Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Protecting read out via OBD  (Read 22634 times)
hackish
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 56


« Reply #30 on: December 23, 2015, 02:36:57 PM »

Some processors support protection. PPC comes to mind. Not so sure nor confident about the ST10. If you really wanted to lock someone out you'd do this and re-implement the flash loader to take an encrypted bin. Unfortunately OEMs are starting to take advantage of protections like this.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #31 on: December 23, 2015, 02:39:10 PM »

Some processors support protection. PPC comes to mind. Not so sure nor confident about the ST10. If you really wanted to lock someone out you'd do this and re-implement the flash loader to take an encrypted bin.

Nobody here (myself included) makes tunes so amazingly amazing that they warrant protection, IMO

Quote
Unfortunately OEMs are starting to take advantage of protections like this.

The VW emissions farce may change this.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +124/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2179


« Reply #32 on: December 23, 2015, 04:42:40 PM »

Nobody here (myself included) makes tunes so amazingly amazing that they warrant protection, IMO

Fuel, boost and timing, innit?
Logged
hackish
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 56


« Reply #33 on: December 23, 2015, 06:11:49 PM »

Nobody here (myself included) makes tunes so amazingly amazing that they warrant protection, IMO

I think the ME7xxx series of stuff is old enough that the market is sufficiently saturated. Now if you had a good tune for a ME17 late model car, that would be worth protecting. Most often companies approach me to have intellectual property developed and protected against competitors. Patching roms to add new features previously not available in the stock strategy is really where its at and these sorts of things are more worth protecting.
Logged
mister t
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +74/-18
Offline Offline

Posts: 343


« Reply #34 on: December 24, 2015, 01:03:54 AM »

Nobody here (myself included) makes tunes so amazingly amazing that they warrant protection, IMO

Tell that to JHM, apparently their tunes are so amazing that their sales people can't even tell you which kind of parameters they calibrated, you know, 'blah blah blah... intellectual property... blah blah blah...  Roll Eyes
Logged
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +90/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2016, 02:28:20 PM »

I think the ME7xxx series of stuff is old enough that the market is sufficiently saturated. Now if you had a good tune for a ME17 late model car, that would be worth protecting. Most often companies approach me to have intellectual property developed and protected against competitors. Patching roms to add new features previously not available in the stock strategy is really where its at and these sorts of things are more worth protecting.

Last sentence is it.
Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.022 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)