Hi community, as a complete newbie i am trying to define as much as possible the C box, i researched several hours and found this:
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=3004.msg29517#msg29517I do not want to resume a 10 year old topic so I started another topic about the C box (please don't kill me
) as i know there are already several ones. The last message listed starting addresses of various tables/scalars so i wanted to add them to my xdf file.
I wanted to warn that I think some of the addresses in that post are wrong:
KFMIOP (written 2 times, one is wrong, the other is right)
130D6 WRONG
130D4 CORRECT
LAMFA
1B8CF WRONG
1B8D0 CORRECT
KFLF
189FB WRONG
18FC8 RIGHT
KFDLULS
196B1 WRONG
196B3 CORRECT
KFZWOP
1577C WRONG
1577D CORRECT
KFZWOP2
1582C WRONG
1582D CORRECT
As somebody here suggested, one thing that can be done is to start from the M box and to modify that as we all know is fully defined.
I started in doing that changing the addresses but i encountered a problem with KRKTE (18D61).
The differences are these:
C box
- size 1 byte
- LBS first unchecked
- significant digits 2
- conversion 0.01*X
M box
- size 2 bytes
- LBS first checked
- significant digits 5
- conversion 0.000111*X
After trying to play a bit with those parameters/values i started thinking that there may be too much differences to take for good the same conversion expression and the other things and changing only the address. You can see in the 2 photos attached the results, I think that makes more sense the 0.55 ms from the original xdf than the 2.19 ms from the M modified.
What do you guys think about that? Many thanks.