NefMoto > General > General Discussion > Smoothing Sensors
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
Author Topic: Smoothing Sensors  (Read 7104 times)
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +122/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2178
« on: September 13, 2016, 11:58:46 PM »
Following my last topic, how do you get smoother lambda sensor results?  My requested is smooth, but actual is jumping all over the line.  Why?
Logged
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +115/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2016, 05:19:35 AM »
Incorrect MAF scaling?  How bout a log?
Logged
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +122/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2178
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2016, 05:37:08 AM »
MAF is pulled from a CB file.  I'll throw a log up tonight.
Logged
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +115/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2016, 07:25:11 AM »
And you are sure you have sensor that matches your configuration?  CB is TT file?  there were two different MAF sensors with ever so slightly different output on TTs.
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2016, 11:55:30 AM »
Quote from: adam- on September 13, 2016, 11:58:46 PM
actual is jumping all over the line. 

By how much? Graph or log(s) yo.
Logged
"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +122/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2178
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2016, 12:33:37 PM »
Logs logs logs logs.
Logged
TijnCU
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +60/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


flying brick
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2016, 02:19:37 AM »
Completely stock intake side as was calibrated for by Bosch? Perfect injectors? Any difference in those 2 will affect fuel calculation and delivery obviously.
Besides, I see a fluctuation of +/- 0.02 lambda or 0.3afr (about 2,4% fluctuation from requested), you think that is very bad? An engine is not a static system  Smiley
« Last Edit: September 15, 2016, 02:36:35 AM by TijnCU » Logged
My project (all photos back online!)
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +122/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2178
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2016, 05:34:33 AM »
I just thought it would follow more.  Never did the calculations to see the percentage different, just thought it would follow better.

Injectors are brand new (within 20km).  Might be kfkhfm slightly out.  Going to use Guitar's fixer to aid fkvvs.
Logged
TijnCU
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +60/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


flying brick
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2016, 05:56:51 AM »
I just meant to say its very hard to go perfect on such a system with many variables. I did not even mention the lambda sensor itself (how trustful is that one after you've been antilagging the shit out of it?) The fkkvs fixer has worked very good for me, but I dont chase perfect figures. Within 5% I'm happy :-)
Logged
My project (all photos back online!)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Navigation
Personal Tools
  • April 26, 2024, 11:06:42 AM
  • Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?

    Login with username, password and session length
Search
 
Advanced Search
About Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved 2010 Nefarious Motosports
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.017 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)