Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Requested boost is not equal to requested load on light modded 1.8t 180  (Read 11533 times)
littco
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 903


« Reply #15 on: September 30, 2016, 03:12:09 AM »

Hope pump arrive tommorow, but i think will be on injector limit even on good fuel pump anyway.

Im not very familiar of understaning FR , but i found some similar named items in OLS damos files:

CWDMIL  = 1  (in randomly choosed 225 CB file  is 0)
KMITIBGR = 2.503% (in 225 is 13.59%)
PVMITIBGR = 0.5% (in 225 is 0.75%)

is this what you meaned?

suggest your over and under load problems are due to the KFDIMX map not being correct. Altough the compressor is still a stock size the billet wheels are hugely more effecient and can easily power upto 280bhp ( larger turbine needed though) because of this the ECU struggles.

Logged
curamrdan
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 128


« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2016, 04:13:33 AM »

suggest your over and under load problems are due to the KFDIMX map not being correct. Altough the compressor is still a stock size the billet wheels are hugely more effecient and can easily power upto 280bhp ( larger turbine needed though) because of this the ECU struggles.

KFDMIX is driven by target boost , which is correct and stable at all rev range, just load is not matching. So as i dont know how "calibrate" boost calculation to suit true load of modified engine , i did oposite = "manipulate" load to suit boost of factory engine. Its worse way, but i want to prevent some load error issues.

I dont have personal experience with billet wheels as much, but if wheel is physicaly-design identical to factory, only have little less weight and have extendet tip, i dont expect any massive gains. All benefits are only "teoretical" to build more hype people to buy and put inside their factory turbo. My opinion. Never personaly(not internet) seen or tune 280bhp in real even on K04-23.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2016, 09:38:23 AM »

If actual boost meets req boost, actual fueling meets req fueling, and fuel trims are near zero, any remaining load deviation has nothing to do with the turbos, rather, your MAF (and or VE) is calibrated wrong (or you have other assorted hardware issues - leaks, etc.).

You should probably review the s4wiki again, you're way off base.

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.029 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)