Here's logs from the file I mentioned in post #24.  I haven't had time to try with that KFMIRL/KFMIOP, and I'm not sure I'll have time to do any experimenting soon.  To note though, I didn't have any timing issues when I simply scaled the RS4 interpolated KFMIRL/IOP (as can be seen in the logs below).  Like I mentioned though, my spool ramp up slowed down a little from previous files, as well as slightly lower accel g's and FATS times.  Also to note, I'm only running wastegate spring pressure with no N75, so if the intervention would have kicked in via N75, I wouldn't have noticed it when driving. Also, I'm still working on my fueling, and the weirdness from 3800-4200 is from the notch.

Unfortunately, these logs don't really shed any light on torque intervention.

Are these logs reflecting modified MDZUL or *_um tables?

Someone please log the variables in post 3.

OT:
Jib, so the notch does not manifest in rlmx_w, rlmax_w, or rlsol_w? Just rl_w?
Did you log fnwue?
What variable is labeled IgnitionTimingAngleOverallDesired? zwgru or zwbas?

Not sure what you guys are or aren't doing here.

I don't mean to be rude but the wizards available on here aren't going to help you. I have 700bhp engines that drive completely smoothly with a lovely throttle response at any load and speed. One tip though, don't use IOP to tune throttle response. You'll tie yourself in knots

Rick

One thing I don't understand..  I'm going to babble a bit, let me know if there is something you all don't understand.

Say I'm starting with complete stock S4 M-box variables in the TQ settings..  stock IOP, IRL, etc..

Now I want to ramp load/tq/boost as quickly as possible.  Obviously I need to increase IRL.  After that, I need to edit IOP to match or else the car will buck like a 1980's misfiring jalopy.

But all I see about editing IOP is to either rescale (or even decrease values in IOP if not rescaling).  So by doing that, doesn't it actually negate everything I'm trying to do in IRL?? 

If I want to see 220 load by 3500 RPM, I have that set in LDRXN... in IOP 220 load should be around 95+ say since it will be the last column and that needs to relate to IRL so that between 90-99 I am "requesting" 215-220 load.

All of this "should work" yet I cannot seem to see any good reason why the ECU is limiting my load to 200 (like above).  It's ALWAYS the same, on almost every tune I have that "notch" and this is with different IRL, IOP and other TQ management values.

I'm not only talking about boost Nye.

I'm talking about TQ... I want the motor to make as much TQ as soon as possible.  IRL effects this does it not?

For instance... what do you think would happen if I leave 100% stock M-box IRL, IOP, etc on my Tial car?  Do you not think the ECU will start to limit load?

What I am trying to get at here, no one really knows how to make all that TQ management stuff work together (well apparently Rick does)...

I know 100% that the ECU is holding my car back... I've seen and felt what can happen when I screw with the TQ management settings... It's unbelievable how much stronger the car feels... BUT my modifications are not correct as I will bump into  TQ monitoring codes (level 2) under part throttle.

Why would you want the motor to make as much TQ as soon as possible if you aren't at WOT?


You don't know anything 100% until you've logged the appropriate TQ management variables.

STOP GUESSING

I agree that IRL/IOP map's uploaded shouldn't have too much relevance for 605's or GT's under high load.  For K04's the changes are intense.  Seriously Nyet, you have to try it...  I know you are skeptical but exactly like I said and as did Jibber's initial response, the car feels snappier, sharper, more precisely tuned.  If this wasn't the case, I wouldn't bother responding to my post, because clearly the WOT results look like crap - and nobody seems to be satisfied with them.  For my own sake however, I'm headed back to study BerTTos's tune further.