11.907   17.934
1.230   12.005   18.081
1.240   12.102   18.228
1.250   12.200   18.375
1.260   12.298   18.522
1.270   12.395   18.669
1.280   12.493   18.816
1.290   12.590   18.963
1.300   12.688   19.110
1.310   12.786   19.257
1.320   12.883   19.404
1.330   12.981   19.551
1.340   13.078   19.698
1.350   13.176   19.845
1.360   13.274   19.992
1.370   13.371   20.139
1.380   13.469   20.286
1.390   13.566   20.433
1.400   13.664   20.580
1.410   13.762   20.727
1.420   13.859   20.874
1.430   13.957   21.021
1.440   14.054   21.168
1.450   14.152   21.315
1.460   14.250   21.462
1.470   14.347   21.609
1.480   14.445   21.756
1.490   14.542   21.903
1.500   14.640   22.050

 Wink
Logged
TTQS
Guest
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2011, 01:45:23 AM »

Page 15 of Engine Management Advanced Tuning by Greg Banish has a similar diagram. He quotes AFR of between 13.2 and 13.4:1 (lambda approx. 0.95) is ideal for best power. Similarly, he quotes AFR of about 15.5:1 (lambda approx. 1.05) for best economy.

Doug
Logged
Rick
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +63/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 704


« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2011, 06:19:12 AM »

Unfortunately,

a lot of that goes out of the window on knock limited turbo cars!
Logged
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +90/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2011, 11:01:25 AM »

That's for NA cars.

For Audi 5v stuff you want 11.6-12.4 under load and 14.7-15.5 at cruise depending on economy desired.

16 - 17 is too lean.
Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2011, 02:16:11 PM »

what afr do you want on decel?  i've been seeing wideband afr values of 22+ on high rpm decel...

what tables would we need correcting to fix decel afr?
Logged
Rick
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +63/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 704


« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2011, 02:29:17 PM »

thats because of the fuel cut
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2011, 03:34:01 PM »

Unfortunately,

a lot of that goes out of the window on knock limited turbo cars!

Rick: agreed. I'm finding 11.5 to 12 is appropriate for pump gas (91/93oct, US)

On race gas, what do you think is optimal?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2011, 05:55:27 PM »

That's for NA cars.

For Audi 5v stuff you want 11.6-12.4 under load and 14.7-15.5 at cruise depending on economy desired.

16 - 17 is too lean.
Yes this is for NA. For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste.
I run 1.1156 on my (non-boosted) 12v (16.4) for part throttle. Add timing to make up for lack of power while running lean on part throttle Wink

I thought that second chart was a nice addition since its a nice way to convert AFR to Lambda and vice versa.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2011, 05:57:16 PM by Gonzo » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2011, 06:34:38 PM »

For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste.

On 91oct, I find richer than 12 gives me a bit more timing and a lot less knock, especially with high IATs.

YMMV.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2011, 06:52:48 PM »

For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste.

On 91oct, I find richer than 12 gives me a bit more timing and a lot less knock, especially with high IATs.

YMMV.
I only use 93  Tongue
You can go a lil richer. Depends on gas and other factors like IAT, etc.

Edit: 99.9% of all my tuning work revolves around 1.8T. 2.7T might like to be a little richer.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2011, 07:05:16 PM by Gonzo » Logged
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2011, 11:25:26 PM »

thats because of the fuel cut

Could you possibly explain this more or give me an idea of where to read about it?

Thanks Rick!

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2011, 12:01:22 AM »

injectors and spark turns off on decel.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2011, 05:48:09 AM »

Yes this is for NA. For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste.
I run 1.1156 on my (non-boosted) 12v (16.4) for part throttle. Add timing to make up for lack of power while running lean on part throttle Wink

you're assuming every engine is the same.. it's not...

Also you're making very general statements... the more boost you run the more chance of knock, the more fuel you will need to run to cool the charge and keep knock to a minimum... the problem is you get to a point where combustion suffers when going too rich (usually lower then 11.3 or so) and you actually start to misfire from too much fuel.

16.4:1 is too lean IMO... some car might be ok with it.. but generally that is pretty rare, and if they are they're completely stock.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 06:09:07 AM by NOTORIOUS VR » Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
TTQS
Guest
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2011, 05:50:54 AM »

Quote
Also you're making very general statements...

That's the impression I got from the OP, but didn't really want to upset anyone by stating that...  Cry

At the fundamental level, there will always be an AFR just before or just after stoichiometry which corresponds to the ideal mixture for best power or best economy, but as we all know, there are so many other factors (enrichment for component protection or enleanment for a stratified charge regime) that cause it to be modified, it's hardly merits a new thread.

Doug
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 05:54:17 AM by TTQS » Logged
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2011, 07:41:32 AM »

you're assuming every engine is the same.. it's not...

Also you're making very general statements... the more boost you run the more chance of knock, the more fuel you will need to run to cool the charge and keep knock to a minimum... the problem is you get to a point where combustion suffers when going too rich (usually lower then 11.3 or so) and you actually start to misfire from too much fuel.

16.4:1 is too lean IMO... some car might be ok with it.. but generally that is pretty rare, and if they are they're completely stock.
Your assuming that my comments were general statements. They aren't.

Read:
I only use 93  Tongue
You can go a lil richer. Depends on gas and other factors like IAT, etc.

Edit: 99.9% of all my tuning work revolves around 1.8T.

Take all of my posts with a grain of salt, just like you should with every other statement on an internet forum. The only way to figure out the best AFR for your setup is to do a custom tune. I'm just saying what works for ME, and I wanted to contribute something to this forum.

In internal combustion engines there is a lot of factors that dictate what AFR you should run. In fact, just engine wear could affect that. Some like to be a little lean, some like to a little rich. The first graph I posted was for NA applications. For turbo applications you obviously want to go a little richer but it still gives you a good starting point.

Also my 12v doesn't seem to mind being lean. I use only 93+ though.

Stratified injection engines are another beast. You can go leaner on a stratified injection engine (TFSI/FSI) than on a 1.8T/2.7T and make good power.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 07:48:42 AM by Gonzo » Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.025 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)