NefMoto > Technical > Tuning > Rescaling map MAF with REVO intake
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »
Author Topic: Rescaling map MAF with REVO intake  (Read 15549 times)
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-115
Offline Offline

Posts: 1070
« Reply #30 on: April 18, 2020, 02:09:10 AM »
Quote from: nyet on April 17, 2020, 04:55:48 PM
You mean MLHFM.

KFKHFM should overall be around 1.0 on average. It is a CORRECTION map.

Duh dude, there's no MLHFM in any MED9 Wink
Logged
I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #31 on: April 18, 2020, 09:21:36 AM »
Quote from: IamwhoIam on April 18, 2020, 02:09:10 AM
Duh dude, there's no MLHFM in any MED9 Wink



ah. i see.
Logged
ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
dream
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 92
« Reply #32 on: April 18, 2020, 04:05:50 PM »
Quote from: Albertoak on March 20, 2020, 12:26:26 PM
Of course I want to solve it and not only because of the + 8% positive ... but because every time I get to a red light and a neutral change. The rpm drops to 500rpm and goes up to 1000rpm to stabilize the idle ... it's very uncomfortable. and it's their problem ... maf rescaling:

https://youtu.be/w_DdiHKO6Sw

The video I think is a matter of maf or that it resumes the injection of gasoline very late ...



This sometime could also be an idle PID controller
Logged
Albertoak
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-16
Offline Offline

Posts: 76


Well done is better than well said....
« Reply #33 on: April 19, 2020, 01:27:04 AM »
Quote from: dream on April 18, 2020, 04:05:50 PM
This sometime could also be an idle PID controller



mmmm you mean the PID of the HPFP ??

I am also testing with CWPRSOLAP and CWAMSV.
Logged
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-115
Offline Offline

Posts: 1070
« Reply #34 on: April 20, 2020, 11:47:43 AM »
Of course changing several variables at the same time produces the best results ever!
Logged
I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
Albertoak
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-16
Offline Offline

Posts: 76


Well done is better than well said....
« Reply #35 on: April 20, 2020, 12:55:11 PM »
Quote from: IamwhoIam on April 20, 2020, 11:47:43 AM
Of course changing several variables at the same time produces the best results ever!

Could you indicate which variables it refers to?
Logged
vanrhj
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 55
« Reply #36 on: May 24, 2022, 05:42:16 AM »
Quote from: FAREVALO on April 17, 2020, 04:42:25 PM
I have exactly the same issue. I have been trying to increase KFKHFM by percentage as bigger the intake husing is. So my actual housing internal diameter is 3 inches and my understanding is that stock diameter is 2.5 inches. So, calculating area the of 3 inches versus 2.5 inches diameter, the area is almost 50% of difference, in that case I will increase and multiply the stock KFKHFM  by 1.5.

Or what do you think?
U need to rescale MLHFM. I would recommend by 1.6.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Navigation
Personal Tools
  • November 25, 2024, 08:44:09 PM
  • Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?

    Login with username, password and session length
Search
 
Advanced Search
About Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved 2010 Nefarious Motosports
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.018 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)