Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: rl_w higher after 5120 mod to 551M 0002  (Read 19865 times)
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +116/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2017, 07:45:08 AM »

rl_w is supposed to stay the same.

agree,  when I switched on my MKIV, there was no diff in load.  The base file you are using just might not be 100%.
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2017, 08:53:15 AM »

0A 51 to 85 28 at 0x50926.
At least I noticed that different between my RS6 5120 conversion and whatever public M-box 5120 file.
That's "10.13 [hPa/%]" multiplier on page 289 of FR.

Thanks for the hint, nub. I didn't use a base 5120, rather used my tuned file (which I was happy with, but riding the map limit), and made all the changes myself based on what I've read on here. I did not have those values you mentioned changed in my file. Thanks also for verifying rl should not have changed, wasn't sure on that.
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #17 on: April 10, 2017, 02:26:26 PM »

rl_w is still high after changing those values. I also wanted to add, changing those values nubcake suggested created a big dead spot when getting back on the gas after a shift. Maybe this can clue me in to where the issue is? I didn't notice these ASM changes in any of the other 5120 files I've seen posted on here (Nyet's and Britishturbo's). Going to go through the file again, to see if I can spot anything.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 07:23:08 PM by vwaudiguy » Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #18 on: April 10, 2017, 06:41:17 PM »

rl_w is still high after changing those values. Going to go through the file again.

Double-check KFPRG/URL and asm divisions/multiplications.
Here's the abstract of my old 5120 cheat sheet. Expected result and var name. It could be partially inaccurate, but hopefully will be of some help.

EDIT: or just try the public 5120 file, possibly with that fix I mentioned. Tongue

half:same:double:
fvisrm_wfho_wpsrlro_w
plgrus_wfpvdkds_wfupsrl_w
plsolpspvds_w
plsol_wpspvdb_w
pirg_wpspvdk_w
pirgro_wpsspvdk_w
ps_wvpsspls_w
psfg_wvpsspu_w
pssol_wfpvdkds
pupspu
pu_wftsr
pus_wfbakl_w
pvdkfrhodkr_w
pvdk_wpsspvdkb_w
pvdkdspsspvdkd_w
pvdkds_wvpssplg_w
pvdkdsl_wfpvdkdsl_w
pvdks_w
pvdksf_w
pbr_w
pbrint_w
pdpld_w
plgru_w
plgruo_w
plgruso_w
plmaxa_w
psmp_w
psmx_w
psp_w
pspmx_w
pukor_w
pukorf_w
pumean_w
pvdkmx_w
pvdkr_w
dpus_w
pte_w
pterw_w
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 06:43:51 PM by nubcake » Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2017, 07:25:44 PM »

Thanks for the help, nubcake. Are these the public files you speak of?

http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=3027.msg29815#msg29815

I've compared them to mine, and they are the same except for the values you change for different map sensors. I'm using a 4 bar.
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #20 on: April 10, 2017, 08:57:21 PM »

Guys, please let me know if you find errors in that file!

Really, I'd super lots appreciate it.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2017, 09:29:42 PM »

Can someone say what maps need to be changed, and their values when using a 4 bar sensor (03K 906 051)? Also, are there any asm changes required?

DSLGRAD
DSLOFS
....
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 10:29:49 PM by vwaudiguy » Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #22 on: April 10, 2017, 10:09:47 PM »

Guys, please let me know if you find errors in that file!

Really, I'd super lots appreciate it.

.kp I have -  DSLGRAD 0.015625*eprom
.kp you posted for the 5120 changes - DSLGRAD 0.031250*eprom

but DSLGRAD is also changed between the stock map, and 3 bar file. I thought maybe change the factor or the value, but not both.

?
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 10:12:34 PM by vwaudiguy » Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #23 on: April 10, 2017, 10:44:26 PM »

From the Manifold air pressure:Rescale project

DSLGRAD      - Divide by 2
DSLOFS      - Divide by 2

but

DSLGRAD       (stock M box) 541
DSLGRAD (Nyet' 3 bar 5120) 329

DSLOFS (stock) -16.40
DSLOFS (Nyet 3 bar 5120) -31.75

Is this because he's using a 3 bar sensor in that file? If so, it doesn't seem like the math adds up. It's also late, and I'm exhausted.  Smiley
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #24 on: April 10, 2017, 11:08:04 PM »

Then going by this, I get a different number. Do you use DSLGRAD calculated from the sensor (894.091) and then divide that by 2? Or just input DSLGRAD directly.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 11:13:04 PM by vwaudiguy » Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2017, 11:41:33 PM »

Then going by this, I get a different number. Do you use DSLGRAD calculated from the sensor (894.091) and then divide that by 2? Or just input DSLGRAD directly.

If you have the full kp (not the one in the thread linked above), input the calculated DSLGRAD directly IN THE 5120 FOLDER of that kp:

http://files.s4wiki.com/defs/8D0907551M-20130729.zip

Outside of that folder, the DSLGRAD should be half of that (there are two DSLGRADs/DSLOFSs maps in that kp. the xdf linked in the other post/thread above only has a few maps).
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 11:45:08 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2017, 12:11:00 AM »

Thanks, Nyet. I don't see a 5120 folder in that .kp though?
« Last Edit: April 11, 2017, 06:49:32 AM by vwaudiguy » Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
spacey3
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 198


« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2017, 01:30:16 AM »

I'm not sure if this will be any help to you guys but I've attached the .xdf I used to convert my 1.8t to 5120.

There's a folder 5120 with a full list of variables I changed with division/multiplication in the description, serves as a list if nothing else.

Hope it helps (apologies if I'm just cluttering).
Logged
TijnCU
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +60/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


flying brick


« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2017, 01:52:21 AM »

To be sure about correct numbers in dslgrad I would set the values to stock (check factor), change them according to the map sensor and then divide by 2.
Also, I have found it to be very easy to change the wrong values if you work from hex. In a disassembled file you can see much better what you are doing, not all divisions are supposed to be changed. Don't know if you copied from hex or worked from a disassembled file, but its worth the check  Smiley
Here is my asm changes for a working 1.8t wideband file: (also tested on a narrowband ecu, works fine)
Code:
mov r4, #654Dh < #32A6h
mov r5, fkmsdk_w
mulu r5, r4
(division pvdk_w #1)
 
Next section:
Mov r4, #654Dh < #32A6h
Mov r2, fpvdk_w
Mulu r2, r4
(division pvdk_w #2)
 
Next:
Mov r4, pvdkdsl_w
Mov r2, #287h <  #50Eh
Mulu r4, r2
(division fpvdkds  #1)
 
Next:
Mov r4, pvdkdsl_w
Mov r2, #287h <  #50Eh
Mulu r4, r2
(division fpvdkds  #2)
 
Next:
Mov r8, pus_w
Mov r4, pus_w
Mov r2, #287h <  #50Eh
Mulu r4, r2
(division fho_w)
 
Last:
Mov [r0+2], r4
Mov [r0+4], r5
Mov r3, #654Dh < #32A6h
(division frhodkr_w)
« Last Edit: April 11, 2017, 02:03:27 AM by TijnCU » Logged

vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2017, 06:55:20 AM »

Thanks for the help, everybody. I'm going with DSLGRAD calculated from the spec sheet/wiki and dividing by 2. Should be able to test shortly. I've collected 4-5 "4 bar 5120" files on here and every one of them has different values for DSLGRAD and DSLOFS. Smiley I wonder if these other folks just end up tuning around it.
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.028 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)