Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: tuning path NA S4  (Read 26100 times)
airtite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +13/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 741


« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2012, 02:13:29 AM »

this will be my first v8 I have ever owned, one of the other bigger capacity cars I have owned was a 1989 325is (m3) and I loved the sound/power of the 2.7l straight six bmw motor since then its been a mixture of audis 1.8ts and a freelander v6. My current 1.8T is pretty strong but its at the point now where I will need too go BT to get more power where as the s4 stock has more kw than what my modified 1.8T has, although the 1.8T does feel faster I have fallen in love with the deep grumble of the 4.2l V8. I have been modifying cars and bikes my whole life so its not going too take me long too start modifying the v8. In my head its probably going too be intake, branches, exhaust, cams and as with every other NA motor I am sure those mods will release some hidden potential in that motor. 
Logged
jibberjive
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +23/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 536


« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2012, 04:38:20 AM »

I'm interested in following the tuning of this.  Keep us updated if you get it.
Logged
airtite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +13/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 741


« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2012, 06:50:28 AM »

cant read the ecu on the car for some reason  Tongue
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2012, 09:58:24 AM »

In my head its probably going too be intake, branches, exhaust, cams and as with every other NA motor I am sure those mods will release some hidden potential in that motor. 

Not really.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
cactusgreens4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 110


« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2012, 10:53:05 AM »

I5 >> 2.7tt > v10 > 4.2tt > 3.0sc >> 2.0t > 1.8t
So your saying that the 2.7tt is better than the v8 twin turbo found in the rs6? Why is this so?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2012, 11:34:57 AM »

ease of maintenance Smiley

pulling the motor for a turbo swap is one thing. pulling it for an O2 swap...

but in all seriousness, i love the 4.2tt, but my heart still yearns for the v10 and i have a soft spot for the 2.7tt
« Last Edit: February 16, 2012, 01:02:30 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
jibberjive
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +23/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 536


« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2012, 12:58:51 PM »

cant read the ecu on the car for some reason  Tongue
What year?
Logged
cactusgreens4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 110


« Reply #22 on: February 17, 2012, 05:22:04 PM »

ease of maintenance Smiley

pulling the motor for a turbo swap is one thing. pulling it for an O2 swap...

but in all seriousness, i love the 4.2tt, but my heart still yearns for the v10 and i have a soft spot for the 2.7tt

I would say the v10 5 liter twin turbo in the new rs6 over the 4.2 v8 twin turbo however I have never worked on either only the 2.7tt however I can imagine a lot more ponies from the other two...
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +38/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


Breaks everything!


« Reply #23 on: February 17, 2012, 07:56:58 PM »

So your saying that the 2.7tt is better than the v8 twin turbo found in the rs6? Why is this so?

I really lusted for those cars.  Until every RS6 I looked was found to be burning oil.  Sad
Logged
airtite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +13/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 741


« Reply #24 on: May 14, 2012, 12:43:32 AM »

sorry to dig up my old post BUT i have finally managed too read the file from my NA v8, the file is NOT stock however and I have a couple of questions. From my 2 stroke bike days too increase low end torque we would increase timing ie more timing more torque. Now this modified file on my NA v8 looks like the tuner has lowered timing which doesnt make sense too me. I am battling too find the fueling maps like LAMFA in the file so cant really tell whats been done to the fueling. Also KFMIRL has been lowered but IOP has been increased  Huh

my current tuned file

http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=1932.0title=

Logged
Rick
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +63/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 704


« Reply #25 on: May 14, 2012, 08:56:29 AM »

Timing has probably been lowered as the the timing is very aggressive out of the factory, at least the European spec is. 
Logged
Rick
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +63/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 704


« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2012, 09:05:16 AM »

LAMFA is 26DC0 15x6
Logged
airtite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +13/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 741


« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2012, 10:59:38 PM »

thanks Rick, about the timing surely to make more power more aggressive timing is needed?
Logged
Rick
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +63/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 704


« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2012, 12:20:43 AM »

Yes, but if you are already at the knock limit then you can't run more timing. 
Logged
airtite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +13/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 741


« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2012, 01:03:33 AM »

Yes, but if you are already at the knock limit then you can't run more timing. 

cool I am just surprised it comes out the factory like that. I will log timing today and see what is what.

Anybody able too see what these maps are near NMAXGA



Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.038 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.004s, 0q)