Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ME7.2 Bosch MAF Scaling (Stock MAF in Bigger Pipe ID).  (Read 972 times)
Fabioo
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« on: April 19, 2024, 09:16:05 AM »

Hello, i did fit Stock MAF into 100 mm ID Pipe and would like to Proper* scale it (Because scaled on Factor or Surface Scalars doesnt work well).
Found out so far that best scaling method is by using 4-6th Polynomial Equation.
Made excel sheet with Stock MAF kg/h's and Voltages from the binary then made a graph of it and excel came up with a 5th Polynomial Equation.
Also used LINEST function to find a values of the 5th Polynomial Equation so i can use them.

But now i am stuck how to apply any changes by diameter of the pipe to the equation.

Any help appreciated.
Thanks
« Last Edit: April 19, 2024, 09:42:51 AM by Fabioo » Logged
Fabioo
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2024, 03:48:43 AM »

Anyone good at excell ? or i am blind and did mistake somewhere
kg/h's should be the same, polynomial equation is calculated by excel itself based on the MAF Curve but when i re-apply the equation i got different output ...

 
Logged
Fabioo
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2024, 09:32:43 AM »

Ok i've had problem with system separators i guess, after set it up properly to decimal dot instead sheet works now.
Uploading updated sheet and Polynomial Equation seems to work but still i don't know if it is proper scaled if anyone could take a look.

Red KG/h is rescaled by Polynomial Equation based on Stock MAF.

Yellow is adjusted by hand so i could drive the car.

Blue marked cells 230kg/h seems to be my Stable Idle point that i hold on to.

Gonna test Red scaling in car, any help would be appreciated thanks.
Logged
zachn1998
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2024, 08:33:21 PM »

How did this go?
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.013 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)