Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Simos18, problem with sensor map 4 bar  (Read 15780 times)
yxx499
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 106


« Reply #15 on: June 18, 2019, 12:19:33 PM »

+1 for Dan, true post.
Hopefully, people will start listening as despite people like Johan saying the above it still gets ignored and people wonder why they have issues!

Anyway the AEM 3.5 and 5 bar sensors work ok, there is also another 5bar sensor that works I don't have the details on and the MPX absolute sensor can be made to work as well .

I've also got a few other 4 bar map sensors which claim to read low enough but I've not had a chance to test or even think they will!

Fact is if you're going to spend the money on getting over 2.2bar and c540bhp then the £150 for the AEM is small price to pay really.

Logged
turbojohan
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 185


« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2019, 12:25:59 AM »


This works perfect with mpx 4 bar sensor.
But quite Some work.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
Logged
k0mpresd
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +146/-54
Offline Offline

Posts: 1655


« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2019, 12:55:39 AM »

This works perfect with mpx 4 bar sensor.
But quite Some work.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

so, my idea worked?  Wink
Logged
turbojohan
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 185


« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2019, 01:03:44 AM »

so, my idea worked?  Wink
Yes perfectly! Thanks.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
Logged
k0mpresd
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +146/-54
Offline Offline

Posts: 1655


« Reply #19 on: June 30, 2019, 01:38:21 AM »

Yes perfectly! Thanks.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

great. guess i will install the test sensor in to my own car.  Tongue
« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 01:42:57 AM by k0mpresd » Logged
k0mpresd
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +146/-54
Offline Offline

Posts: 1655


« Reply #20 on: July 19, 2019, 03:46:16 PM »

nice proper oem function here.  Cool
Logged
Claudietto81
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2019, 04:53:51 PM »

I always linearized 4bar map sensor in every car I tuned starting from 215 mv and I never had any issue. Even my 4 bar bosch PUT sensor in my Leon Cupra 290 stage3 I made linearization this way and it works perfectly. Anyway if they needed to use a different 3 bar map sensor for the intake manifold (100-3000 mbar) instead the normal 3 bar map sensor (200-3000 mbar) upstream throttle, maybe 215 mv could not be enough...
Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1070/-476
Offline Offline

Posts: 6017


« Reply #22 on: November 18, 2019, 03:09:48 AM »

I always linearized 4bar map sensor in every car I tuned starting from 215 mv and I never had any issue.
So you never tuned the fuel trims and timing right in a single one of these cars, well done.
These sensors do not show plausible values below 500 mV, it's been tested and confirmed using a vac source, end of story.

The 4 bar Bosch sensors are 500 - 4500 mV in every single stock file. 500 mV for 500 mbar and 4500 mV for 4000 mbar.
The "215" curve is some made up bullshit by someone, then posted over and over on some forums.

If you need to measure below 500 mbar (and on a 2.0T in the intake manifold you do), then this sensor is not suitable.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2019, 03:13:47 AM by prj » Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
Praga
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


« Reply #23 on: November 18, 2020, 10:34:10 AM »

so, my idea worked?  Wink

What idea is that ?
Logged
MaNNsI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2022, 02:27:36 AM »

Hi guys,

To those who care: There are sensor out there which are capable to sens pressures between 105hPa to 3980hPa.

They have also NTC integrated which behaves exactly like stock map sensor.

Perfectly suiting for simo18 cars. With almost 100% OEM lock. Find picture attached.

BR
Logged
konkat
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2022, 04:05:42 AM »

Just use 4Bar PUT sensor and 3Bar MAP sensor up to 2.2bar boost pressure and it will be absolutely ok!
Logged
MaNNsI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2022, 05:55:13 AM »

Just use 4Bar PUT sensor and 3Bar MAP sensor up to 2.2bar boost pressure and it will be absolutely ok!

It’s up to you, using a sensor out of his specification / datasheet.

If you want to drive 3.2 bar and you have an overshoot ECU will not recognize this.

10% margin on to you target is needed from my opinion
Logged
EanDem
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 78


« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2022, 12:20:29 PM »

Just use 4Bar PUT sensor and 3Bar MAP sensor up to 2.2bar boost pressure and it will be absolutely ok!

Seems you have no idea what you wrote here....... Lazy google bit more?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12256


WWW
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2022, 03:39:30 PM »

Just use 4Bar PUT sensor and 3Bar MAP sensor up to 2.2bar boost pressure and it will be absolutely ok!

Please don't post stuff like this.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282



« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2022, 03:54:16 PM »

Hi guys,

To those who care: There are sensor out there which are capable to sens pressures between 105hPa to 3980hPa.

They have also NTC integrated which behaves exactly like stock map sensor.

Perfectly suiting for simo18 cars. With almost 100% OEM lock. Find picture attached.

BR

Part number?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.028 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)