Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 20
Author Topic: ME7 TUNER WIZARD  (Read 199784 times)
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #180 on: May 26, 2012, 03:05:03 PM »

UPDATED!! FKKVS FIXER v1.1a
New features:
+ Fixed a bug where user had to press on GUESS VALUES cell for it to work instead of auto-enable

UPDATED!! ME7 MAIN
New features:
+ UPGRADED to Office 2010
* Added RMB menu item: "Copy 2D Inverse Map", that allows easy transfer to WINOLS.
Logged

Nottingham
Full Member
***

Karma: +13/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 204


« Reply #181 on: May 29, 2012, 05:19:59 AM »

The latest version gives: Compile error in hidden module: CHANGE_APP_ICON.
This is with Excel 2010.

Also none of the calculation functions actually calculate anything (even if the variables are nulled the results remain the same).
With both Excel 2007 & 2010.

What am I missing?
Logged
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #182 on: May 29, 2012, 08:13:07 AM »

The latest version gives: Compile error in hidden module: CHANGE_APP_ICON.
This is with Excel 2010.

Also none of the calculation functions actually calculate anything (even if the variables are nulled the results remain the same).
With both Excel 2007 & 2010.

What am I missing?

Hm... now that is interesting... Have you enabled macros?
Logged

Nottingham
Full Member
***

Karma: +13/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 204


« Reply #183 on: May 29, 2012, 09:04:50 AM »

Yes, all macros have been enable.
Logged
Nottingham
Full Member
***

Karma: +13/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 204


« Reply #184 on: May 29, 2012, 10:55:24 PM »

I checked the "source" of your file.
The icon you are trying to use is not located in /system32/ on newer (64-bit) systems, instead in the sysroot.

Also for this specific script you must declare PtrSafe to make it run on 64-bit OS.
Logged
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #185 on: May 30, 2012, 06:32:23 AM »

I checked the "source" of your file.
The icon you are trying to use is not located in /system32/ on newer (64-bit) systems, instead in the sysroot.

Also for this specific script you must declare PtrSafe to make it run on 64-bit OS.

I am using 64bit win7 and no problems at all. If you know a fix for your specific case then try to implement somekind of precheck and add fix then upload here I'll try to check it and then if everything is ok I'll update first post
Logged

Nottingham
Full Member
***

Karma: +13/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 204


« Reply #186 on: May 30, 2012, 07:21:19 AM »

I just added "PtrSafe" to the three declares in APP_ICON function.
Now it works without giving the error all the time.

However I could not get the new icon (7) working even I relocated the source (explorer.exe).
Is is working for you then?
Logged
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #187 on: May 30, 2012, 08:36:59 AM »

I just added "PtrSafe" to the three declares in APP_ICON function.
Now it works without giving the error all the time.

However I could not get the new icon (7) working even I relocated the source (explorer.exe).
Is is working for you then?

It is working for me... Maybe you could try to msgbox if your environment variable points to correct dir? Or atleast open explorer.exe with reshacker and see if there's icon with index 7... Wink
Logged

masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #188 on: June 05, 2012, 02:39:59 PM »

UPDATED!! BRAND NEW EEPROM MODDER v1.0
New features:
+ Autofix EEPROM checksums
+ Edit EXTRA INFO fields
+ Edit SKC KEY


NOTE: Checksums autofix isn't finished yet and doesn't always work 100%. Use with caution! Smiley
Logged

masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #189 on: June 20, 2012, 06:25:57 AM »

UPDATED!! KFMIRL ADVISER v1.3
New features:
+ Added preset option, which currently models K03 turbo from it's compressor map (1.8T only!, ALPHA VERSION - TESTING needed!)
Logged

schattenparker
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 26


« Reply #190 on: August 09, 2012, 09:02:01 AM »

very great work, but can you change the last Version so that i don`t get the Failur: Compile error in hidden module: CHANGE_APP_ICON.
Logged
A6turbofrance
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 119


« Reply #191 on: August 10, 2012, 07:10:40 PM »

can u help me i got message error
if u can have my kfmiop with good value that will be great
here is my project file kfmirl and kfmiop columns are good i need kfmiop modified.
let me know if u can help me
Logged
Il Signor Zetec
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 48


« Reply #192 on: August 24, 2012, 01:18:02 AM »

Hello very interesting excel and thread! How I have to consider a k04? Big turbo (respect to a k03) or small turbo (respect to a 2871 for example )? Checking the kfmirl adviser values with the boost and values of a tt bfv ecu seems that the suggested excel values are very lower than the original !
Logged
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #193 on: August 24, 2012, 03:52:40 AM »

Hello very interesting excel and thread! How I have to consider a k04? Big turbo (respect to a k03) or small turbo (respect to a 2871 for example )? Checking the kfmirl adviser values with the boost and values of a tt bfv ecu seems that the suggested excel values are very lower than the original !


yes, they're lower because they're already calculated without LDRXN limit. After that try to use LDRXN sheet and you'll see different LDRXN limit. To me there's no point in using two limits since with kfmirl you can choose final load based not only on rpm (ldrxn limitation) but also on requested load.

Now to answer your other question: I would say try "big turbo" preset for K04 and see if turbo can keep up with the boost request....
Logged

Il Signor Zetec
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 48


« Reply #194 on: August 25, 2012, 01:55:18 AM »

yes, they're lower because they're already calculated without LDRXN limit. After that try to use LDRXN sheet and you'll see different LDRXN limit. To me there's no point in using two limits since with kfmirl you can choose final load based not only on rpm (ldrxn limitation) but also on requested load.

Now to answer your other question: I would say try "big turbo" preset for K04 and see if turbo can keep up with the boost request....

ok thank you very much.
I will test the sheet and results and I will write again here Wink
bye
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 19 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)