Pages: [1]
Author Topic: mpc56x TOC & SDA for IDA Pro  (Read 9734 times)
carl0s
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 22



« on: November 18, 2017, 12:42:00 PM »

Lots of people ask what the TOC and SDA addresses are when disassembling mpc5xx stuff.

Is it not true that TOC is only used in 64 bit PPC and not relevant at all? ( http://devpit.org/wiki/Debugging_PowerPC_ELF_Binaries#The_.toc_section_on_powerpc64 )


I think SDA = "Small Data Area". What are the implications of not knowing this address?

I am seeing much greater results by simply entering the correct memory mapping. Now at least I see proper data structures in IDA, but it's still all rubbish to me. A side-project while I continue with my KWP2000 datalogger.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2017, 12:46:43 PM by carl0s » Logged

--
Carl
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2017, 06:16:41 PM »

If we're talking about MED9/EDC16 series, simply search for writes to r13 and r2 to properly determine those:

Code:
lis       r13, unk_7FFFF0@ha # unk_7FFFF0
addi      r13, r13, unk_7FFFF0@l # unk_7FFFF0
lis       r2, unk_5C9FF0@ha # unk_5C9FF0
addi      r2, r2, unk_5C9FF0@l # unk_5C9FF0
Logged
carl0s
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 22



« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2017, 05:49:25 AM »

Thanks nubcake Smiley

I have seen this mentioned but I'm trying to find background on it.

Annoyingly, I just found this which says TOC is part of PowerPC32.. ( https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/ssw_aix_72/com.ibm.aix.alangref/idalangref_reg_use_conv.htm )


I thought I had read something in MPC56x documentation which stated these things but I can't find it in either the User's Manual, or the Reference Manual.
Logged

--
Carl
carl0s
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 22



« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2017, 06:02:39 AM »

If we're talking about MED9/EDC16 series, simply search for writes to r13 and r2 to properly determine those:

Code:
lis       r13, unk_7FFFF0@ha # unk_7FFFF0
addi      r13, r13, unk_7FFFF0@l # unk_7FFFF0
lis       r2, unk_5C9FF0@ha # unk_5C9FF0
addi      r2, r2, unk_5C9FF0@l # unk_5C9FF0

So this is what I see:
Code:
ROM:000810E0                 lis       r13, 0x80
ROM:000810E4                 addi      r13, r13, -0x10 # 0x7FFFF0
ROM:000810E8                 lis       r2, 1
ROM:000810EC                 addi      r2, r2, 0x7FF0 # 0x17FF0

(I have loaded in the .bin at 0x80000 as per the memory map specs from documentation).

I guess I still have a lot of learning to do. Those addresses don't even exist in the address space that I've created in IDA, and the docs say that 0x000000 to 0x07FFFF is used by UC3F Flash (on-chip flash), which I thought wasn't utilised at all in these ECUs

This is a 2009 BMW motorbike BMSKP. It has a 2mb external flash which is my .bin size. Unfortunately I do not know what is the equivalent EDC/ME(D) series. most of those seem to have much smaller flash.

Anyway, I just found the 800gb DAMOS that's floating around the internet, (I only had 10gb collection before), so hopefully I'll find something useful in there to help me on my way to understanding this.

Ultimately, I guess I want to do something like what you guys have done with ME7Logger and similar tools, where I can readMemorybyAddress, and I need to find out the memory locations for the values I am interested in. For now, I will use readDatabyLocalIdentifier, which gives me ~26 values all at once, but there is one value missing from the packet, so I have to do two different requests, which can halve the rate of information (update frequency).. I have almost everything I want in a known kwp2000 request (Analog Values), but it doesn't contain "Open loop / closed loop" status. That is in a different request/response (Digital Values). I'd like to put everything I want into a single request and have that update fast for my datalogger.

At the end of the day it's a long term project for me, and this disassembly business is the part I am most likely to fail at, but I am well on my way with kwp2000 debugging/capturing etc.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2017, 07:51:20 AM by carl0s » Logged

--
Carl
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2017, 02:34:18 PM »

MED9 has 2Mb flash, which resides at 0x0, so you could try doing the same. Don't forget to use those newly found values for TOC(r2) and SDA(r13).
However, MED9 has internal flash (512K) at a different address, so I might be misleading you.

But SDA you found definitely matches MED9 one, meaning at least RAM addresses could be similar.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2018, 05:35:51 PM by nubcake » Logged
carl0s
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 22



« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2017, 03:19:37 PM »

MED9 has 2Mb flash, which resides at 0x0, so you could try trying the same. Don't forget to use those newly found values for TOC(r2) and SDA(r13).
However, MED9 has internal flash (512K) at a different address, so I might be misleading you.

But SDA you found definitely matches MED9 one, meaning at least RAM addresses could be similar.

Med 9 has mpc562 CPU my bmskp has mpc564. They are almost the same but mine has 512kb on-chip flash there as well. (See https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QZPwFWwabeAubCKdapLA69EgEuF0IOkD/view?usp=drivesdk ). I'm a little confused though because my initial BDM backups with bdm100 don't include that (it's only 2mb) however OBD backup with kess is 2.5mb. maybe I should be analysing the 2.5mb file instead. I suppose it's possible bdm100 and 12 year old dim555 software was unaware of the extra 512kb, and just read it as an mpc562, but I restorered the 2mb bdm to another ECU and it was ok, so I had been thinking the 512kb was unused.

kess and ktag are new additions to the toolbox and I think I have been analysing my original dim555 / bdm100 backups..

I will take a BDM backup with ktag, see if that is 2.5mb, and load that up in Ida instead :-)
 
Logged

--
Carl
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2018, 05:37:48 PM »

I know it's been a couple of months, but still worth mentioning:
TOC can be different for boot-up and actual main loop, check all r2 references. Pick those that make more sense for "normal" operation, unless you're interested strictly in bootloader operation. Also, beware of publicly available 7.0 IDA: it doesn't really want to properly modify code for "toc" references. Or I couldn't get it to. Ended up writing some simple script that goes over all "r2" references and "Ctrl-R"'s them.
Logged
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-114
Offline Offline

Posts: 1070


« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2018, 08:17:46 AM »

can you share the 2.5mb backup?
Logged

I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Offline Offline

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2024, 12:33:36 AM »

For Volvo and Ford ME9 settings looks like:
Code:
ROM:000E4B88                 lis       r13, 0x80
ROM:000E4B8C                 addi      r13, r13, -0x10
ROM:000E4B90                 lis       r2, 0x5D # ']'
ROM:000E4B94                 addi      r2, r2, -0x4E10

So
Code:
r13 = 0x800000 - 0x10 = 0x7FFFF0 = TOC/SDA (r2) address
r2 = 0x5D0000 - 0x4E10 = 0x5CB1F0 = SDA (r13) addr
And accoring to the naming IDA has wrong naming for the values. But these settings work fine.
Logged

Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)