NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
 Offline
Posts: 1056
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: April 05, 2012, 05:56:22 AM »
|
|
|
I forgot to ask, did you use the button "Suggest OPTIMAL x axis"? Yes I did. And do not forget to update LDRXN! Because right now I see that your LDRXN limits your KFMIOP map, thus eating you aggresivness! (suggestion: try to fill LDRXN with values -> 228) That was your programs suggestions if you used the button "Suggest OPTIMAL x axis" then you'll have additionaly to update KFZWOP/2 maps (because they share same axis with kfmiop). I did that as well |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #166 on: April 05, 2012, 06:03:55 AM »
|
|
|
Yes I did.
That was your programs suggestions
I did that as well
LDRXN isn't suggested by my program. Please recheck. Maybe you put original kfmirl map inside LDRXN calculator? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #167 on: April 05, 2012, 06:34:00 AM »
|
|
|
LDRXN isn't suggested by my program. Please recheck. Maybe you put original kfmirl map inside LDRXN calculator?
no that is the IRL map that your program suggested. This issue was not LDRXN, as that only caps load. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lulu2003
Full Member
Karma: +11/-1
Offline
Posts: 242
|
|
« Reply #168 on: April 05, 2012, 12:52:27 PM »
|
|
|
I get very strange ingnition angels if I use the KFZWOP converter.
to understand it right: wasn't the meaning to scale (interpolate, may be extrapolate) the values for the new and extended load axis?
therefore angle should be the same for the same load row?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #169 on: April 06, 2012, 02:35:01 AM »
|
|
|
no that is the IRL map that your program suggested. This issue was not LDRXN, as that only caps load.
and on low rpm it limits your load. Please compare your LDRXN to KFMIRL map at same RPM values. Also I think, I've found what is causing the problem.... When you are using kfmirl to kfmiop calculator please do not modify it's axis (do not use "suggest OPTIMAL x-axis") and leave stock kfzwop. I think that problem here is with the kfzwop/2 maps... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #170 on: April 06, 2012, 02:38:45 AM »
|
|
|
I get very strange ingnition angels if I use the KFZWOP converter.
to understand it right: wasn't the meaning to scale (interpolate, may be extrapolate) the values for the new and extended load axis?
therefore angle should be the same for the same load row?!
If you disable smoothing then it should be the same, except for situations where values in original kfzwop map are different between last two values in columns and rows, then my algorithm find difference between these two values and then apply it to the extended values. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lulu2003
Full Member
Karma: +11/-1
Offline
Posts: 242
|
|
« Reply #171 on: April 06, 2012, 03:36:33 AM »
|
|
|
ok, disable smoothing did eleminate the main strangeness!  But the extrapolation of the last two value is not correct, at least not linear: Example: original:
load angel
----------
142 31
150 30
180 29
converted:
load angel
----------
150 30.75
180 30.0
210 21.75
where I would expect:
load angel
----------
150 30.0
180 29.0
210 28.0 any idea? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #172 on: April 06, 2012, 09:47:24 AM »
|
|
|
I would trust your math over an automated template at this point
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
professor
|
|
« Reply #173 on: April 22, 2012, 03:04:32 PM »
|
|
|
Guys cant use it on office 2010 x64.
"Compile error in hidden module: CHANGE_APP_ICON".
A protected module contains a compilation error. Because the error is in a protected module it cannot be displayed.
This error commonly occurs when code is incompatible with the version or architecture of this application (for example, code in a document targets 32-bit Microsoft Office applications but it is attempting to run on 64-bit Office).
This error has the following cause and solution:
Cause of the error:
The error is raised when a compilation error exists in the VBA code inside a protected (hidden) module. The specific compilation error is not exposed because the module is protected.
Possible solutions:
If you have access to the VBA code in the document or project, unprotect the module, and then run the code again to view the specific error.
If you do not have access to the VBA code in the document, then contact the document author to have the code in the hidden module updated.
Is it possible to upload it for x64 office versions?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Seat Ibiza MK4 Cupra 1.8t 20V, stg3.
"Those 1.8T 20V machines are really tough" ©
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #174 on: April 22, 2012, 04:31:02 PM »
|
|
|
Guys cant use it on office 2010 x64.
"Compile error in hidden module: CHANGE_APP_ICON".
A protected module contains a compilation error. Because the error is in a protected module it cannot be displayed.
This error commonly occurs when code is incompatible with the version or architecture of this application (for example, code in a document targets 32-bit Microsoft Office applications but it is attempting to run on 64-bit Office).
This error has the following cause and solution:
Cause of the error:
The error is raised when a compilation error exists in the VBA code inside a protected (hidden) module. The specific compilation error is not exposed because the module is protected.
Possible solutions:
If you have access to the VBA code in the document or project, unprotect the module, and then run the code again to view the specific error.
If you do not have access to the VBA code in the document, then contact the document author to have the code in the hidden module updated.
Is it possible to upload it for x64 office versions?
Please use office 2007. For some odd reason 2010 version doesn;t work (problems in vba or something) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tuffty
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 28
|
|
« Reply #175 on: April 23, 2012, 05:25:23 AM »
|
|
|
Please use office 2007. For some odd reason 2010 version doesn;t work (problems in vba or something)
I have got it 'working' in 2010 in so much as it complains about a compilation error but still appears to change values etc... not checked it against 2007 yet to see if it creates nonsense data but will be installing 2007 on my XP VM where I use WinOLS and see what happens.. <tuffty/> |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
professor
|
|
« Reply #176 on: April 23, 2012, 08:05:55 AM »
|
|
|
Please use office 2007. For some odd reason 2010 version doesn;t work (problems in vba or something)
On office 2007 works well. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Seat Ibiza MK4 Cupra 1.8t 20V, stg3.
"Those 1.8T 20V machines are really tough" ©
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #177 on: May 14, 2012, 05:08:18 PM »
|
|
|
UPDATED!! FKKVS FIXER v1.1
New features:
* Brand new guessing algorithm of missing values
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leon Mk1
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 24
|
|
« Reply #178 on: May 19, 2012, 11:54:37 AM »
|
|
|
eurodyne maestro7 user here
just noticed that my KFZWOP map in maestro is 12x16
and on tuner wizzard that map is 11x16
how can i generate this map ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #179 on: May 20, 2012, 12:15:20 AM »
|
|
|
eurodyne maestro7 user here
just noticed that my KFZWOP map in maestro is 12x16
and on tuner wizzard that map is 11x16
how can i generate this map ?
Well, you could use 11 fields and the last one leave stock or just try to interpolate last field |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
