Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: PSOL calculation  (Read 11400 times)
ibizaCUPRA18t
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 153


« Reply #15 on: May 22, 2018, 04:07:07 PM »

If you see 2550mbar as your boost pressure actual, then your map sensor is dead or not even connected... Have u even wondered about this lol.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2018, 04:55:24 PM »

If you see 2550mbar as your boost pressure actual, then your map sensor is dead or not even connected... Have u even wondered about this lol.

His problem isn't actual, it is requested (plsol)
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
totti
Full Member
***

Karma: +15/-29
Offline Offline

Posts: 227


« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2018, 10:39:28 AM »

Shot in the dark - are you sure you are logging the right variable?

Yes we checked it with VCDS too. The plsol is 2550 all the time.
Logged
totti
Full Member
***

Karma: +15/-29
Offline Offline

Posts: 227


« Reply #18 on: May 28, 2018, 03:02:54 PM »

I try to recalculate kfmirl and ldrxn. For kfmirl I use to ME7 Tuner Wizzard. For the maximum boost 1,45 the max value is 205. At the excel sheet there is a generator function for kfmiop. Is it good to use that too? I read a lot of forum entries about kfmiop and kfmirl but I don't know how can I set kfmiop. Is it good to set the last column of the load axis to 205 and fill all of the values at that column to 94? The excel tool suggest 100.

Thanks for the help
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #19 on: May 28, 2018, 03:20:42 PM »

None of your tweaking makes any sense until you fix plsol which has nothing to do with the maps you're messing around with.

ONE thing at a time.

In fact, i'd try stock LDRXN first.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
totti
Full Member
***

Karma: +15/-29
Offline Offline

Posts: 227


« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2018, 11:42:45 PM »

None of your tweaking makes any sense until you fix plsol which has nothing to do with the maps you're messing around with.

ONE thing at a time.

In fact, i'd try stock LDRXN first.

If you check my first post, when I changed back to stock LDRXN, the PLSOL went to fix. With higher values the plsol is not fix, but lower than the required.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2018, 11:45:39 PM »

If you check my first post, when I changed back to stock LDRXN, the PLSOL went to fix. With higher values the plsol is not fix, but lower than the required.

I have no idea what this means. 2550 is not lower than required, it is bad.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
jochen_145
Full Member
***

Karma: +9/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2018, 12:49:03 AM »

If you check my first post, when I changed back to stock LDRXN, the PLSOL went to fix.
I am quite sure, somewere you bend rlsol_w in a case, that PLSOL is calculated more then 2550hPa..

If you limit rl_w via LDRXN to lower values, everything seems to work well. So IMO you only bend rlsol_w at high values, witch is normal way of non-linare tuning chances.

@nyet:
Quote
No, (add: KFMIRL) it is requested load depending on engine speed and requested torque (pedal).
The load request to pressure conversion is not affected.
Can you pls. tell more precise, what you mean with "load" ?
Funktionsrahmen tells  KFMIRL request filling, so RLSOL_W depents directly form KFMIRL and at so the end PLSOL..

Where is my missunterstanding ?
Logged
totti
Full Member
***

Karma: +15/-29
Offline Offline

Posts: 227


« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2018, 02:09:31 AM »

I have no idea what this means. 2550 is not lower than required, it is bad.

If LDRXN has the values around 230 the PLSOL is not fix, it is around 1,1 bar. If I set LDRXN to 180 the PLSOL will be the maximum and fix.
Logged
totti
Full Member
***

Karma: +15/-29
Offline Offline

Posts: 227


« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2018, 02:12:03 AM »

If LDRXN has the values around 230 the PLSOL is not fix, it is around 1,1 bar. If I set LDRXN to 180 the PLSOL will be the maximum and fix.
1.
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=14299.0;attach=25538;image
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=14299.0;attach=25546;image

2.
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=14299.0;attach=25552;image
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=14299.0;attach=25556;image
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.02 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)