Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: frm_w and trims  (Read 16180 times)
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2012, 06:15:02 AM »

I have been turning off LTFT's but not closed loop, and have been doing this when I have been setting up for FKKVS/FRLFSDP/KRKTE on my returnless wideband 7.5.

It get reaaaally old to dial those maps when you have 1000cc injectors which are basicly non-linear until you get in boost, when you have partial LTFT skewing up the mixture. Does not really make much difference with them on or off now, as my corrections are +-5% under normal driving conditions, well at least over ~1ms effective PW's.

When im happy with my fueling model, im ofcourse turning them on again for the reasons prj mentioned.

IIRC its 4x5 or 5x4, I used the TT damos as reference, I can take a look after work.

I'm doing same for fuel adjustments... Basically with my ME7 Wizzard I'm generating FKKVS table with trims disabled. I'll check out TT damos, but if you could look too that would be awesome. Thanks
Logged

masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2012, 07:30:20 AM »

BTW: I've checked LRSHK function for postcat o2 sensor. Basically if anyone wants to disable sensor postcat correction but leave sensor plugged in then all you have to do is set bit0 and bit1 of CLRSHK to 1 (TRUE):

CLRSHK (bit0) = 1 => b_lrhkg = 0 => b_lrhkb = 0 => b_lrhkp = 0 => dlahp_w = 0
CLRSHK (bit0) = 1 => b_lrhkg = 0 => b_lrhkb = 0 => b_lrhk = 0
CLRSHK (bit1) = 1 => dlahi_w = 0


(single bank systems)

I know that in s4wiki it is said to set CLRHK to 5 but I don't know why it is needed so. 3 is enough
« Last Edit: October 18, 2012, 09:09:31 AM by masterj » Logged

phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2012, 08:39:49 AM »

BTW: I've checked LRSHK function for postcat o2 sensor. Basically if anyone wants to disable sensor postcat correction but leave sensor plugged in then all you have to do is set bit0 and bit1 of CLRSHK to 1 (TRUE):

CLRSHK (bit0) = 1 => b_lrhkg = 0 => b_lrhkb = 0 => b_lrhkp = 0 => dlahi_w = 0
CLRSHK (bit0) = 1 => b_lrhkg = 0 => b_lrhkb = 0 => b_lrhk = 0
CLRSHK (bit1) = 1 => dlahi_w = 0


(single bank systems)

I know that in s4wiki it is said to set CLRHK to 5 but I don't know why it is needed so. 3 is enough

IIRC, I decided to set bit 2 to ensure that atv is clear.
Logged
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2012, 10:54:28 AM »

IIRC, I decided to set bit 2 to ensure that atv is clear.

Oh, I see... Phila_dot, have you checked the DLSSA function? I'm kinda lost here... How is system constant SY_STETLR set? Shocked When is DLSSA called? (Maybe we should increase DLAHISATO & DLAHISATU, when dhali_w = 0?) (I hate these ASCII diagrams...)

Also, when we disable LRSKA I think we still have to look at LAMKO... In LAMSEL when lamka_w < 2.0 then B_lamka is set and min value is taken between lamka_w & lamnswl_w.... Or am I wrong here?
« Last Edit: October 18, 2012, 05:41:56 PM by masterj » Logged

masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2012, 05:17:16 PM »

One more small thing noticed... If you look at the ETALAM map you can find out which AFR is most effective to your car (axis is lambda x 14.7 = AFR)

I did small calculation and found out that at the ~13.2 AFR I get 101.5% of power Wink
Logged

prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-481
Offline Offline

Posts: 6037


« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2012, 05:35:19 AM »

One more small thing noticed... If you look at the ETALAM map you can find out which AFR is most effective to your car (axis is lambda x 14.7 = AFR)

I did small calculation and found out that at the ~13.2 AFR I get 101.5% of power Wink

Yes, an ECU value can tell you what AFR to tune to ....  Roll Eyes
Just a tip - you are very wrong.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2012, 09:12:15 AM »

Yes, an ECU value can tell you what AFR to tune to ....  Roll Eyes
Just a tip - you are very wrong.

I'm just saying how engineers in bosch thought and also programmed ecu. By using said AFR you'll get multiplier of 1,015 of your max torque
Logged

ABCD
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 78



« Reply #22 on: October 21, 2012, 08:45:28 PM »

One more small thing noticed... If you look at the ETALAM map you can find out which AFR is most effective to your car (axis is lambda x 14.7 = AFR)

I did small calculation and found out that at the ~13.2 AFR I get 101.5% of power Wink

What calculation you did?
I didnt quite get you...
Logged
masterj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 1049



WWW
« Reply #23 on: October 22, 2012, 04:43:19 AM »

What calculation you did?
I didnt quite get you...

Look at the ETALAM map in FR and analyze it's axis. It is lambda val of 1V which is stoich...
Logged

prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-481
Offline Offline

Posts: 6037


« Reply #24 on: October 23, 2012, 05:37:23 AM »

I'm just saying how engineers in bosch thought and also programmed ecu. By using said AFR you'll get multiplier of 1,015 of your max torque
Which means absolutely nothing in an actual real world scenario, as by using this uber AFR of yours you will reduce torque.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.021 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)